Football statistics for Yokohama F. Marinos

Team Info

Season

Country

Stadium

2025

Japan

Nissan Stadium

Competition

Japan

J1 League

Japan

J1 League

Japan

Emperor Cup

Asia

AFC Champions League

Summary Match Schedule Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	18	55%	38%	71%
2	Yokohama	33	9	27%	18%	38%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	12	36%	44%	29%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	10	30%	29%	31%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	19	58%	41%	75%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	10	30%	31%	29%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	18	55%	56%	53%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	12	36%	41%	31%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	16	48%	50%	47%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	21	64%	71%	56%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	14	42%	44%	41%
12	Urawa Reds	33	13	39%	41%	38%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	16	48%	56%	41%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	16	48%	47%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	12	36%	38%	35%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	14	42%	41%	44%
17	Tokyo	33	15	45%	53%	38%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	16	48%	47%	50%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	12	36%	38%	35%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	21	64%	69%	59%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	33	100%	100%	100%
2	Yokohama	33	29	88%	94%	81%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	29	88%	88%	88%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	30	91%	88%	94%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	32	97%	100%	94%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	26	79%	94%	65%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	32	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	28	85%	82%	88%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	31	94%	94%	94%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	30	91%	88%	94%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	30	91%	81%	100%
12	Urawa Reds	33	28	85%	88%	81%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	31	94%	100%	88%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	32	97%	94%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	31	94%	94%	94%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	30	91%	88%	94%
17	Tokyo	33	32	97%	94%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	31	94%	88%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	30	91%	88%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	31	94%	94%	94%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	27	82%	75%	88%
2	Yokohama	33	17	52%	47%	56%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	23	70%	88%	53%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	18	55%	47%	63%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	28	85%	82%	88%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	13	39%	44%	35%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	23	70%	75%	65%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	17	52%	53%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	23	70%	63%	76%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	28	85%	88%	81%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	21	64%	75%	53%
12	Urawa Reds	33	20	61%	53%	69%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	21	64%	69%	59%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	21	64%	71%	56%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	18	55%	50%	59%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	18	55%	53%	56%
17	Tokyo	33	22	67%	65%	69%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	23	70%	71%	69%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	24	73%	63%	82%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	27	82%	81%	82%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	7	21%	19%	24%
2	Yokohama	33	2	6%	6%	6%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	6	18%	25%	12%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	3	9%	6%	13%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	10	30%	12%	50%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	5	15%	13%	18%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	7	21%	13%	29%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	6	18%	24%	13%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	7	21%	19%	24%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	6	18%	24%	13%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	7	21%	13%	29%
12	Urawa Reds	33	6	18%	18%	19%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	11	33%	31%	35%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	7	21%	24%	19%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	1	3%	0%	6%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	7	21%	24%	19%
17	Tokyo	33	9	27%	29%	25%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	9	27%	29%	25%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	6	18%	25%	12%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	10	30%	50%	12%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	4	12%	13%	12%
2	Yokohama	33	1	3%	0%	6%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	3	9%	6%	12%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	2	6%	0%	13%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	5	15%	6%	25%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	1	3%	6%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	3	9%	12%	6%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	3	9%	13%	6%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	1	3%	6%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	3	9%	6%	12%
12	Urawa Reds	33	4	12%	12%	13%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	6	18%	19%	18%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	2	6%	12%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	2	6%	6%	6%
17	Tokyo	33	4	12%	12%	13%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	4	12%	12%	13%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	4	12%	13%	12%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	5	15%	25%	6%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	2	6%	0%	12%
2	Yokohama	33	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	1	3%	0%	6%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	1	3%	0%	6%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	4	12%	6%	19%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	1	3%	6%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	2	6%	6%	6%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	2	6%	13%	0%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	1	3%	6%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	1	3%	0%	6%
12	Urawa Reds	33	1	3%	0%	6%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	4	12%	13%	12%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	1	3%	6%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Tokyo	33	0	0%	0%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	2	6%	6%	6%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	3	9%	13%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	5	15%	25%	6%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	15	45%	63%	29%
