# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() York City | 7 | 3 | 43% |
2 | ![]() Ebbsfleet United | 7 | 1 | 14% |
3 | ![]() Maidstone United | 6 | 1 | 17% |
4 | ![]() Fylde | 7 | 4 | 57% |
5 | ![]() Gateshead | 8 | 3 | 38% |
6 | ![]() Chester | 8 | 3 | 38% |
7 | ![]() Guiseley | 7 | 1 | 14% |
8 | ![]() Southport | 8 | 2 | 25% |
9 | ![]() Braintree Town | 8 | 1 | 13% |
10 | ![]() Kidderminster Harriers | 8 | 3 | 38% |
11 | ![]() Welling United | 5 | 0 | 0% |
12 | ![]() Alfreton Town | 7 | 0 | 0% |
13 | ![]() Dartford | 12 | 6 | 50% |
14 | ![]() AFC Telford United | 9 | 3 | 33% |
15 | ![]() Bath City | 5 | 1 | 20% |
16 | ![]() Curzon Ashton | 8 | 2 | 25% |
17 | ![]() Chorley | 7 | 1 | 14% |
18 | ![]() St Albans City | 8 | 3 | 38% |
19 | ![]() Eastbourne Borough | 11 | 1 | 9% |
20 | ![]() Concord Rangers | 5 | 0 | 0% |
21 | ![]() Brackley Town | 9 | 2 | 22% |
22 | ![]() Boston United | 6 | 2 | 33% |
23 | ![]() Chelmsford City | 8 | 1 | 13% |
24 | ![]() Hemel Hempstead Town | 9 | 1 | 11% |
25 | ![]() Bradford Park Avenue | 9 | 2 | 22% |
26 | ![]() Hungerford Town | 8 | 3 | 38% |
27 | ![]() Gloucester City | 10 | 2 | 20% |
28 | ![]() Oxford City | 10 | 6 | 60% |
29 | ![]() Darlington | 5 | 2 | 40% |
30 | ![]() Hampton & Richmond | 8 | 2 | 25% |
31 | ![]() Havant & Waterlooville | 9 | 1 | 11% |
32 | ![]() Leamington | 8 | 1 | 13% |
33 | ![]() Blyth Spartans | 7 | 0 | 0% |
34 | ![]() Chippenham Town | 7 | 1 | 14% |
35 | ![]() Spennymoor Town | 6 | 0 | 0% |
36 | ![]() Tonbridge Angels | 7 | 2 | 29% |
37 | ![]() Billericay Town | 11 | 2 | 18% |
38 | ![]() Slough Town | 7 | 1 | 14% |
39 | ![]() Kettering Town | 6 | 1 | 17% |
40 | ![]() Dorking Wanderers | 10 | 3 | 30% |
41 | ![]() Dulwich Hamlet | 4 | 1 | 25% |
42 | ![]() Hereford | 7 | 1 | 14% |
43 | ![]() Farsley Celtic | 8 | 3 | 38% |
# | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() York City | 6 | 1 | 17% |
2 | ![]() Ebbsfleet United | 11 | 3 | 27% |
3 | ![]() Maidstone United | 7 | 1 | 14% |
4 | ![]() Fylde | 8 | 2 | 25% |
5 | ![]() Gateshead | 6 | 0 | 0% |
6 | ![]() Chester | 9 | 1 | 11% |
7 | ![]() Guiseley | 8 | 1 | 13% |
8 | ![]() Southport | 6 | 3 | 50% |
9 | ![]() Braintree Town | 8 | 2 | 25% |
10 | ![]() Kidderminster Harriers | 7 | 3 | 43% |
11 | ![]() Welling United | 9 | 1 | 11% |
12 | ![]() Alfreton Town | 8 | 1 | 13% |
13 | ![]() Dartford | 7 | 2 | 29% |
14 | ![]() AFC Telford United | 8 | 1 | 13% |
15 | ![]() Bath City | 8 | 0 | 0% |
16 | ![]() Curzon Ashton | 9 | 0 | 0% |
17 | ![]() Chorley | 11 | 3 | 27% |
18 | ![]() St Albans City | 7 | 5 | 71% |
19 | ![]() Eastbourne Borough | 8 | 1 | 13% |
20 | ![]() Concord Rangers | 9 | 1 | 11% |
21 | ![]() Brackley Town | 7 | 2 | 29% |
22 | ![]() Boston United | 7 | 5 | 71% |
23 | ![]() Chelmsford City | 8 | 3 | 38% |
24 | ![]() Hemel Hempstead Town | 9 | 1 | 11% |
25 | ![]() Bradford Park Avenue | 7 | 2 | 29% |
26 | ![]() Hungerford Town | 11 | 4 | 36% |
27 | ![]() Gloucester City | 8 | 2 | 25% |
28 | ![]() Oxford City | 7 | 0 | 0% |
29 | ![]() Darlington | 6 | 2 | 33% |
30 | ![]() Hampton & Richmond | 9 | 6 | 67% |
31 | ![]() Havant & Waterlooville | 5 | 1 | 20% |
32 | ![]() Leamington | 7 | 1 | 14% |
33 | ![]() Blyth Spartans | 7 | 1 | 14% |
34 | ![]() Chippenham Town | 7 | 3 | 43% |
35 | ![]() Spennymoor Town | 7 | 2 | 29% |
36 | ![]() Tonbridge Angels | 7 | 3 | 43% |
37 | ![]() Billericay Town | 6 | 0 | 0% |
38 | ![]() Slough Town | 5 | 1 | 20% |
39 | ![]() Kettering Town | 8 | 1 | 13% |
40 | ![]() Dorking Wanderers | 8 | 3 | 38% |
41 | ![]() Dulwich Hamlet | 9 | 2 | 22% |
42 | ![]() Hereford | 6 | 4 | 67% |
43 | ![]() Farsley Celtic | 9 | 1 | 11% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for York City vs Leamington:
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.