# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chambly |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Épinal |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Colmar |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Furiani-Agliani |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Bastia-Borgo |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() St-Pryvé St-Hilaire |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Beauvais |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Dieppe |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Wasquehal |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Haguenau |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Chantilly |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Biesheim |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Feignies-Aulnoye |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Blois |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Bourges Foot 18 |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Thionville Lusitanos |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chambly |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Épinal |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Colmar |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Furiani-Agliani |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Bastia-Borgo |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() St-Pryvé St-Hilaire |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Beauvais |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Dieppe |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Wasquehal |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Haguenau |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Chantilly |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Biesheim |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Feignies-Aulnoye |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Blois |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Bourges Foot 18 |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Thionville Lusitanos |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chambly |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Épinal |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Colmar |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Furiani-Agliani |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Bastia-Borgo |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() St-Pryvé St-Hilaire |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Beauvais |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Dieppe |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Wasquehal |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Haguenau |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() Chantilly |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Biesheim |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Feignies-Aulnoye |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Blois |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Bourges Foot 18 |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() Thionville Lusitanos |
2 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Check out all the card statistics for Wasquehal vs Beauvais here. Studying the number of cards a team receives over the course of a match and a season gives a good sense of a team’s level of discipline.
For this match, the card stat situation of both teams is as follows:
Card statistics for Wasquehal vs Beauvais bring a different angle for analysing the match. It offers a deeper look at the dynamics during their matches and highlights the two club's potential problems when it comes to possibly going a man down.
And if you'd like to learn more about the card averages of these two teams or other clubs in the National 2 Group B, just check out the table above.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.