Football statistics for Kashima Antlers

Team Info

Season

Country

Venue

2025

Japan

Kashima Soccer Stadium

Competition

Japan

J1 League

Japan

J1 League

Japan

Emperor Cup

Summary Match Schedule Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	18	51%	35%	67%
2	Yokohama	35	10	29%	22%	35%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	13	37%	41%	33%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	12	34%	33%	35%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	20	57%	39%	76%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	10	29%	29%	28%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	18	51%	53%	50%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	12	34%	39%	29%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	16	46%	47%	44%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	22	63%	67%	59%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	16	46%	50%	41%
12	Urawa Reds	35	14	40%	39%	41%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	17	49%	59%	39%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	16	46%	47%	44%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	13	37%	35%	39%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	15	43%	39%	47%
17	Tokyo	35	16	46%	56%	35%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	17	49%	50%	47%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	13	37%	35%	39%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	22	63%	71%	56%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	35	100%	100%	100%
2	Yokohama	35	31	89%	94%	82%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	31	89%	88%	89%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	32	91%	89%	94%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	34	97%	100%	94%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	28	80%	94%	67%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	32	91%	94%	89%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	29	83%	83%	82%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	33	94%	94%	94%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	32	91%	89%	94%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	32	91%	83%	100%
12	Urawa Reds	35	29	83%	83%	82%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	33	94%	100%	89%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	33	94%	94%	94%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	32	91%	88%	94%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	31	89%	83%	94%
17	Tokyo	35	33	94%	94%	94%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	33	94%	89%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	32	91%	88%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	33	94%	94%	94%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	29	83%	76%	89%
2	Yokohama	35	19	54%	50%	59%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	24	69%	82%	56%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	20	57%	50%	65%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	30	86%	83%	88%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	13	37%	41%	33%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	23	66%	71%	61%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	17	49%	50%	47%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	24	69%	65%	72%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	30	86%	89%	82%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	23	66%	78%	53%
12	Urawa Reds	35	21	60%	50%	71%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	23	66%	71%	61%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	22	63%	71%	56%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	19	54%	47%	61%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	19	54%	50%	59%
17	Tokyo	35	23	66%	67%	65%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	24	69%	72%	65%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	26	74%	65%	83%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	29	83%	82%	83%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	7	20%	18%	22%
2	Yokohama	35	3	9%	11%	6%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	7	20%	24%	17%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	4	11%	6%	18%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	10	29%	11%	47%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	5	14%	12%	17%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	7	20%	12%	28%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	6	17%	22%	12%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	7	20%	18%	22%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	7	20%	22%	18%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	8	23%	17%	29%
12	Urawa Reds	35	7	20%	17%	24%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	12	34%	35%	33%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	7	20%	24%	17%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	1	3%	0%	6%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	8	23%	22%	24%
17	Tokyo	35	10	29%	33%	24%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	10	29%	33%	24%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	7	20%	24%	17%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	11	31%	53%	11%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	4	11%	12%	11%
2	Yokohama	35	1	3%	0%	6%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	4	11%	6%	17%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	2	6%	0%	12%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	5	14%	6%	24%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	1	3%	6%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	3	9%	11%	6%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	3	9%	12%	6%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	1	3%	6%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	3	9%	6%	12%
12	Urawa Reds	35	4	11%	11%	12%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	7	20%	24%	17%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	2	6%	12%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	2	6%	6%	6%
17	Tokyo	35	4	11%	11%	12%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	4	11%	11%	12%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	5	14%	12%	17%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	6	17%	29%	6%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	2	6%	0%	11%
2	Yokohama	35	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	2	6%	0%	11%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	1	3%	0%	6%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	4	11%	6%	18%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	1	3%	6%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	2	6%	6%	6%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	2	6%	12%	0%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	1	3%	6%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	1	3%	0%	6%
12	Urawa Reds	35	1	3%	0%	6%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	4	11%	12%	11%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	1	3%	6%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Tokyo	35	0	0%	0%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	2	6%	6%	6%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	3	9%	12%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	6	17%	29%	6%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	17	49%	65%	33%
