Football statistics for Albirex Niigata

Team Info

Season

Country

Stadium

2025

Japan

Denka Big Swan Stadium

Competition

Japan

J1 League

Japan

J1 League

Japan

Emperor Cup

Summary Match Schedule Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	17	55%	40%	69%
2	Yokohama	30	9	30%	19%	43%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	11	37%	50%	25%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	10	33%	31%	36%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	17	55%	38%	73%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	9	30%	33%	27%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	17	55%	60%	50%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	11	35%	40%	31%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	16	52%	53%	50%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	19	61%	67%	56%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	13	42%	44%	40%
12	Urawa Reds	30	13	43%	44%	43%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	15	48%	53%	44%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	15	48%	50%	47%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	10	32%	33%	31%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	12	40%	33%	47%
17	Tokyo	31	14	45%	50%	40%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	15	48%	50%	47%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	11	35%	40%	31%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	20	65%	67%	63%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	31	100%	100%	100%
2	Yokohama	30	27	90%	94%	86%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	27	90%	93%	88%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	28	93%	94%	93%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	30	97%	100%	93%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	24	80%	100%	60%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	30	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	26	84%	80%	88%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	29	94%	93%	94%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	28	90%	87%	94%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	28	90%	81%	100%
12	Urawa Reds	30	27	90%	88%	93%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	30	97%	100%	94%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	31	100%	100%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	29	94%	93%	94%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	27	90%	87%	93%
17	Tokyo	31	30	97%	94%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	29	94%	88%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	28	90%	87%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	29	94%	93%	94%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	25	81%	73%	88%
2	Yokohama	30	17	57%	50%	64%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	21	70%	93%	50%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	17	57%	50%	64%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	26	84%	81%	87%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	12	40%	47%	33%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	22	71%	80%	63%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	16	52%	53%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	23	74%	67%	81%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	26	84%	87%	81%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	20	65%	75%	53%
12	Urawa Reds	30	20	67%	56%	79%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	20	65%	67%	63%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	20	65%	75%	53%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	16	52%	47%	56%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	16	53%	47%	60%
17	Tokyo	31	20	65%	63%	67%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	21	68%	69%	67%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	23	74%	67%	81%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	25	81%	80%	81%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	7	23%	20%	25%
2	Yokohama	30	2	7%	6%	7%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	6	20%	29%	13%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	3	10%	6%	14%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	10	32%	13%	53%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	4	13%	13%	13%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	7	23%	13%	31%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	6	19%	27%	13%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	7	23%	20%	25%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	5	16%	20%	13%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	6	19%	13%	27%
12	Urawa Reds	30	6	20%	19%	21%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	10	32%	27%	38%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	6	19%	25%	13%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	1	3%	0%	6%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	6	20%	20%	20%
17	Tokyo	31	8	26%	25%	27%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	8	26%	31%	20%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	5	16%	27%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	9	29%	47%	13%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	4	13%	13%	13%
2	Yokohama	30	1	3%	0%	7%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	3	10%	7%	13%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	2	7%	0%	14%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	5	16%	6%	27%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	1	3%	7%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	3	10%	13%	6%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	3	10%	13%	6%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	1	3%	7%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	2	6%	6%	7%
12	Urawa Reds	30	4	13%	13%	14%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	5	16%	13%	19%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	2	6%	13%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	2	7%	7%	7%
17	Tokyo	31	3	10%	6%	13%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	3	10%	13%	7%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	3	10%	13%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	4	13%	20%	6%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	2	6%	0%	13%
2	Yokohama	30	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	1	3%	0%	6%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	1	3%	0%	7%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	4	13%	6%	20%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	1	3%	7%	0%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	2	6%	7%	6%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	2	6%	13%	0%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	1	3%	7%	0%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	1	3%	0%	7%
12	Urawa Reds	30	1	3%	0%	7%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	3	10%	7%	13%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	1	3%	6%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	0	0%	0%	0%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Tokyo	31	0	0%	0%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	1	3%	6%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	2	6%	13%	0%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	4	13%	20%	6%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	14	45%	60%	31%
