12.01.2020 - 13:30
Stadium : Stadio Matteo Legler
Finished
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Seregno | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Pontisola | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Pro Sesto | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Legnano | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Tritium | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Caravaggio | 27 | 4% | 4% | 0% |
7 | Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 27 | 11% | 7% | 4% |
8 | Folgore Caratese | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Nibionnoggiono | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Inveruno | 27 | 4% | 4% | 4% |
11 | Levico | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Castellanzese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Bustese Milano City FC SSD | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Virtus Bolzano | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Arconatese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Scanzorosciate | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Brusaporto | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Sondrio | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Dro Alto Garda | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Villa Valle | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Seregno | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Pontisola | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Pro Sesto | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Legnano | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Tritium | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Caravaggio | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 27 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
8 | Folgore Caratese | 27 | 4% | 4% | 0% |
9 | Nibionnoggiono | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Inveruno | 27 | 4% | 4% | 0% |
11 | Levico | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Castellanzese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Bustese Milano City FC SSD | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Virtus Bolzano | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Arconatese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Scanzorosciate | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Brusaporto | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Sondrio | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Dro Alto Garda | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Villa Valle | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Seregno | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Pontisola | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Pro Sesto | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Legnano | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Tritium | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Caravaggio | 27 | 4% | 4% | 4% |
7 | Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 27 | 11% | 7% | 0% |
8 | Folgore Caratese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | Nibionnoggiono | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Inveruno | 27 | 4% | 4% | 4% |
11 | Levico | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Castellanzese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Bustese Milano City FC SSD | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Virtus Bolzano | 27 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Arconatese | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Scanzorosciate | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Brusaporto | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Sondrio | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Dro Alto Garda | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Villa Valle | 27 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Pontisola vs Arconatese here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Pontisola vs Arconatese bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the Serie D Group B, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.