2	Yokohama	35	25	71%	78%	65%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	22	63%	59%	67%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	23	66%	67%	65%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	15	43%	61%	24%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	25	71%	71%	72%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	17	49%	47%	50%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	23	66%	61%	71%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	19	54%	53%	56%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	13	37%	33%	41%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	19	54%	50%	59%
12	Urawa Reds	35	21	60%	61%	59%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	18	51%	41%	61%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	19	54%	53%	56%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	22	63%	65%	61%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	20	57%	61%	53%
17	Tokyo	35	19	54%	44%	65%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	18	51%	50%	53%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	22	63%	65%	61%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	13	37%	29%	44%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Yokohama	35	4	11%	6%	18%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	4	11%	12%	11%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	3	9%	11%	6%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	1	3%	0%	6%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	7	20%	6%	33%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	3	9%	6%	11%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	6	17%	17%	18%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	2	6%	6%	6%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	3	9%	11%	6%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	3	9%	17%	0%
12	Urawa Reds	35	6	17%	17%	18%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	2	6%	0%	11%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	2	6%	6%	6%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	3	9%	12%	6%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	4	11%	17%	6%
17	Tokyo	35	2	6%	6%	6%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	2	6%	11%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	3	9%	12%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	2	6%	6%	6%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	6	17%	24%	11%
2	Yokohama	35	16	46%	50%	41%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	11	31%	18%	44%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	15	43%	50%	35%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	5	14%	17%	12%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	22	63%	59%	67%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	12	34%	29%	39%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	18	51%	50%	53%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	11	31%	35%	28%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	5	14%	11%	18%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	12	34%	22%	47%
12	Urawa Reds	35	14	40%	50%	29%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	12	34%	29%	39%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	13	37%	29%	44%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	16	46%	53%	39%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	16	46%	50%	41%
17	Tokyo	35	12	34%	33%	35%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	11	31%	28%	35%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	9	26%	35%	17%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	6	17%	18%	17%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	28	80%	82%	78%
2	Yokohama	35	32	91%	89%	94%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	28	80%	76%	83%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	31	89%	94%	82%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	25	71%	89%	53%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	30	86%	88%	83%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	28	80%	88%	72%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	29	83%	78%	88%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	28	80%	82%	78%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	28	80%	78%	82%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	27	77%	83%	71%
12	Urawa Reds	35	28	80%	83%	76%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	23	66%	65%	67%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	28	80%	76%	83%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	34	97%	100%	94%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	27	77%	78%	76%
17	Tokyo	35	25	71%	67%	76%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	25	71%	67%	76%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	28	80%	76%	83%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	24	69%	47%	89%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	31	89%	88%	89%
2	Yokohama	35	34	97%	100%	94%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	31	89%	94%	83%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	33	94%	100%	88%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	30	86%	94%	76%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	34	97%	94%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	34	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	32	91%	89%	94%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	32	91%	88%	94%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	34	97%	94%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	32	91%	94%	88%
12	Urawa Reds	35	31	89%	89%	88%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	28	80%	76%	83%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	33	94%	88%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	35	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	33	94%	94%	94%
17	Tokyo	35	31	89%	89%	88%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	31	89%	89%	88%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	30	86%	88%	83%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	29	83%	71%	94%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	35	33	94%	100%	89%
2	Yokohama	35	35	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	35	33	94%	100%	89%
4	Fagiano Okayama	35	34	97%	100%	94%
5	Cerezo Osaka	35	31	89%	94%	82%
6	Tokyo Verdy	35	34	97%	94%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	35	34	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	35	33	94%	94%	94%
9	Shonan Bellmare	35	33	94%	88%	100%
10	Nagoya Grampus	35	34	97%	94%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	35	34	97%	100%	94%
12	Urawa Reds	35	34	97%	100%	94%
13	Gamba Osaka	35	31	89%	88%	89%
14	Kashima Antlers	35	34	97%	94%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	35	35	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	35	35	100%	100%	100%
17	Tokyo	35	35	100%	100%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	35	33	94%	94%	94%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	35	32	91%	88%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	35	29	83%	71%	94%

Average goals scored and conceded: Kashima Antlers

Knowing Kashima Antlers’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the J1 League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Kashima Antlers’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

46% of Kashima Antlers games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Kashima Antlers and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 54%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in Japanese League.

All of this information can help determine how Kashima Antlers’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.