# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Piacenza | 37 | 18 | 49% |
2 | ![]() Pontisola | 37 | 16 | 43% |
3 | ![]() Legnano | 37 | 13 | 35% |
4 | ![]() Tritium | 37 | 15 | 41% |
5 | ![]() Caravaggio | 37 | 15 | 41% |
6 | ![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 37 | 20 | 54% |
7 | ![]() Folgore Caratese | 37 | 20 | 54% |
8 | ![]() Castellanzese | 37 | 18 | 49% |
9 | ![]() Arconatese | 37 | 18 | 49% |
10 | ![]() Brusaporto | 37 | 20 | 54% |
11 | ![]() Villa Valle | 37 | 16 | 43% |
12 | ![]() Caldiero Terme | 37 | 16 | 43% |
13 | ![]() Crema | 37 | 10 | 27% |
14 | ![]() Varesina | 37 | 19 | 51% |
15 | ![]() Desenzano Calvina | 37 | 16 | 43% |
16 | ![]() Casatese | 37 | 23 | 62% |
17 | ![]() Real Calepina | 37 | 17 | 46% |
18 | ![]() Clivense | 37 | 19 | 51% |
19 | ![]() Club Milano | 37 | 20 | 54% |
20 | ![]() Pro Palazzolo | 37 | 13 | 35% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Piacenza | 19 | 8 | 42% |
2 | ![]() Pontisola | 19 | 7 | 37% |
3 | ![]() Legnano | 19 | 7 | 37% |
4 | ![]() Tritium | 18 | 7 | 39% |
5 | ![]() Caravaggio | 18 | 8 | 44% |
6 | ![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 18 | 10 | 56% |
7 | ![]() Folgore Caratese | 18 | 11 | 61% |
8 | ![]() Castellanzese | 18 | 8 | 44% |
9 | ![]() Arconatese | 18 | 12 | 67% |
10 | ![]() Brusaporto | 19 | 11 | 58% |
11 | ![]() Villa Valle | 18 | 9 | 50% |
12 | ![]() Caldiero Terme | 19 | 5 | 26% |
13 | ![]() Crema | 19 | 4 | 21% |
14 | ![]() Varesina | 18 | 7 | 39% |
15 | ![]() Desenzano Calvina | 19 | 11 | 58% |
16 | ![]() Casatese | 18 | 13 | 72% |
17 | ![]() Real Calepina | 18 | 8 | 44% |
18 | ![]() Clivense | 19 | 12 | 63% |
19 | ![]() Club Milano | 19 | 10 | 53% |
20 | ![]() Pro Palazzolo | 19 | 3 | 16% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Piacenza | 18 | 10 | 56% |
2 | ![]() Pontisola | 18 | 9 | 50% |
3 | ![]() Legnano | 18 | 6 | 33% |
4 | ![]() Tritium | 19 | 8 | 42% |
5 | ![]() Caravaggio | 19 | 7 | 37% |
6 | ![]() Virtus Ciserano Bergamo | 19 | 10 | 53% |
7 | ![]() Folgore Caratese | 19 | 9 | 47% |
8 | ![]() Castellanzese | 19 | 10 | 53% |
9 | ![]() Arconatese | 19 | 6 | 32% |
10 | ![]() Brusaporto | 18 | 9 | 50% |
11 | ![]() Villa Valle | 19 | 7 | 37% |
12 | ![]() Caldiero Terme | 18 | 11 | 61% |
13 | ![]() Crema | 18 | 6 | 33% |
14 | ![]() Varesina | 19 | 12 | 63% |
15 | ![]() Desenzano Calvina | 18 | 5 | 28% |
16 | ![]() Casatese | 19 | 10 | 53% |
17 | ![]() Real Calepina | 19 | 9 | 47% |
18 | ![]() Clivense | 18 | 7 | 39% |
19 | ![]() Club Milano | 18 | 10 | 56% |
20 | ![]() Pro Palazzolo | 18 | 10 | 56% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Piacenza and Castellanzese have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group B.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.