Favourite this Match

Varesina 3 - 2 Desenzano Calvina

05.11.2023 - 08:30

Finished

Both Teams to Score

#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

381950%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

381642%
3
Legnano Team Logo

Legnano

381437%
4
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

381642%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

381642%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

382155%
7
Folgore Caratese Team Logo

Folgore Caratese

382053%
8
Castellanzese Team Logo

Castellanzese

381950%
9
Arconatese Team Logo

Arconatese

381847%
10
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

382155%
11
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

381745%
12
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

381745%
13
Crema Team Logo

Crema

381026%
14
Varesina Team Logo

Varesina

382053%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

381745%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

382361%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

381745%
18
Clivense Team Logo

Clivense

381950%
19
Club Milano Team Logo

Club Milano

382053%
20
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

381437%
#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

19842%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

19737%
3
Legnano Team Logo

Legnano

19737%
4
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

19842%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

19947%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

191158%
7
Folgore Caratese Team Logo

Folgore Caratese

191158%
8
Castellanzese Team Logo

Castellanzese

19947%
9
Arconatese Team Logo

Arconatese

191263%
10
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

191158%
11
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

191053%
12
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

19526%
13
Crema Team Logo

Crema

19421%
14
Varesina Team Logo

Varesina

19842%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

191158%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

191368%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

19842%
18
Clivense Team Logo

Clivense

191263%
19
Club Milano Team Logo

Club Milano

191053%
20
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

19316%
#TeamMPBTTSBTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

191158%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

19947%
3
Legnano Team Logo

Legnano

19737%
4
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

19842%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

19737%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

191053%
7
Folgore Caratese Team Logo

Folgore Caratese

19947%
8
Castellanzese Team Logo

Castellanzese

191053%
9
Arconatese Team Logo

Arconatese

19632%
10
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

191053%
11
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

19737%
12
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

191263%
13
Crema Team Logo

Crema

19632%
14
Varesina Team Logo

Varesina

191263%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

19632%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

191053%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

19947%
18
Clivense Team Logo

Clivense

19737%
19
Club Milano Team Logo

Club Milano

191053%
20
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

191158%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Varesina and Desenzano Calvina have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group B.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 38 matches played in the Serie D Group B, Varesina has scored and conceded goals in 20 matches. In other words, 53% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 42% at home, while it is 63% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Desenzano Calvina has scored and conceded in 17 of their 38 matches so far in the Serie D Group B, giving them a BTTS rate of 45%. Both teams have scored in 11 of Desenzano Calvina’s 19 home matches, and it has happened 6 times in 19 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets