Season
2019/20
Country
Italy
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Seregno |
27 | 12 | 44% |
2 |
![]() Pontisola |
27 | 10 | 37% |
3 |
![]() Pro Sesto |
27 | 16 | 59% |
4 |
![]() Legnano |
27 | 13 | 48% |
5 |
![]() Tritium |
27 | 17 | 63% |
6 |
![]() Caravaggio |
27 | 18 | 67% |
7 |
![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo |
27 | 17 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Folgore Caratese |
27 | 12 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Nibionnoggiono |
27 | 15 | 56% |
10 |
![]() Inveruno |
27 | 17 | 63% |
11 |
![]() Levico |
27 | 16 | 59% |
12 |
![]() Castellanzese |
27 | 18 | 67% |
13 |
![]() Bustese Milano City FC SSD |
27 | 14 | 52% |
14 |
![]() Virtus Bolzano |
27 | 16 | 59% |
15 |
![]() Arconatese |
27 | 16 | 59% |
16 |
![]() Scanzorosciate |
27 | 14 | 52% |
17 |
![]() Brusaporto |
27 | 10 | 37% |
18 |
![]() Sondrio |
27 | 15 | 56% |
19 |
![]() Dro Alto Garda |
27 | 10 | 37% |
20 |
![]() Villa Valle |
27 | 18 | 67% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Seregno |
14 | 6 | 43% |
2 |
![]() Pontisola |
13 | 4 | 31% |
3 |
![]() Pro Sesto |
13 | 7 | 54% |
4 |
![]() Legnano |
14 | 8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Tritium |
14 | 8 | 57% |
6 |
![]() Caravaggio |
13 | 10 | 77% |
7 |
![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo |
14 | 10 | 71% |
8 |
![]() Folgore Caratese |
13 | 5 | 38% |
9 |
![]() Nibionnoggiono |
13 | 7 | 54% |
10 |
![]() Inveruno |
13 | 5 | 38% |
11 |
![]() Levico |
13 | 7 | 54% |
12 |
![]() Castellanzese |
13 | 11 | 85% |
13 |
![]() Bustese Milano City FC SSD |
13 | 8 | 62% |
14 |
![]() Virtus Bolzano |
14 | 9 | 64% |
15 |
![]() Arconatese |
14 | 11 | 79% |
16 |
![]() Scanzorosciate |
13 | 6 | 46% |
17 |
![]() Brusaporto |
14 | 2 | 14% |
18 |
![]() Sondrio |
14 | 7 | 50% |
19 |
![]() Dro Alto Garda |
14 | 6 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Villa Valle |
14 | 10 | 71% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Seregno |
13 | 6 | 46% |
2 |
![]() Pontisola |
14 | 6 | 43% |
3 |
![]() Pro Sesto |
14 | 9 | 64% |
4 |
![]() Legnano |
13 | 5 | 38% |
5 |
![]() Tritium |
13 | 9 | 69% |
6 |
![]() Caravaggio |
14 | 8 | 57% |
7 |
![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo |
13 | 7 | 54% |
8 |
![]() Folgore Caratese |
14 | 7 | 50% |
9 |
![]() Nibionnoggiono |
14 | 8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Inveruno |
14 | 12 | 86% |
11 |
![]() Levico |
14 | 9 | 64% |
12 |
![]() Castellanzese |
14 | 7 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Bustese Milano City FC SSD |
14 | 6 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Virtus Bolzano |
13 | 7 | 54% |
15 |
![]() Arconatese |
13 | 5 | 38% |
16 |
![]() Scanzorosciate |
14 | 8 | 57% |
17 |
![]() Brusaporto |
13 | 8 | 62% |
18 |
![]() Sondrio |
13 | 8 | 62% |
19 |
![]() Dro Alto Garda |
13 | 4 | 31% |
20 |
![]() Villa Valle |
13 | 8 | 62% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Bustese Milano City FC SSD’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Serie D Group B 2019/2020 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Bustese Milano City FC SSD in the competition:
You can also see Bustese Milano City FC SSD’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.