Wuhan Three Towns Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

2026

China

Competition

China

Chinese Super League

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai Shenhua	17	88%	82%	71%	65%	59%	47%	29%	11.76
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	100%	88%	71%	59%	59%	29%	29%	11.71
3	Dalian Zhixing	17	88%	71%	59%	47%	41%	35%	29%	10.94
4	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	76%	59%	53%	53%	29%	18%	10.76
5	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	65%	47%	47%	47%	35%	24%	10.65
6	Hangzhou	17	76%	65%	47%	41%	41%	29%	24%	10.36
7	Tianjin Teda	17	71%	59%	35%	29%	29%	29%	29%	10.35
8	Chongqing Tongliang Long	17	82%	65%	53%	47%	35%	24%	18%	10.23
9	Qingdao Youth Island	17	82%	65%	47%	35%	29%	24%	18%	10.17
10	Wuhan Three Towns	17	88%	65%	41%	24%	24%	24%	18%	10.12
11	Henan Jianye	17	71%	53%	41%	35%	35%	29%	18%	10.05
12	Shanghai SIPG	17	65%	53%	47%	35%	29%	24%	18%	9.88
13	Qingdao Jonoon	17	65%	59%	53%	47%	41%	24%	12%	9.59
14	Shandong Luneng	17	76%	65%	41%	35%	29%	12%	6%	9.47
15	Yunnan Yukun	17	71%	53%	41%	24%	24%	24%	12%	9.41
16	Shenyang Urban	17	82%	53%	35%	24%	24%	18%	6%	9.12

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai Shenhua	9	89%	78%	78%	78%	67%	44%	22%	11.78
2	Wuhan Three Towns	7	100%	86%	71%	43%	43%	43%	29%	11.57
3	Hangzhou	8	100%	88%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	11.51
4	Shanghai SIPG	8	63%	63%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	11.26
5	Sichuan Jiuniu	9	100%	89%	67%	44%	44%	22%	22%	11
6	Henan Jianye	8	75%	50%	50%	38%	38%	25%	25%	10.38
7	Qingdao Youth Island	9	89%	67%	56%	33%	33%	22%	22%	10.23
8	Beijing Guoan	9	78%	67%	44%	44%	44%	22%	11%	10.22
9	Chongqing Tongliang Long	9	78%	56%	44%	44%	44%	22%	22%	10.11
10	Chengdu Better City FC	8	63%	50%	38%	38%	38%	25%	13%	9.88
11	Dalian Zhixing	9	89%	67%	44%	33%	22%	11%	11%	9.78
12	Qingdao Jonoon	9	67%	67%	56%	44%	33%	22%	11%	9.77
13	Yunnan Yukun	8	63%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	13%	9.75
14	Tianjin Teda	9	67%	44%	22%	22%	22%	22%	22%	9.33
15	Shenyang Urban	9	78%	56%	44%	33%	33%	33%	11%	9.33
16	Shandong Luneng	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	13%	0%	9.01

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	100%	88%	75%	75%	75%	38%	38%	12.51
2	Dalian Zhixing	8	88%	75%	75%	63%	63%	63%	50%	12.26
3	Shanghai Shenhua	8	88%	88%	63%	50%	50%	50%	38%	11.75
4	Tianjin Teda	8	75%	75%	50%	38%	38%	38%	38%	11.51
5	Beijing Guoan	8	88%	88%	75%	63%	63%	38%	25%	11.38
6	Chengdu Better City FC	9	100%	78%	56%	56%	56%	44%	33%	11.33
7	Chongqing Tongliang Long	8	88%	75%	63%	50%	25%	25%	13%	10.38
8	Qingdao Youth Island	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	25%	25%	13%	10.13
9	Shandong Luneng	9	78%	67%	44%	33%	33%	11%	11%	9.89
10	Henan Jianye	9	67%	56%	33%	33%	33%	33%	11%	9.78
11	Qingdao Jonoon	8	63%	50%	50%	50%	50%	25%	13%	9.38
12	Hangzhou	9	56%	44%	44%	44%	44%	22%	11%	9.33
13	Yunnan Yukun	9	78%	56%	44%	11%	11%	11%	11%	9.11
14	Wuhan Three Towns	10	80%	50%	20%	10%	10%	10%	10%	9.1
15	Shenyang Urban	8	88%	50%	25%	13%	13%	0%	0%	8.88
16	Shanghai SIPG	9	67%	44%	44%	33%	22%	11%	0%	8.66

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	82%	65%	65%	65%	47%	29%	6.94
3	Chengdu Better City FC	17	94%	94%	71%	53%	41%	35%	29%	6.59
4	Dalian Zhixing	17	88%	82%	76%	76%	47%	24%	12%	6.29
5	Shanghai Shenhua	17	94%	71%	53%	53%	47%	29%	29%	6
6	Hangzhou	17	82%	76%	76%	47%	35%	24%	24%	5.65
7	Shanghai SIPG	17	82%	71%	53%	35%	29%	24%	24%	5.59
8	Henan Jianye	17	76%	71%	47%	35%	29%	24%	24%	5.29
9	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	88%	76%	53%	41%	35%	29%	12%	5.24
10	Shandong Luneng	17	88%	71%	47%	29%	12%	6%	6%	4.47
11	Tianjin Teda	17	76%	41%	35%	29%	24%	12%	12%	4.47
12	Yunnan Yukun	17	88%	65%	47%	29%	12%	12%	6%	4.47
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	65%	53%	35%	6%	0%	0%	4.41
14	Qingdao Youth Island	17	82%	47%	41%	41%	29%	6%	0%	4.41
15	Qingdao Jonoon	17	71%	59%	35%	29%	29%	18%	6%	4.35
16	Shenyang Urban	17	82%	65%	35%	29%	24%	6%	0%	4.24
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	17	65%	47%	24%	24%	12%	6%	6%	3.88

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shanghai Shenhua	9	100%	89%	78%	78%	78%	44%	44%	7.56
3	Hangzhou	8	100%	100%	100%	75%	50%	50%	50%	7.38
4	Beijing Guoan	9	78%	78%	56%	56%	56%	44%	33%	7.11
5	Shanghai SIPG	8	100%	88%	63%	38%	38%	38%	38%	6.88
6	Henan Jianye	8	88%	88%	50%	50%	50%	38%	38%	6.75
7	Dalian Zhixing	9	89%	78%	78%	78%	56%	33%	11%	6.67
8	Chengdu Better City FC	8	88%	88%	63%	50%	25%	25%	25%	6.25
9	Yunnan Yukun	8	100%	88%	75%	38%	25%	25%	13%	5.75
10	Sichuan Jiuniu	9	89%	78%	56%	44%	44%	44%	11%	5.56
11	Shandong Luneng	8	100%	88%	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	5.38
12	Wuhan Three Towns	7	100%	86%	71%	43%	14%	0%	0%	5.14
13	Chongqing Tongliang Long	9	67%	56%	44%	44%	22%	11%	11%	4.78
14	Qingdao Youth Island	9	89%	56%	44%	44%	33%	11%	0%	4.67
15	Qingdao Jonoon	9	67%	67%	33%	33%	33%	11%	0%	4.33
16	Shenyang Urban	9	89%	67%	33%	22%	11%	0%	0%	4.11
17	Tianjin Teda	9	67%	44%	33%	33%	22%	0%	0%	3.89

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Chengdu Better City FC	9	100%	100%	78%	56%	56%	44%	33%	6.89
3	Beijing Guoan	8	88%	88%	75%	75%	75%	50%	25%	6.75
4	Dalian Zhixing	8	88%	88%	75%	75%	38%	13%	13%	5.88
5	Tianjin Teda	8	88%	38%	38%	25%	25%	25%	25%	5.13
6	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	88%	75%	50%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.88
7	Shanghai SIPG	9	67%	56%	44%	33%	22%	11%	11%	4.44
8	Qingdao Jonoon	8	75%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	13%	4.38
9	Shenyang Urban	8	75%	63%	38%	38%	38%	13%	0%	4.38
10	Shanghai Shenhua	8	88%	50%	25%	25%	13%	13%	13%	4.25
11	Qingdao Youth Island	8	75%	38%	38%	38%	25%	0%	0%	4.13
12	Hangzhou	9	67%	56%	56%	22%	22%	0%	0%	4.11
13	Henan Jianye	9	67%	56%	44%	22%	11%	11%	11%	4
14	Wuhan Three Towns	10	70%	50%	40%	30%	0%	0%	0%	3.9
15	Shandong Luneng	9	78%	56%	33%	22%	0%	0%	0%	3.67
16	Yunnan Yukun	9	78%	44%	22%	22%	0%	0%	0%	3.33
17	Chongqing Tongliang Long	8	63%	38%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.88

