Season
2022
Country
China
Stadium
Langfang City Sports Center
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 17 | 52% | 53% | 50% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 16 | 48% | 29% | 69% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 14 | 42% | 31% | 53% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 18 | 55% | 71% | 38% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 13 | 39% | 38% | 41% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 23 | 70% | 65% | 75% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 26 | 79% | 75% | 82% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 17 | 52% | 35% | 69% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 22 | 67% | 69% | 65% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 19 | 58% | 63% | 53% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 12 | 36% | 31% | 41% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 16 | 48% | 53% | 44% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 21 | 64% | 59% | 69% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 20 | 61% | 59% | 63% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 25 | 76% | 82% | 69% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 17 | 52% | 63% | 41% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 24 | 73% | 81% | 65% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 14 | 42% | 56% | 29% |
# | Team | MP | Over 0.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 28 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 30 | 91% | 82% | 100% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 31 | 94% | 88% | 100% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 28 | 85% | 82% | 88% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 28 | 85% | 81% | 88% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 21 | 64% | 59% | 69% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 28 | 85% | 76% | 94% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 23 | 70% | 69% | 71% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 27 | 82% | 76% | 88% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 82% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 23 | 70% | 59% | 81% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 26 | 79% | 81% | 76% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 25 | 76% | 75% | 76% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 23 | 70% | 65% | 75% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 81% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 20 | 61% | 69% | 53% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 22 | 67% | 75% | 59% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 9 | 27% | 41% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 8 | 24% | 6% | 44% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 4 | 12% | 13% | 12% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 6 | 18% | 6% | 29% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 14 | 42% | 41% | 44% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 19 | 58% | 69% | 47% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 13 | 39% | 24% | 56% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 13 | 39% | 44% | 35% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 7 | 21% | 25% | 18% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 4 | 12% | 0% | 24% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 7 | 21% | 18% | 25% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 9 | 27% | 24% | 31% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 9 | 27% | 18% | 38% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 11 | 33% | 29% | 38% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 8 | 24% | 31% | 18% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 15 | 45% | 69% | 24% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 6 | 18% | 38% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 7 | 21% | 29% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 7 | 21% | 0% | 44% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 3 | 9% | 12% | 6% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 6 | 18% | 18% | 19% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 12 | 36% | 38% | 35% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 8 | 24% | 25% | 24% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 5 | 15% | 19% | 12% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 5 | 15% | 6% | 25% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 13% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 6 | 18% | 6% | 31% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 19% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 5 | 15% | 25% | 6% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 9 | 27% | 56% | 0% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 3 | 9% | 19% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 4 | 12% | 18% | 6% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 19% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 6 | 18% | 25% | 12% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 3 | 9% | 0% | 19% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 3 | 9% | 13% | 6% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 5 | 15% | 31% | 0% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 16 | 48% | 47% | 50% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 17 | 52% | 71% | 31% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 19 | 58% | 69% | 47% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 15 | 45% | 29% | 63% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 20 | 61% | 63% | 59% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 10 | 30% | 35% | 25% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 7 | 21% | 25% | 18% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 16 | 48% | 65% | 31% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 11 | 33% | 31% | 35% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 14 | 42% | 38% | 47% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 21 | 64% | 69% | 59% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 17 | 52% | 47% | 56% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 12 | 36% | 41% | 31% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 13 | 39% | 41% | 38% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 8 | 24% | 18% | 31% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 16 | 48% | 38% | 59% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 9 | 27% | 19% | 35% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 19 | 58% | 44% | 71% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 13% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 3 | 9% | 18% | 0% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 13% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 2 | 6% | 12% | 0% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 5 | 15% | 18% | 13% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 2 | 6% | 0% | 12% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 2 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 1 | 3% | 6% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 5 | 15% | 19% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 12 | 36% | 41% | 31% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 5 | 15% | 24% | 6% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 10 | 30% | 31% | 29% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 8 | 24% | 24% | 25% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 4 | 12% | 13% | 12% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 6 | 18% | 24% | 13% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 5 | 15% | 13% | 18% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 10 | 30% | 41% | 19% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 3 | 9% | 6% | 12% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 7 | 21% | 19% | 24% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 8 | 24% | 25% | 24% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 10 | 30% | 35% | 25% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 1 | 3% | 0% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 4 | 12% | 12% | 13% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 5 | 15% | 12% | 19% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 13 | 39% | 31% | 47% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 4 | 12% | 6% | 18% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 11 | 33% | 25% | 41% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 24 | 73% | 59% | 88% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 25 | 76% | 94% | 56% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 29 | 88% | 88% | 88% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 27 | 82% | 94% | 71% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 19 | 58% | 59% | 56% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 14 | 42% | 31% | 53% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 20 | 61% | 76% | 44% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 20 | 61% | 56% | 65% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 26 | 79% | 75% | 82% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 29 | 88% | 100% | 76% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 26 | 79% | 82% | 75% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 24 | 73% | 76% | 69% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 24 | 73% | 82% | 63% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 22 | 67% | 71% | 63% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 25 | 76% | 69% | 82% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 18 | 55% | 31% | 76% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 27 | 82% | 63% | 100% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 26 | 79% | 71% | 88% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 26 | 79% | 100% | 56% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 30 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 27 | 82% | 82% | 81% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 21 | 64% | 63% | 65% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 25 | 76% | 76% | 75% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 25 | 76% | 75% | 76% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 28 | 85% | 81% | 88% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 28 | 85% | 94% | 75% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 30 | 91% | 94% | 88% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 27 | 82% | 94% | 69% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 28 | 85% | 88% | 81% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 28 | 85% | 75% | 94% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 24 | 73% | 44% | 100% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 30 | 91% | 81% | 100% |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Overall | Home | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 29 | 88% | 82% | 94% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 30 | 91% | 100% | 81% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 27 | 82% | 75% | 88% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 31 | 94% | 100% | 88% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 29 | 88% | 94% | 82% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 32 | 97% | 100% | 94% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 31 | 94% | 94% | 94% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 30 | 91% | 100% | 81% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 33 | 100% | 100% | 100% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 30 | 91% | 88% | 94% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 28 | 85% | 69% | 100% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 32 | 97% | 94% | 100% |
Knowing Hebei CFFC’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the Chinese Super League 2022 on both ends of the pitch.
Check out some of the Hebei CFFC’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:
This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in Chinese Super League.
All of this information can help determine how Hebei CFFC’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.
However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.