Favourite this Match
Correggese Team Logo

BTTS: Correggese vs Sasso Marconi

Sun, 26 October 2025 - 09:30

Sasso Marconi Team Logo

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

8 5 63%
2
Pistoiese Team Logo

Pistoiese

8 4 50%
3
Tuttocuoio Team Logo

Tuttocuoio

8 3 38%
4
Imolese Team Logo

Imolese

8 2 25%
5
Correggese Team Logo

Correggese

8 4 50%
6
Pro Sesto Team Logo

Pro Sesto

8 3 38%
7
Crema Team Logo

Crema

8 3 38%
8
Progresso Team Logo

Progresso

8 4 50%
9
Sasso Marconi Team Logo

Sasso Marconi

8 3 38%
10
Lentigione Team Logo

Lentigione

8 2 25%
11
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

8 4 50%
12
Sangiuliano City Team Logo

Sangiuliano City

8 5 63%
13
Sant'Angelo Team Logo

Sant'Angelo

8 3 38%
14
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

8 3 38%
15
Cittadella Vis Modena Team Logo

Cittadella Vis Modena

8 5 63%
16
Rovato Vertovese Team Logo

Rovato Vertovese

8 2 25%
17
Tropical Coriano Team Logo

Tropical Coriano

8 5 63%
18
Trevigliese Team Logo

Trevigliese

8 6 75%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

4 2 50%
2
Pistoiese Team Logo

Pistoiese

4 2 50%
3
Tuttocuoio Team Logo

Tuttocuoio

4 1 25%
4
Imolese Team Logo

Imolese

4 1 25%
5
Correggese Team Logo

Correggese

4 2 50%
6
Pro Sesto Team Logo

Pro Sesto

4 2 50%
7
Crema Team Logo

Crema

4 2 50%
8
Progresso Team Logo

Progresso

4 1 25%
9
Sasso Marconi Team Logo

Sasso Marconi

4 1 25%
10
Lentigione Team Logo

Lentigione

4 0 0%
11
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

4 3 75%
12
Sangiuliano City Team Logo

Sangiuliano City

4 4 100%
13
Sant'Angelo Team Logo

Sant'Angelo

4 1 25%
14
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

4 1 25%
15
Cittadella Vis Modena Team Logo

Cittadella Vis Modena

4 4 100%
16
Rovato Vertovese Team Logo

Rovato Vertovese

4 1 25%
17
Tropical Coriano Team Logo

Tropical Coriano

4 1 25%
18
Trevigliese Team Logo

Trevigliese

4 4 100%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

4 3 75%
2
Pistoiese Team Logo

Pistoiese

4 2 50%
3
Tuttocuoio Team Logo

Tuttocuoio

4 2 50%
4
Imolese Team Logo

Imolese

4 1 25%
5
Correggese Team Logo

Correggese

4 2 50%
6
Pro Sesto Team Logo

Pro Sesto

4 1 25%
7
Crema Team Logo

Crema

4 1 25%
8
Progresso Team Logo

Progresso

4 3 75%
9
Sasso Marconi Team Logo

Sasso Marconi

4 2 50%
10
Lentigione Team Logo

Lentigione

4 2 50%
11
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

4 1 25%
12
Sangiuliano City Team Logo

Sangiuliano City

4 1 25%
13
Sant'Angelo Team Logo

Sant'Angelo

4 2 50%
14
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

4 2 50%
15
Cittadella Vis Modena Team Logo

Cittadella Vis Modena

4 1 25%
16
Rovato Vertovese Team Logo

Rovato Vertovese

4 1 25%
17
Tropical Coriano Team Logo

Tropical Coriano

4 4 100%
18
Trevigliese Team Logo

Trevigliese

4 2 50%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Correggese and Sasso Marconi have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group D.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 8 matches played in the Serie D Group D, Correggese has scored and conceded goals in 4 matches. In other words, 50% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 50% at home, while it is 50% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Sasso Marconi has scored and conceded in 3 of their 8 matches so far in the Serie D Group D, giving them a BTTS rate of 38%. Both teams have scored in 1 of Sasso Marconi’s 4 home matches, and it has happened 2 times in 4 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets