Season
Country
Stadium
2022
China
Langfang City Sports Center
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 76% |
| 2 |
Shandong Luneng |
34 | 74% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 68% |
| 4 |
Shanghai SIPG |
34 | 62% |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
34 | 59% |
| 6 |
Henan Jianye |
34 | 56% |
| 7 |
Beijing Guoan |
34 | 53% |
| 8 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 53% |
| 9 |
Dalian Yifang |
34 | 50% |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
34 | 47% |
| 11 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 44% |
| 12 |
Changchun Yatai |
34 | 41% |
| 13 |
Tianjin Teda |
34 | 38% |
| 14 |
Wuhan Zall |
34 | 35% |
| 15 |
Guangzhou R&F |
34 | 29% |
| 16 |
Shenzhen |
34 | 26% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 88% |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 82% |
| 3 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 71% |
| 4 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 65% |
| 5 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 59% |
| 6 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 59% |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 59% |
| 8 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 59% |
| 9 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 53% |
| 10 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 47% |
| 11 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 47% |
| 12 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 41% |
| 13 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 35% |
| 14 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 35% |
| 15 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 29% |
| 16 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 29% |
| 17 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Scoring First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 71% |
| 2 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 65% |
| 3 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 59% |
| 4 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 59% |
| 5 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 59% |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 59% |
| 7 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 53% |
| 8 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 53% |
| 9 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 47% |
| 10 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 47% |
| 11 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 47% |
| 12 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 35% |
| 13 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 35% |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 29% |
| 15 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 29% |
| 16 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hebei CFFC |
34 | 91% |
| 2 |
Shenzhen |
34 | 71% |
| 3 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
34 | 65% |
| 4 |
Guangzhou R&F |
34 | 65% |
| 5 |
Wuhan Zall |
34 | 62% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda |
34 | 56% |
| 7 |
Dalian Yifang |
34 | 47% |
| 8 |
Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 44% |
| 9 |
Changchun Yatai |
34 | 44% |
| 10 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
34 | 44% |
| 11 |
Beijing Guoan |
34 | 41% |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye |
34 | 38% |
| 13 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
34 | 32% |
| 14 |
Shanghai SIPG |
34 | 32% |
| 15 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 32% |
| 16 |
Hangzhou |
34 | 26% |
| 17 |
Shandong Luneng |
34 | 26% |
| 18 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 88% |
| 2 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 76% |
| 3 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 65% |
| 4 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 59% |
| 5 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 53% |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 47% |
| 7 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 47% |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 47% |
| 9 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 41% |
| 10 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 41% |
| 11 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 41% |
| 12 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 35% |
| 13 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 35% |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 35% |
| 15 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Conceding First |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 94% |
| 2 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 76% |
| 3 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 76% |
| 4 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 65% |
| 5 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 65% |
| 6 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 53% |
| 7 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 53% |
| 8 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 47% |
| 9 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 47% |
| 10 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 41% |
| 11 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 41% |
| 12 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 41% |
| 13 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 41% |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 35% |
| 15 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 29% |
| 16 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 29% |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 29% |
| 18 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 29% |
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.