2	Yokohama	30	21	70%	81%	57%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	19	63%	50%	75%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	20	67%	69%	64%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	14	45%	63%	27%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	21	70%	67%	73%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	14	45%	40%	50%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	20	65%	60%	69%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	15	48%	47%	50%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	12	39%	33%	44%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	18	58%	56%	60%
12	Urawa Reds	30	17	57%	56%	57%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	16	52%	47%	56%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	16	52%	50%	53%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	21	68%	67%	69%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	18	60%	67%	53%
17	Tokyo	31	17	55%	50%	60%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	16	52%	50%	53%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	20	65%	60%	69%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	11	35%	33%	38%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Yokohama	30	3	10%	6%	14%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	3	10%	7%	13%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	2	7%	6%	7%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	1	3%	0%	7%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	6	20%	0%	40%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	5	16%	20%	13%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	2	6%	7%	6%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	3	10%	13%	6%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	3	10%	19%	0%
12	Urawa Reds	30	3	10%	13%	7%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	1	3%	0%	6%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	0	0%	0%	0%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	2	6%	7%	6%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	3	10%	13%	7%
17	Tokyo	31	1	3%	6%	0%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	2	6%	13%	0%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	3	10%	13%	6%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	2	6%	7%	6%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	6	19%	27%	13%
2	Yokohama	30	13	43%	50%	36%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	9	30%	7%	50%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	13	43%	50%	36%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	5	16%	19%	13%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	18	60%	53%	67%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	9	29%	20%	38%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	15	48%	47%	50%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	8	26%	33%	19%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	5	16%	13%	19%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	11	35%	25%	47%
12	Urawa Reds	30	10	33%	44%	21%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	11	35%	33%	38%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	11	35%	25%	47%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	15	48%	53%	44%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	14	47%	53%	40%
17	Tokyo	31	11	35%	38%	33%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	10	32%	31%	33%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	8	26%	33%	19%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	6	19%	20%	19%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	24	77%	80%	75%
2	Yokohama	30	28	93%	94%	93%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	24	80%	71%	88%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	27	90%	94%	86%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	21	68%	88%	47%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	26	87%	87%	87%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	24	77%	87%	69%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	25	81%	73%	88%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	24	77%	80%	75%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	26	84%	80%	88%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	25	81%	88%	73%
12	Urawa Reds	30	24	80%	81%	79%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	21	68%	73%	63%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	25	81%	75%	87%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	30	97%	100%	94%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	24	80%	80%	80%
17	Tokyo	31	23	74%	75%	73%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	23	74%	69%	80%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	26	84%	73%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	22	71%	53%	88%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	27	87%	87%	88%
2	Yokohama	30	29	97%	100%	93%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	27	90%	93%	88%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	28	93%	100%	86%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	26	84%	94%	73%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	29	97%	93%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	30	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	28	90%	87%	94%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	28	90%	87%	94%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	30	97%	93%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	29	94%	94%	93%
12	Urawa Reds	30	26	87%	88%	86%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	26	84%	87%	81%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	29	94%	88%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	31	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	28	93%	93%	93%
17	Tokyo	31	28	90%	94%	87%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	28	90%	88%	93%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	28	90%	87%	94%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	27	87%	80%	94%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Kyoto Sanga	31	29	94%	100%	88%
2	Yokohama	30	30	100%	100%	100%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	30	29	97%	100%	94%
4	Fagiano Okayama	30	29	97%	100%	93%
5	Cerezo Osaka	31	27	87%	94%	80%
6	Tokyo Verdy	30	29	97%	93%	100%
7	Machida Zelvia	31	30	97%	100%	94%
8	Avispa Fukuoka	31	29	94%	93%	94%
9	Shonan Bellmare	31	29	94%	87%	100%
10	Nagoya Grampus	31	30	97%	93%	100%
11	Yokohama F. Marinos	31	30	97%	100%	93%
12	Urawa Reds	30	29	97%	100%	93%
13	Gamba Osaka	31	28	90%	93%	88%
14	Kashima Antlers	31	30	97%	94%	100%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	31	31	100%	100%	100%
16	Vissel Kobe	30	30	100%	100%	100%
17	Tokyo	31	31	100%	100%	100%
18	Albirex Niigata	31	30	97%	94%	100%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	31	29	94%	87%	100%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	31	27	87%	80%	94%

Average goals scored and conceded: Albirex Niigata

Knowing Albirex Niigata’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the J1 League 2025 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Albirex Niigata’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

48% of Albirex Niigata games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Albirex Niigata and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 52%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in Japanese League.

All of this information can help determine how Albirex Niigata’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.