Progresso vs Real Forte Querceta Both Teams Score Stats

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Prato	34	20	59%
2	Forlì	34	22	65%
3	Rimini	34	24	71%
4	Correggese	34	22	65%
5	Ghivizzano Borgo Mozzano	34	19	56%
6	Seravezza	34	21	62%
7	Real Forte Querceta	34	20	59%
8	Fiorenzuola	34	17	50%
9	Mezzolara	34	23	68%
10	Sammaurese	34	23	68%
11	Progresso	34	23	68%
12	Lentigione	34	17	50%
13	Aglianese	34	19	56%
14	Sasso Marconi Zola	34	20	59%
15	Bagnolese	34	24	71%
16	Corticella	34	23	68%
17	Marignanese	34	21	62%
18	Pro Livorno	34	24	71%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Prato

59%

Forlì

65%

Rimini

71%

Correggese

65%

Ghivizzano Borgo Mozzano

56%

Seravezza

62%

Real Forte Querceta

59%

Fiorenzuola

50%

Mezzolara

68%

Sammaurese

68%

Progresso

68%

Lentigione

50%

Aglianese

56%

Sasso Marconi Zola

59%

Bagnolese

71%

Corticella

68%

Marignanese

62%

Pro Livorno

71%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Prato	17	9	53%
2	Forlì	17	12	71%
3	Rimini	17	11	65%
4	Correggese	17	12	71%
5	Ghivizzano Borgo Mozzano	17	9	53%
6	Seravezza	17	11	65%
7	Real Forte Querceta	17	9	53%
8	Fiorenzuola	17	9	53%
9	Mezzolara	17	15	88%
10	Sammaurese	17	11	65%
11	Progresso	17	11	65%
12	Lentigione	17	9	53%
13	Aglianese	17	8	47%
14	Sasso Marconi Zola	17	10	59%
15	Bagnolese	17	10	59%
16	Corticella	17	14	82%
17	Marignanese	17	11	65%
18	Pro Livorno	17	10	59%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Prato

53%

Forlì

71%

Rimini

65%

Correggese

71%

Ghivizzano Borgo Mozzano

53%

Seravezza

65%

Real Forte Querceta

53%

Fiorenzuola

53%

Mezzolara

88%

Sammaurese

65%

Progresso

65%

Lentigione

53%

Aglianese

47%

Sasso Marconi Zola

59%

Bagnolese

59%

Corticella

82%

Marignanese

65%

Pro Livorno

59%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Prato	17	11	65%
2	Forlì	17	10	59%
3	Rimini	17	13	76%
4	Correggese	17	10	59%
5	Ghivizzano Borgo Mozzano	17	10	59%
6	Seravezza	17	10	59%
7	Real Forte Querceta	17	11	65%
8	Fiorenzuola	17	8	47%
9	Mezzolara	17	8	47%
10	Sammaurese	17	12	71%
11	Progresso	17	12	71%
12	Lentigione	17	8	47%
13	Aglianese	17	11	65%
14	Sasso Marconi Zola	17	10	59%
15	Bagnolese	17	14	82%
16	Corticella	17	9	53%
17	Marignanese	17	10	59%
18	Pro Livorno	17	14	82%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Prato

65%

Forlì

59%

Rimini

76%

Correggese

59%

Ghivizzano Borgo Mozzano

59%

Seravezza

59%

Real Forte Querceta

65%

Fiorenzuola

47%

Mezzolara

47%

Sammaurese

71%

Progresso

71%

Lentigione

47%

Aglianese

65%

Sasso Marconi Zola

59%

Bagnolese

82%

Corticella

53%

Marignanese

59%

Pro Livorno

82%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Progresso and Real Forte Querceta have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group D.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

In 34 matches played in the Serie D Group D, Progresso has scored and conceded goals in 23 matches. In other words, 68% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 65% at home, while it is 71% away from home.
Meanwhile, Real Forte Querceta has scored and conceded in 20 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie D Group D, giving them a BTTS rate of 59%. Both teams have scored in 9 of Real Forte Querceta’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 11 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets

Progresso 1 - 1 Real Forte Querceta

Both Teams to Score