Football statistics for Yokohama F. Marinos

Team Info

Season

2025

Country

Japan

Stadium

Nissan Stadium

Competition

Japan

J1 League

Japan

Emperor Cup

Asia

AFC Champions League

Summary Match Schedule Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	15	58%	42%	71%
2	Yokohama	26	8	31%	21%	42%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	11	42%	54%	31%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	8	31%	36%	25%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	15	58%	46%	69%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	7	27%	23%	31%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	16	59%	64%	54%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	9	35%	38%	31%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	12	46%	46%	46%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	17	65%	67%	64%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	11	42%	46%	38%
12	Urawa Reds	27	13	48%	50%	46%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	12	44%	50%	40%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	12	46%	43%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	9	33%	36%	31%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	12	44%	38%	50%
17	Tokyo	26	13	50%	54%	46%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	14	54%	54%	54%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	10	37%	38%	36%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	16	62%	69%	54%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	26	100%	100%	100%
2	Yokohama	26	24	92%	100%	83%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	24	92%	92%	92%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	24	92%	93%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	25	96%	100%	92%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	21	81%	100%	62%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	27	100%	100%	100%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	22	85%	85%	85%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	24	92%	92%	92%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	24	92%	83%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	24	92%	85%	100%
12	Urawa Reds	27	24	89%	86%	92%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	26	96%	100%	93%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	26	100%	100%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	26	96%	93%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	25	93%	92%	93%
17	Tokyo	26	25	96%	92%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	25	96%	92%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	26	96%	92%	100%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	24	92%	92%	92%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	21	81%	75%	86%
2	Yokohama	26	15	58%	57%	58%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	20	77%	92%	62%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	15	58%	57%	58%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	21	81%	77%	85%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	10	38%	38%	38%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	19	70%	79%	62%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	13	50%	54%	46%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	19	73%	62%	85%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	23	88%	83%	93%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	17	65%	77%	54%
12	Urawa Reds	27	20	74%	64%	85%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	17	63%	67%	60%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	16	62%	71%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	13	48%	43%	54%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	15	56%	54%	57%
17	Tokyo	26	18	69%	69%	69%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	20	77%	77%	77%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	21	78%	69%	86%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	21	81%	85%	77%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	5	19%	17%	21%
2	Yokohama	26	1	4%	7%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	6	23%	31%	15%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	1	4%	7%	0%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	8	31%	15%	46%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	3	12%	8%	15%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	6	22%	14%	31%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	5	19%	23%	15%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	5	19%	15%	23%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	3	12%	8%	14%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	5	19%	15%	23%
12	Urawa Reds	27	6	22%	21%	23%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	7	26%	17%	33%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	5	19%	21%	17%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	1	4%	0%	8%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	6	22%	23%	21%
17	Tokyo	26	7	27%	23%	31%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	8	31%	38%	23%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	5	19%	31%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	7	27%	46%	8%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	3	12%	8%	14%
2	Yokohama	26	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	3	12%	8%	15%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	0	0%	0%	0%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	4	15%	8%	23%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	0	0%	0%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	0	0%	0%	0%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	2	8%	8%	8%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	2	8%	8%	8%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	0	0%	0%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	2	8%	8%	8%
12	Urawa Reds	27	4	15%	14%	15%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	3	11%	8%	13%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	2	8%	14%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	2	7%	8%	7%
17	Tokyo	26	3	12%	8%	15%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	3	12%	15%	8%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	3	11%	15%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	2	8%	15%	0%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	2	8%	0%	14%
2	Yokohama	26	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	1	4%	0%	8%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	0	0%	0%	0%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	3	12%	8%	15%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	0	0%	0%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	0	0%	0%	0%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	1	4%	0%	8%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	1	4%	8%	0%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	0	0%	0%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	1	4%	0%	8%
12	Urawa Reds	27	1	4%	0%	8%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	2	7%	8%	7%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	1	4%	7%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Tokyo	26	0	0%	0%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	1	4%	8%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	2	7%	15%	0%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	2	8%	15%	0%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	11	42%	58%	29%
