# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Milton Keynes Dons | 48 | 30 | 63% |
2 | ![]() Doncaster Rovers | 48 | 26 | 54% |
3 | ![]() Swindon Town | 46 | 33 | 72% |
4 | ![]() Walsall | 46 | 32 | 70% |
5 | ![]() Gillingham | 46 | 20 | 43% |
6 | ![]() AFC Wimbledon | 46 | 21 | 46% |
7 | ![]() Bradford City | 46 | 24 | 52% |
8 | ![]() Crewe Alexandra | 49 | 26 | 53% |
9 | ![]() Colchester United | 46 | 32 | 70% |
10 | ![]() Crawley Town | 49 | 29 | 59% |
11 | ![]() Notts County | 46 | 32 | 70% |
12 | ![]() Tranmere Rovers | 46 | 28 | 61% |
13 | ![]() Accrington Stanley | 46 | 27 | 59% |
14 | ![]() Newport County | 46 | 25 | 54% |
15 | ![]() Mansfield Town | 46 | 30 | 65% |
16 | ![]() Morecambe | 46 | 29 | 63% |
17 | ![]() Grimsby Town | 46 | 28 | 61% |
18 | ![]() Forest Green Rovers | 46 | 18 | 39% |
19 | ![]() Sutton United | 46 | 31 | 67% |
20 | ![]() Barrow | 46 | 27 | 59% |
21 | ![]() Wrexham | 46 | 23 | 50% |
22 | ![]() Harrogate Town | 46 | 26 | 57% |
23 | ![]() Salford City | 46 | 31 | 67% |
24 | ![]() Stockport County | 46 | 26 | 57% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Milton Keynes Dons | 24 | 17 | 71% |
2 | ![]() Doncaster Rovers | 24 | 10 | 42% |
3 | ![]() Swindon Town | 23 | 16 | 70% |
4 | ![]() Walsall | 23 | 15 | 65% |
5 | ![]() Gillingham | 23 | 11 | 48% |
6 | ![]() AFC Wimbledon | 23 | 12 | 52% |
7 | ![]() Bradford City | 23 | 12 | 52% |
8 | ![]() Crewe Alexandra | 24 | 12 | 50% |
9 | ![]() Colchester United | 23 | 19 | 83% |
10 | ![]() Crawley Town | 25 | 15 | 60% |
11 | ![]() Notts County | 23 | 16 | 70% |
12 | ![]() Tranmere Rovers | 23 | 16 | 70% |
13 | ![]() Accrington Stanley | 23 | 11 | 48% |
14 | ![]() Newport County | 23 | 16 | 70% |
15 | ![]() Mansfield Town | 23 | 13 | 57% |
16 | ![]() Morecambe | 23 | 14 | 61% |
17 | ![]() Grimsby Town | 23 | 15 | 65% |
18 | ![]() Forest Green Rovers | 23 | 8 | 35% |
19 | ![]() Sutton United | 23 | 17 | 74% |
20 | ![]() Barrow | 23 | 11 | 48% |
21 | ![]() Wrexham | 23 | 11 | 48% |
22 | ![]() Harrogate Town | 23 | 13 | 57% |
23 | ![]() Salford City | 23 | 19 | 83% |
24 | ![]() Stockport County | 23 | 8 | 35% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ![]() Milton Keynes Dons | 24 | 13 | 54% |
2 | ![]() Doncaster Rovers | 24 | 16 | 67% |
3 | ![]() Swindon Town | 23 | 17 | 74% |
4 | ![]() Walsall | 23 | 17 | 74% |
5 | ![]() Gillingham | 23 | 9 | 39% |
6 | ![]() AFC Wimbledon | 23 | 9 | 39% |
7 | ![]() Bradford City | 23 | 12 | 52% |
8 | ![]() Crewe Alexandra | 25 | 14 | 56% |
9 | ![]() Colchester United | 23 | 13 | 57% |
10 | ![]() Crawley Town | 24 | 14 | 58% |
11 | ![]() Notts County | 23 | 16 | 70% |
12 | ![]() Tranmere Rovers | 23 | 12 | 52% |
13 | ![]() Accrington Stanley | 23 | 16 | 70% |
14 | ![]() Newport County | 23 | 9 | 39% |
15 | ![]() Mansfield Town | 23 | 17 | 74% |
16 | ![]() Morecambe | 23 | 15 | 65% |
17 | ![]() Grimsby Town | 23 | 13 | 57% |
18 | ![]() Forest Green Rovers | 23 | 10 | 43% |
19 | ![]() Sutton United | 23 | 14 | 61% |
20 | ![]() Barrow | 23 | 16 | 70% |
21 | ![]() Wrexham | 23 | 12 | 52% |
22 | ![]() Harrogate Town | 23 | 13 | 57% |
23 | ![]() Salford City | 23 | 12 | 52% |
24 | ![]() Stockport County | 23 | 18 | 78% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Doncaster Rovers and Wrexham have both scored and conceded in the same match in the EFL League Two.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.