Lucchese 1 - 2 Pontedera
07.11.2015 - 11:30
Stadium: Stadio Porta Elisa
Finished
Clean Sheet
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Catania |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| 2 |
Benevento |
36 | 19 | 53% |
| 3 |
Pisa |
39 | 16 | 41% |
| 4 |
Cittadella |
36 | 10 | 28% |
| 5 |
SPAL |
36 | 17 | 47% |
| 6 |
Juve Stabia |
34 | 7 | 21% |
| 7 |
Robur Siena |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| 8 |
Foggia |
39 | 15 | 38% |
| 9 |
Cremonese |
34 | 12 | 35% |
| 10 |
Südtirol |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 11 |
Calcio Padova |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| 12 |
Giana Erminio |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 13 |
Pro Piacenza |
36 | 12 | 33% |
| 14 |
Casertana |
35 | 12 | 34% |
| 15 |
Renate |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| 16 |
Paganese |
34 | 9 | 26% |
| 17 |
Prato |
36 | 10 | 28% |
| 18 |
Matera |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| 19 |
Lecce |
37 | 18 | 49% |
| 20 |
Pistoiese |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 21 |
Pordenone |
37 | 15 | 41% |
| 22 |
AlbinoLeffe |
36 | 7 | 19% |
| 23 |
Santarcangelo |
34 | 9 | 26% |
| 24 |
Arezzo |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| 25 |
Teramo |
34 | 8 | 24% |
| 26 |
Monopoli |
36 | 10 | 28% |
| 27 |
US Alessandria |
35 | 14 | 40% |
| 28 |
Cosenza |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| 29 |
Cuneo |
36 | 9 | 25% |
| 30 |
Bassano Virtus |
35 | 15 | 43% |
| 31 |
FeralpiSalò |
34 | 8 | 24% |
| 32 |
Lucchese |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 33 |
Catanzaro |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 34 |
Akragas |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 35 |
Pontedera |
34 | 12 | 35% |
| 36 |
Fidelis Andria |
34 | 20 | 59% |
| 37 |
Reggiana |
34 | 17 | 50% |
| 38 |
Carrarese |
34 | 10 | 29% |
| 39 |
Melfi |
36 | 8 | 22% |
| 40 |
Maceratese |
35 | 11 | 31% |
| 41 |
Lupa Roma |
36 | 8 | 22% |
| 42 |
Mantova |
36 | 15 | 42% |
| 43 |
Messina |
34 | 12 | 35% |
| 44 |
Ancona 1905 |
34 | 14 | 41% |
| 45 |
Lumezzane |
34 | 7 | 21% |
| 46 |
Tuttocuoio |
34 | 13 | 38% |
| 47 |
Martina Franca |
36 | 7 | 19% |
| 48 |
Savona |
34 | 11 | 32% |
| 49 |
Pro Patria |
34 | 5 | 15% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Catania |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 2 |
Benevento |
18 | 12 | 67% |
| 3 |
Pisa |
20 | 10 | 50% |
| 4 |
Cittadella |
18 | 4 | 22% |
| 5 |
SPAL |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 6 |
Juve Stabia |
17 | 2 | 12% |
| 7 |
Robur Siena |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 8 |
Foggia |
20 | 9 | 45% |
| 9 |
Cremonese |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 10 |
Südtirol |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 11 |
Calcio Padova |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 12 |
Giana Erminio |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 13 |
Pro Piacenza |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 14 |
Casertana |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 15 |
Renate |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 16 |
Paganese |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 17 |
Prato |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 18 |
Matera |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 19 |
Lecce |
19 | 11 | 58% |
| 20 |
Pistoiese |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 21 |
Pordenone |
19 | 9 | 47% |
| 22 |
AlbinoLeffe |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 23 |
Santarcangelo |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 24 |
Arezzo |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 25 |
Teramo |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 26 |
Monopoli |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 27 |
US Alessandria |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 28 |
Cosenza |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 29 |
Cuneo |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 30 |
Bassano Virtus |
17 | 10 | 59% |
| 31 |
FeralpiSalò |
17 | 3 | 18% |
| 32 |
Lucchese |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 33 |
Catanzaro |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 34 |
Akragas |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 35 |
Pontedera |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 36 |
Fidelis Andria |
17 | 11 | 65% |
| 37 |
Reggiana |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 38 |
