Football statistics for Kashima Antlers

Team Info

Season

Country

Stadium

2025

Japan

Kashima Soccer Stadium

Competition

Japan

J1 League

Japan

Emperor Cup

Summary Match Schedule Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	17	59%	46%	69%
2	Yokohama	29	9	31%	20%	43%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	11	38%	50%	27%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	9	31%	31%	31%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	16	55%	40%	71%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	8	28%	29%	27%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	17	57%	60%	53%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	11	38%	40%	36%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	14	48%	50%	47%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	18	62%	64%	60%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	12	41%	47%	36%
12	Urawa Reds	29	13	45%	47%	43%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	14	47%	50%	44%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	14	48%	47%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	10	33%	33%	33%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	12	40%	33%	47%
17	Tokyo	29	14	48%	53%	43%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	15	52%	53%	50%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	11	38%	43%	33%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	19	66%	71%	60%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	29	100%	100%	100%
2	Yokohama	29	26	90%	93%	86%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	26	90%	93%	87%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	27	93%	94%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	28	97%	100%	93%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	23	79%	100%	60%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	29	97%	100%	93%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	24	83%	80%	86%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	27	93%	93%	93%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	27	93%	86%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	26	90%	80%	100%
12	Urawa Reds	29	26	90%	87%	93%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	29	97%	100%	94%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	29	100%	100%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	29	97%	93%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	27	90%	87%	93%
17	Tokyo	29	28	97%	93%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	28	97%	93%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	27	93%	93%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	27	93%	93%	93%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	24	83%	77%	88%
2	Yokohama	29	17	59%	53%	64%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	21	72%	93%	53%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	16	55%	50%	62%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	24	83%	80%	86%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	11	38%	43%	33%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	21	70%	80%	60%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	15	52%	53%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	21	72%	64%	80%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	25	86%	86%	87%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	18	62%	73%	50%
12	Urawa Reds	29	20	69%	60%	79%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	19	63%	64%	63%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	19	66%	73%	57%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	16	53%	47%	60%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	16	53%	47%	60%
17	Tokyo	29	20	69%	67%	71%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	21	72%	73%	71%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	22	76%	71%	80%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	24	83%	86%	80%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	7	24%	23%	25%
2	Yokohama	29	2	7%	7%	7%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	6	21%	29%	13%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	2	7%	6%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	9	31%	13%	50%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	3	10%	7%	13%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	7	23%	13%	33%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	6	21%	27%	14%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	6	21%	21%	20%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	4	14%	14%	13%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	5	17%	13%	21%
12	Urawa Reds	29	6	21%	20%	21%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	9	30%	21%	38%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	5	17%	20%	14%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	1	3%	0%	7%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	6	20%	20%	20%
17	Tokyo	29	8	28%	27%	29%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	8	28%	33%	21%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	5	17%	29%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	9	31%	50%	13%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	4	14%	15%	13%
2	Yokohama	29	1	3%	0%	7%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	3	10%	7%	13%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	1	3%	0%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	5	17%	7%	29%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	0	0%	0%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	1	3%	0%	7%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	3	10%	13%	7%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	3	10%	14%	7%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	1	3%	7%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	2	7%	7%	7%
12	Urawa Reds	29	4	14%	13%	14%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	5	17%	14%	19%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	2	7%	13%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	2	7%	7%	7%
17	Tokyo	29	3	10%	7%	14%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	3	10%	13%	7%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	3	10%	14%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	4	14%	21%	7%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	2	7%	0%	13%
2	Yokohama	29	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	1	3%	0%	7%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	0	0%	0%	0%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	4	14%	7%	21%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	0	0%	0%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	1	3%	0%	7%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	2	7%	7%	7%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	2	7%	14%	0%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	1	3%	7%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	1	3%	0%	7%
12	Urawa Reds	29	1	3%	0%	7%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	3	10%	7%	13%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	1	3%	7%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Tokyo	29	0	0%	0%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	1	3%	7%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	2	7%	14%	0%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	4	14%	21%	7%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	12	41%	54%	31%