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	17	88%	82%	76%	65%	53%	35%	24%	6.47
3	Chongqing Tongliang Long	17	76%	71%	65%	59%	53%	47%	24%	6.35
4	Tianjin Teda	17	88%	82%	65%	47%	29%	18%	18%	5.88
5	Shanghai Shenhua	17	94%	88%	59%	47%	29%	24%	18%	5.76
6	Qingdao Youth Island	17	100%	76%	71%	53%	35%	12%	12%	5.76
7	Wuhan Three Towns	17	94%	71%	47%	47%	41%	18%	18%	5.71
8	Qingdao Jonoon	17	88%	76%	59%	41%	29%	18%	18%	5.24
9	Shandong Luneng	17	88%	71%	47%	29%	18%	18%	12%	5
10	Yunnan Yukun	17	76%	71%	41%	35%	29%	18%	6%	4.94
11	Shenyang Urban	17	71%	53%	41%	41%	29%	29%	29%	4.88
12	Henan Jianye	17	88%	65%	35%	35%	18%	18%	12%	4.76
13	Hangzhou	17	76%	65%	53%	47%	35%	6%	6%	4.71
14	Dalian Zhixing	17	71%	65%	47%	35%	29%	12%	6%	4.65
15	Shanghai SIPG	17	76%	59%	41%	41%	18%	6%	0%	4.29
16	Chengdu Better City FC	17	76%	41%	29%	18%	18%	12%	6%	4.06
17	Beijing Guoan	17	71%	47%	35%	12%	12%	12%	12%	3.82

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Wuhan Three Towns	7	100%	86%	57%	57%	57%	29%	29%	6.43
3	Qingdao Youth Island	9	100%	67%	67%	56%	44%	11%	11%	5.56
4	Tianjin Teda	9	89%	78%	67%	44%	33%	22%	22%	5.44
5	Qingdao Jonoon	9	100%	78%	67%	44%	33%	11%	11%	5.44
6	Sichuan Jiuniu	9	89%	78%	67%	56%	44%	22%	11%	5.44
7	Chongqing Tongliang Long	9	67%	56%	56%	44%	33%	33%	11%	5.33
8	Shenyang Urban	9	67%	56%	44%	44%	33%	33%	33%	5.22
9	Shanghai SIPG	8	88%	63%	38%	38%	13%	0%	0%	4.38
10	Shanghai Shenhua	9	89%	89%	33%	11%	0%	0%	0%	4.22
11	Hangzhou	8	75%	50%	38%	38%	25%	13%	13%	4.13
12	Yunnan Yukun	8	63%	50%	38%	25%	25%	13%	0%	4
13	Henan Jianye	8	88%	38%	25%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.63
14	Shandong Luneng	8	75%	50%	25%	25%	0%	0%	0%	3.63
15	Chengdu Better City FC	8	75%	38%	13%	13%	13%	13%	0%	3.63
16	Beijing Guoan	9	44%	33%	22%	11%	11%	11%	11%	3.11
17	Dalian Zhixing	9	44%	33%	33%	11%	0%	0%	0%	3.11

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Sichuan Jiuniu	8	88%	88%	88%	75%	63%	50%	38%	7.63
3	Shanghai Shenhua	8	100%	88%	88%	88%	63%	50%	38%	7.5
4	Chongqing Tongliang Long	8	88%	88%	75%	75%	75%	63%	38%	7.5
5	Tianjin Teda	8	88%	88%	63%	50%	25%	13%	13%	6.38
6	Dalian Zhixing	8	100%	100%	63%	63%	63%	25%	13%	6.38
7	Shandong Luneng	9	100%	89%	67%	33%	33%	33%	22%	6.22
8	Qingdao Youth Island	8	100%	88%	75%	50%	25%	13%	13%	6
9	Henan Jianye	9	89%	89%	44%	44%	33%	33%	22%	5.78
10	Yunnan Yukun	9	89%	89%	44%	44%	33%	22%	11%	5.78
11	Hangzhou	9	78%	78%	67%	56%	44%	0%	0%	5.22
12	Wuhan Three Towns	10	90%	60%	40%	40%	30%	10%	10%	5.2
13	Qingdao Jonoon	8	75%	75%	50%	38%	25%	25%	25%	5
14	Beijing Guoan	8	100%	63%	50%	13%	13%	13%	13%	4.63
15	Shenyang Urban	8	75%	50%	38%	38%	25%	25%	25%	4.5
16	Chengdu Better City FC	9	78%	44%	44%	22%	22%	11%	11%	4.44
17	Shanghai SIPG	9	67%	56%	44%	44%	22%	11%	0%	4.22

Corner Statistics for Wuhan Three Towns: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Wuhan Three Towns across the 2026 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Wuhan Three Towns Corner Averages (Chinese Super League)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Wuhan Three Towns provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Wuhan Three Towns, based on the most up-to-date data from the Chinese Super League:

Matches involving Wuhan Three Towns average 10.12 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
41.18% of matches featuring Wuhan Three Towns in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Wuhan Three Towns records 4.41 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 35.29% of games, Wuhan Three Towns registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Wuhan Three Towns concedes an average of 5.71 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Wuhan Three Towns in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Wuhan Three Towns, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Wuhan Three Towns?

According to the data, Wuhan Three Towns averages 4.41 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Wuhan Three Towns matches?

In the Chinese Super League, matches involving Wuhan Three Towns average 10.12 total corners per game.