# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Olimpo | 7 | 3 | 43% |
2 | ![]() Crucero del Norte | 7 | 2 | 29% |
3 | ![]() Boca Unidos | 6 | 1 | 17% |
4 | ![]() Deportivo Santamarina | 7 | 3 | 43% |
5 | ![]() Estudiantes de San Luis | 7 | 6 | 86% |
6 | ![]() Douglas Haig | 6 | 1 | 17% |
7 | ![]() Juventud Unida Univ. | 7 | 2 | 29% |
8 | ![]() Villa Mitre | 7 | 3 | 43% |
9 | ![]() Juventud Antoniana | 6 | 2 | 33% |
10 | ![]() Sportivo Belgrano | 6 | 2 | 33% |
11 | ![]() Sportivo Las Parejas | 6 | 4 | 67% |
12 | ![]() Cipolletti | 7 | 1 | 14% |
13 | ![]() Gutiérrez | 7 | 3 | 43% |
14 | ![]() Sarmiento Resistencia | 6 | 3 | 50% |
15 | ![]() Huracán Las Heras | 7 | 2 | 29% |
16 | ![]() Gimnasia Concepción | 6 | 2 | 33% |
17 | ![]() Defensores Belgrano VR | 6 | 2 | 33% |
18 | ![]() Unión Sunchales | 6 | 4 | 67% |
19 | ![]() Def. de Pronunciamiento | 7 | 2 | 29% |
20 | ![]() Sansinena | 7 | 1 | 14% |
21 | ![]() Ferro Carril Oeste LP | 7 | 3 | 43% |
22 | ![]() Sol de América | 7 | 2 | 29% |
23 | ![]() Independiente Chivilcoy | 6 | 3 | 50% |
24 | ![]() Deportivo Camioneros | 7 | 1 | 14% |
25 | ![]() Deportivo Rincón | 7 | 2 | 29% |
26 | ![]() San Martín Formosa | 6 | 1 | 17% |
27 | ![]() Sol de Mayo | 7 | 2 | 29% |
28 | ![]() Central Norte | 6 | 3 | 50% |
29 | ![]() Kimberley Mar del Plata | 7 | 3 | 43% |
30 | ![]() Germinal de Rawson | 7 | 3 | 43% |
31 | ![]() San Martín Mendoza | 6 | 0 | 0% |
32 | ![]() Sarmiento de La Banda | 6 | 2 | 33% |
33 | ![]() Atenas | 7 | 3 | 43% |
34 | ![]() El Linqueño | 7 | 1 | 14% |
35 | ![]() 9 de Julio Rafaela | 6 | 1 | 17% |
36 | ![]() Circulo Deportivo | 7 | 4 | 57% |
37 | ![]() Ciudad de Bolívar | 7 | 1 | 14% |
38 | ![]() Argentino Monte Maíz | 7 | 3 | 43% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Olimpo | 7 | 3 | 43% |
2 | ![]() Crucero del Norte | 6 | 3 | 50% |
3 | ![]() Boca Unidos | 6 | 4 | 67% |
4 | ![]() Deportivo Santamarina | 7 | 1 | 14% |
5 | ![]() Estudiantes de San Luis | 7 | 3 | 43% |
6 | ![]() Douglas Haig | 7 | 3 | 43% |
7 | ![]() Juventud Unida Univ. | 7 | 2 | 29% |
8 | ![]() Villa Mitre | 7 | 1 | 14% |
9 | ![]() Juventud Antoniana | 6 | 0 | 0% |
10 | ![]() Sportivo Belgrano | 7 | 0 | 0% |
11 | ![]() Sportivo Las Parejas | 6 | 2 | 33% |
12 | ![]() Cipolletti | 7 | 3 | 43% |
13 | ![]() Gutiérrez | 7 | 4 | 57% |
14 | ![]() Sarmiento Resistencia | 6 | 1 | 17% |
15 | ![]() Huracán Las Heras | 6 | 3 | 50% |
16 | ![]() Gimnasia Concepción | 6 | 2 | 33% |
17 | ![]() Defensores Belgrano VR | 6 | 2 | 33% |
18 | ![]() Unión Sunchales | 6 | 1 | 17% |
19 | ![]() Def. de Pronunciamiento | 6 | 2 | 33% |
20 | ![]() Sansinena | 7 | 4 | 57% |
21 | ![]() Ferro Carril Oeste LP | 7 | 2 | 29% |
22 | ![]() Sol de América | 6 | 2 | 33% |
23 | ![]() Independiente Chivilcoy | 6 | 1 | 17% |
24 | ![]() Deportivo Camioneros | 7 | 2 | 29% |
25 | ![]() Deportivo Rincón | 7 | 1 | 14% |
26 | ![]() San Martín Formosa | 7 | 2 | 29% |
27 | ![]() Sol de Mayo | 7 | 2 | 29% |
28 | ![]() Central Norte | 6 | 3 | 50% |
29 | ![]() Kimberley Mar del Plata | 7 | 3 | 43% |
30 | ![]() Germinal de Rawson | 7 | 3 | 43% |
31 | ![]() San Martín Mendoza | 7 | 1 | 14% |
32 | ![]() Sarmiento de La Banda | 7 | 4 | 57% |
33 | ![]() Atenas | 7 | 3 | 43% |
34 | ![]() El Linqueño | 6 | 1 | 17% |
35 | ![]() 9 de Julio Rafaela | 6 | 5 | 83% |
36 | ![]() Circulo Deportivo | 7 | 4 | 57% |
37 | ![]() Ciudad de Bolívar | 7 | 3 | 43% |
38 | ![]() Argentino Monte Maíz | 7 | 1 | 14% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Gimnasia Concepción and 9 de Julio Rafaela have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Torneo Federal A.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.