2	Yokohama	29	20	69%	80%	57%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	18	62%	50%	73%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	20	69%	69%	69%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	13	45%	60%	29%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	21	72%	71%	73%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	13	43%	40%	47%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	18	62%	60%	64%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	15	52%	50%	53%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	11	38%	36%	40%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	17	59%	53%	64%
12	Urawa Reds	29	16	55%	53%	57%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	16	53%	50%	56%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	15	52%	53%	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	20	67%	67%	67%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	18	60%	67%	53%
17	Tokyo	29	15	52%	47%	57%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	14	48%	47%	50%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	18	62%	57%	67%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	10	34%	29%	40%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Yokohama	29	3	10%	7%	14%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	3	10%	7%	13%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	2	7%	6%	8%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	1	3%	0%	7%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	6	21%	0%	40%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	1	3%	0%	7%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	5	17%	20%	14%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	2	7%	7%	7%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	2	7%	14%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	3	10%	20%	0%
12	Urawa Reds	29	3	10%	13%	7%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	1	3%	0%	6%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	0	0%	0%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	1	3%	7%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	3	10%	13%	7%
17	Tokyo	29	1	3%	7%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	1	3%	7%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	2	7%	7%	7%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	2	7%	7%	7%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	5	17%	23%	13%
2	Yokohama	29	12	41%	47%	36%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	8	28%	7%	47%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	13	45%	50%	38%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	5	17%	20%	14%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	18	62%	57%	67%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	9	30%	20%	40%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	14	48%	47%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	8	28%	36%	20%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	4	14%	14%	13%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	11	38%	27%	50%
12	Urawa Reds	29	9	31%	40%	21%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	11	37%	36%	38%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	10	34%	27%	43%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	14	47%	53%	40%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	14	47%	53%	40%
17	Tokyo	29	9	31%	33%	29%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	8	28%	27%	29%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	7	24%	29%	20%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	5	17%	14%	20%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	22	76%	77%	75%
2	Yokohama	29	27	93%	93%	93%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	23	79%	71%	87%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	27	93%	94%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	20	69%	87%	50%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	26	90%	93%	87%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	23	77%	87%	67%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	23	79%	73%	86%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	23	79%	79%	80%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	25	86%	86%	87%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	24	83%	87%	79%
12	Urawa Reds	29	23	79%	80%	79%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	21	70%	79%	63%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	24	83%	80%	86%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	29	97%	100%	93%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	24	80%	80%	80%
17	Tokyo	29	21	72%	73%	71%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	21	72%	67%	79%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	24	83%	71%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	20	69%	50%	87%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	25	86%	85%	88%
2	Yokohama	29	28	97%	100%	93%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	26	90%	93%	87%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	28	97%	100%	92%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	24	83%	93%	71%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	29	100%	100%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	29	97%	100%	93%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	26	90%	87%	93%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	26	90%	86%	93%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	28	97%	93%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	27	93%	93%	93%
12	Urawa Reds	29	25	86%	87%	86%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	25	83%	86%	81%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	27	93%	87%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	30	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	28	93%	93%	93%
17	Tokyo	29	26	90%	93%	86%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	26	90%	87%	93%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	26	90%	86%	93%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	25	86%	79%	93%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	29	27	93%	100%	88%
2	Yokohama	29	29	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	29	28	97%	100%	93%
4	Fagiano Okayama	29	29	100%	100%	100%
5	Cerezo Osaka	29	25	86%	93%	79%
6	Tokyo Verdy	29	29	100%	100%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	30	29	97%	100%	93%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	29	27	93%	93%	93%
9	Shonan Bellmare	29	27	93%	86%	100%
10	Nagoya Grampus	29	28	97%	93%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	29	28	97%	100%	93%
12	Urawa Reds	29	28	97%	100%	93%
13	Gamba Osaka	30	27	90%	93%	88%
14	Kashima Antlers	29	28	97%	93%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	30	30	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	30	100%	100%	100%
17	Tokyo	29	29	100%	100%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	29	28	97%	93%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	29	27	93%	86%	100%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	29	25	86%	79%	93%

Average goals scored and conceded: Kashima Antlers

Knowing Kashima Antlers’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the J1 League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Kashima Antlers’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

48% of Kashima Antlers games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Kashima Antlers and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 52%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in J. League.

All of this information can help determine how Kashima Antlers’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.