2	Yokohama	26	18	69%	79%	58%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	15	58%	46%	69%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	18	69%	64%	75%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	11	42%	54%	31%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	19	73%	77%	69%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	11	41%	36%	46%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	17	65%	62%	69%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	14	54%	54%	54%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	9	35%	33%	36%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	15	58%	54%	62%
12	Urawa Reds	27	14	52%	50%	54%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	15	56%	50%	60%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	14	54%	57%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	18	67%	64%	69%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	15	56%	62%	50%
17	Tokyo	26	13	50%	46%	54%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	12	46%	46%	46%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	17	63%	62%	64%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	10	38%	31%	46%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Yokohama	26	2	8%	0%	17%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	2	8%	8%	8%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	2	8%	7%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	1	4%	0%	8%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	5	19%	0%	38%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	0	0%	0%	0%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	4	15%	15%	15%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	2	8%	8%	8%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	2	8%	17%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	2	8%	15%	0%
12	Urawa Reds	27	3	11%	14%	8%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	1	4%	0%	7%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	0	0%	0%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	1	4%	7%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	2	7%	8%	7%
17	Tokyo	26	1	4%	8%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	1	4%	8%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	1	4%	8%	0%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	2	8%	8%	8%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	5	19%	25%	14%
2	Yokohama	26	11	42%	43%	42%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	6	23%	8%	38%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	11	42%	43%	42%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	5	19%	23%	15%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	16	62%	62%	62%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	8	30%	21%	38%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	13	50%	46%	54%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	7	27%	38%	15%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	3	12%	17%	7%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	9	35%	23%	46%
12	Urawa Reds	27	7	26%	36%	15%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	10	37%	33%	40%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	10	38%	29%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	14	52%	57%	46%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	12	44%	46%	43%
17	Tokyo	26	8	31%	31%	31%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	6	23%	23%	23%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	6	22%	31%	14%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	5	19%	15%	23%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	21	81%	83%	79%
2	Yokohama	26	25	96%	93%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	20	77%	69%	85%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	25	96%	93%	100%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	18	69%	85%	54%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	23	88%	92%	85%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	21	78%	86%	69%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	21	81%	77%	85%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	21	81%	85%	77%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	23	88%	92%	86%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	21	81%	85%	77%
12	Urawa Reds	27	21	78%	79%	77%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	20	74%	83%	67%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	21	81%	79%	83%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	26	96%	100%	92%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	21	78%	77%	79%
17	Tokyo	26	19	73%	77%	69%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	18	69%	62%	77%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	22	81%	69%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	19	73%	54%	92%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	23	88%	92%	86%
2	Yokohama	26	26	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	23	88%	92%	85%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	26	100%	100%	100%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	22	85%	92%	77%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	26	100%	100%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	27	100%	100%	100%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	24	92%	92%	92%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	24	92%	92%	92%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	26	100%	100%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	24	92%	92%	92%
12	Urawa Reds	27	23	85%	86%	85%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	24	89%	92%	87%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	24	92%	86%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	27	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	25	93%	92%	93%
17	Tokyo	26	23	88%	92%	85%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	23	88%	85%	92%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	24	89%	85%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	24	92%	85%	100%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	26	24	92%	100%	86%
2	Yokohama	26	26	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	26	25	96%	100%	92%
4	Fagiano Okayama	26	26	100%	100%	100%
5	Cerezo Osaka	26	23	88%	92%	85%
6	Tokyo Verdy	26	26	100%	100%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	27	27	100%	100%	100%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	26	25	96%	100%	92%
9	Shonan Bellmare	26	25	96%	92%	100%
10	Nagoya Grampus	26	26	100%	100%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	26	25	96%	100%	92%
12	Urawa Reds	27	26	96%	100%	92%
13	Gamba Osaka	27	25	93%	92%	93%
14	Kashima Antlers	26	25	96%	93%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	27	27	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	27	27	100%	100%	100%
17	Tokyo	26	26	100%	100%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	26	25	96%	92%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	27	25	93%	85%	100%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	26	24	92%	85%	100%

Average goals scored and conceded: Yokohama F. Marinos

Knowing Yokohama F. Marinos’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the J1 League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Yokohama F. Marinos’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

42% of Yokohama F. Marinos games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Yokohama F. Marinos and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 58%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in J. League.

All of this information can help determine how Yokohama F. Marinos’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.