Season
2022
Country
China
Stadium
Langfang City Sports Center
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 48% | 39% | 21% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 36% | 18% | 3% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 36% | 21% | 9% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 45% | 33% | 21% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 61% | 55% | 33% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 45% | 30% | 15% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 21% | 9% | 3% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 36% | 15% | 9% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 42% | 30% | 15% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 39% | 21% | 9% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 52% | 39% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 39% | 33% | 12% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 52% | 42% | 12% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 36% | 24% | 3% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 30% | 12% | 3% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 48% | 30% | 21% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 42% | 33% | 15% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 52% | 33% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 58% | 33% | 15% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 52% | 24% | 6% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 33% | 9% | 3% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 58% | 30% | 15% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 58% | 39% | 27% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 48% | 24% | 6% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 24% | 12% | 3% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 27% | 15% | 6% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 55% | 21% | 9% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 42% | 33% | 9% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 55% | 36% | 12% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 36% | 18% | 9% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 58% | 24% | 6% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 42% | 12% | 3% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 48% | 18% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 52% | 33% | 18% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 39% | 15% | 6% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 52% | 30% | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 45% | 21% | 15% |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 36% | 12% | 3% |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 48% | 24% | 9% |
4 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 67% | 18% | 6% |
5 | Hangzhou | 33 | 67% | 42% | 9% |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 55% | 36% | 15% |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 27% | 15% | 6% |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 42% | 21% | 12% |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 42% | 24% | 6% |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 45% | 12% | 3% |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 33% | 21% | 9% |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 58% | 39% | 9% |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 45% | 33% | 12% |
14 | Shenzhen | 33 | 52% | 21% | 6% |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 30% | 12% | 0% |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 42% | 18% | 9% |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 48% | 27% | 21% |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 52% | 30% | 15% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Hebei CFFC’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 12% of their games played so far in the Chinese Super League 2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Hebei CFFC’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 27% of their Chinese Super League matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Hebei CFFC this season in the Chinese Super League:
You can follow the Hebei CFFC’s card situation in Chinese Super League all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.