2	Yokohama	33	24	73%	82%	63%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	21	64%	56%	71%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	23	70%	71%	69%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	14	42%	59%	25%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	23	70%	69%	71%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	15	45%	44%	47%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	21	64%	59%	69%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	17	52%	50%	53%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	12	36%	29%	44%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	19	58%	56%	59%
12	Urawa Reds	33	20	61%	59%	63%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	17	52%	44%	59%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	17	52%	53%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	21	64%	63%	65%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	19	58%	59%	56%
17	Tokyo	33	18	55%	47%	63%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	17	52%	53%	50%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	21	64%	63%	65%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	12	36%	31%	41%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Yokohama	33	4	12%	6%	19%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	4	12%	13%	12%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	3	9%	12%	6%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	1	3%	0%	6%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	7	21%	6%	35%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	5	15%	18%	13%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	2	6%	6%	6%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	3	9%	12%	6%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	3	9%	19%	0%
12	Urawa Reds	33	5	15%	12%	19%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	2	6%	0%	12%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	1	3%	6%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	2	6%	6%	6%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	3	9%	12%	6%
17	Tokyo	33	1	3%	6%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	2	6%	12%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	3	9%	13%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	2	6%	6%	6%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	6	18%	25%	12%
2	Yokohama	33	16	48%	53%	44%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	10	30%	13%	47%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	15	45%	53%	38%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	5	15%	18%	13%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	20	61%	56%	65%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	10	30%	25%	35%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	16	48%	47%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	10	30%	38%	24%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	5	15%	12%	19%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	12	36%	25%	47%
12	Urawa Reds	33	13	39%	47%	31%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	12	36%	31%	41%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	12	36%	29%	44%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	15	45%	50%	41%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	15	45%	47%	44%
17	Tokyo	33	11	33%	35%	31%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	10	30%	29%	31%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	9	27%	38%	18%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	6	18%	19%	18%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	26	79%	81%	76%
2	Yokohama	33	31	94%	94%	94%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	27	82%	75%	88%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	30	91%	94%	88%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	23	70%	88%	50%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	28	85%	88%	82%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	26	79%	88%	71%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	27	82%	76%	88%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	26	79%	81%	76%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	27	82%	76%	88%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	26	79%	88%	71%
12	Urawa Reds	33	27	82%	82%	81%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	22	67%	69%	65%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	26	79%	76%	81%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	32	97%	100%	94%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	26	79%	76%	81%
17	Tokyo	33	24	73%	71%	75%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	24	73%	71%	75%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	27	82%	75%	88%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	23	70%	50%	88%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	29	88%	88%	88%
2	Yokohama	33	32	97%	100%	94%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	30	91%	94%	88%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	31	94%	100%	88%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	28	85%	94%	75%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	32	97%	94%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	32	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	30	91%	88%	94%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	30	91%	88%	94%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	32	97%	94%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	30	91%	94%	88%
12	Urawa Reds	33	29	88%	88%	88%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	27	82%	81%	82%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	31	94%	88%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	33	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	31	94%	94%	94%
17	Tokyo	33	29	88%	88%	88%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	29	88%	88%	88%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	29	88%	88%	88%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	28	85%	75%	94%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	33	31	94%	100%	88%
2	Yokohama	33	33	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	33	32	97%	100%	94%
4	Fagiano Okayama	33	32	97%	100%	94%
5	Cerezo Osaka	33	29	88%	94%	81%
6	Tokyo Verdy	33	32	97%	94%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	33	32	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	33	31	94%	94%	94%
9	Shonan Bellmare	33	31	94%	88%	100%
10	Nagoya Grampus	33	32	97%	94%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	33	32	97%	100%	94%
12	Urawa Reds	33	32	97%	100%	94%
13	Gamba Osaka	33	29	88%	88%	88%
14	Kashima Antlers	33	32	97%	94%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	33	33	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	33	33	100%	100%	100%
17	Tokyo	33	33	100%	100%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	33	31	94%	94%	94%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	33	30	91%	88%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	33	28	85%	75%	94%

Average goals scored and conceded: Yokohama F. Marinos

Knowing Yokohama F. Marinos’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the J1 League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Yokohama F. Marinos’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

42% of Yokohama F. Marinos games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Yokohama F. Marinos and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 58%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in Japanese League.

All of this information can help determine how Yokohama F. Marinos’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.