Carrarese |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 39 |
Melfi |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 40 |
Maceratese |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 41 |
Lupa Roma |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 42 |
Mantova |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 43 |
Messina |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 44 |
Ancona 1905 |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 45 |
Lumezzane |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 46 |
Tuttocuoio |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 47 |
Martina Franca |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 48 |
Savona |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 49 |
Pro Patria |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Catania |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 2 |
Benevento |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 3 |
Pisa |
19 | 6 | 32% |
| 4 |
Cittadella |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 5 |
SPAL |
18 | 10 | 56% |
| 6 |
Juve Stabia |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 7 |
Robur Siena |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 8 |
Foggia |
19 | 6 | 32% |
| 9 |
Cremonese |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 10 |
Südtirol |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 11 |
Calcio Padova |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 12 |
Giana Erminio |
17 | 7 | 41% |
| 13 |
Pro Piacenza |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 14 |
Casertana |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 15 |
Renate |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 16 |
Paganese |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 17 |
Prato |
18 | 4 | 22% |
| 18 |
Matera |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 19 |
Lecce |
18 | 7 | 39% |
| 20 |
Pistoiese |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 21 |
Pordenone |
18 | 6 | 33% |
| 22 |
AlbinoLeffe |
18 | 2 | 11% |
| 23 |
Santarcangelo |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 24 |
Arezzo |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 25 |
Teramo |
17 | 2 | 12% |
| 26 |
Monopoli |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 27 |
US Alessandria |
18 | 8 | 44% |
| 28 |
Cosenza |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 29 |
Cuneo |
18 | 3 | 17% |
| 30 |
Bassano Virtus |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 31 |
FeralpiSalò |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 32 |
Lucchese |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 33 |
Catanzaro |
17 | 3 | 18% |
| 34 |
Akragas |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 35 |
Pontedera |
17 | 4 | 24% |
| 36 |
Fidelis Andria |
17 | 9 | 53% |
| 37 |
Reggiana |
17 | 8 | 47% |
| 38 |
Carrarese |
17 | 3 | 18% |
| 39 |
Melfi |
18 | 3 | 17% |
| 40 |
Maceratese |
18 | 5 | 28% |
| 41 |
Lupa Roma |
18 | 3 | 17% |
| 42 |
Mantova |
18 | 8 | 44% |
| 43 |
Messina |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 44 |
Ancona 1905 |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 45 |
Lumezzane |
17 | 2 | 12% |
| 46 |
Tuttocuoio |
17 | 6 | 35% |
| 47 |
Martina Franca |
18 | 1 | 6% |
| 48 |
Savona |
17 | 5 | 29% |
| 49 |
Pro Patria |
17 | 1 | 6% |
The number of clean sheets, or matches a team has without conceding a single goal, in a competition is a strong indicator of how well their defence is playing. The more times a team can completely keep their opponents from scoring, the more likely it is the team’s actual ability rather than just random chance.
We keep track of all the clean sheet information here, and these are the stats for Lucchese vs Pontedera:
- Lucchese has played 34 matches and kept opponents from scoring a single goal in 11 of them. In other words, they have kept a clean sheet in 32% of their matches.
- In 17 home matches in the Serie C, Lucchese has had 7 matches without conceding a goal. Pontedera has played 34 matches and has shut out opponents on 12 occasions. That means they have held clean sheets in 35% of their matches.
- In 17 home matches played in the Serie C, Pontedera has had 4 matches without conceding a single goal. And away from home, they have a 24% clean sheet rate as the visiting side.
If both clubs have a high rate of keeping clean sheets, then there’s a decent chance of seeing a low-scoring battle between two strong defensive clubs. But for matches between clubs with low rates of clean sheets, then it’s fair to expect a goal or two.