Season
2021/22
Country
Italy
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Olginatese |
38 | 20 | 53% |
2 |
![]() Pontisola |
38 | 22 | 58% |
3 |
![]() Legnano |
38 | 17 | 45% |
4 |
![]() Caravaggio |
38 | 24 | 63% |
5 |
![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo |
38 | 30 | 79% |
6 |
![]() Folgore Caratese |
38 | 24 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Castellanzese |
38 | 25 | 66% |
8 |
![]() Arconatese |
38 | 28 | 74% |
9 |
![]() Brusaporto |
38 | 28 | 74% |
10 |
![]() Villa Valle |
38 | 22 | 58% |
11 |
![]() Crema |
38 | 22 | 58% |
12 |
![]() Breno |
38 | 23 | 61% |
13 |
![]() Franciacorta |
38 | 30 | 79% |
14 |
![]() Sona |
38 | 20 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Desenzano Calvina |
38 | 27 | 71% |
16 |
![]() Casatese |
38 | 22 | 58% |
17 |
![]() Real Calepina |
38 | 14 | 37% |
18 |
![]() Vis Nova Giussano |
38 | 26 | 68% |
19 |
![]() Leon |
38 | 25 | 66% |
20 |
![]() Sangiuliano City |
38 | 21 | 55% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Olginatese |
19 | 12 | 63% |
2 |
![]() Pontisola |
19 | 7 | 37% |
3 |
![]() Legnano |
19 | 9 | 47% |
4 |
![]() Caravaggio |
19 | 9 | 47% |
5 |
![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo |
19 | 14 | 74% |
6 |
![]() Folgore Caratese |
19 | 12 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Castellanzese |
19 | 12 | 63% |
8 |
![]() Arconatese |
19 | 15 | 79% |
9 |
![]() Brusaporto |
19 | 12 | 63% |
10 |
![]() Villa Valle |
19 | 15 | 79% |
11 |
![]() Crema |
19 | 12 | 63% |
12 |
![]() Breno |
19 | 13 | 68% |
13 |
![]() Franciacorta |
19 | 14 | 74% |
14 |
![]() Sona |
19 | 6 | 32% |
15 |
![]() Desenzano Calvina |
19 | 12 | 63% |
16 |
![]() Casatese |
19 | 14 | 74% |
17 |
![]() Real Calepina |
19 | 7 | 37% |
18 |
![]() Vis Nova Giussano |
19 | 14 | 74% |
19 |
![]() Leon |
19 | 16 | 84% |
20 |
![]() Sangiuliano City |
19 | 10 | 53% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Olginatese |
19 | 8 | 42% |
2 |
![]() Pontisola |
19 | 15 | 79% |
3 |
![]() Legnano |
19 | 8 | 42% |
4 |
![]() Caravaggio |
19 | 15 | 79% |
5 |
![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo |
19 | 16 | 84% |
6 |
![]() Folgore Caratese |
19 | 12 | 63% |
7 |
![]() Castellanzese |
19 | 13 | 68% |
8 |
![]() Arconatese |
19 | 13 | 68% |
9 |
![]() Brusaporto |
19 | 16 | 84% |
10 |
![]() Villa Valle |
19 | 7 | 37% |
11 |
![]() Crema |
19 | 10 | 53% |
12 |
![]() Breno |
19 | 10 | 53% |
13 |
![]() Franciacorta |
19 | 16 | 84% |
14 |
![]() Sona |
19 | 14 | 74% |
15 |
![]() Desenzano Calvina |
19 | 15 | 79% |
16 |
![]() Casatese |
19 | 8 | 42% |
17 |
![]() Real Calepina |
19 | 7 | 37% |
18 |
![]() Vis Nova Giussano |
19 | 12 | 63% |
19 |
![]() Leon |
19 | 9 | 47% |
20 |
![]() Sangiuliano City |
19 | 11 | 58% |
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Vis Nova Giussano’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Serie D Group B 2021/2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Vis Nova Giussano in the competition:
You can also see Vis Nova Giussano’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.