Football statistics for Tritium

Team Info

Season

2023/24

Country

Italy

Competition

Italy

Serie D Group B

Summary Match Results Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Overall
Home
Away

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	38	61%	55%	53%	50%	34%	24%	18%	11.72
2	Caldiero Terme	38	61%	53%	47%	39%	37%	26%	21%	10.78
3	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	45%	42%	37%	29%	24%	13%	11%	10.67
4	Castellanzese	38	50%	47%	39%	37%	26%	18%	16%	10.29
5	Club Milano	38	66%	55%	39%	26%	18%	5%	5%	10.11
6	Piacenza	38	61%	50%	39%	32%	26%	21%	13%	10.1
7	Arconatese	38	55%	53%	34%	29%	21%	21%	13%	10.04
8	Villa Valle	38	61%	47%	42%	32%	16%	8%	5%	10
9	Real Calepina	38	37%	32%	26%	18%	18%	13%	13%	9.9
10	Clivense	38	66%	61%	42%	32%	21%	16%	8%	9.74
11	Pontisola	38	53%	42%	37%	26%	24%	16%	13%	9.73
12	Brusaporto	38	55%	50%	42%	32%	26%	18%	18%	9.69
13	Legnano	38	47%	47%	29%	24%	18%	8%	5%	9.46
14	Folgore Caratese	38	47%	32%	29%	18%	11%	5%	5%	9.2
15	Desenzano Calvina	38	50%	45%	29%	21%	18%	8%	8%	9.16
16	Varesina	38	45%	37%	26%	24%	21%	11%	5%	9.08
17	Pro Palazzolo	38	47%	39%	21%	13%	11%	8%	5%	9.08
18	Crema	38	24%	21%	13%	8%	5%	5%	5%	8.93
19	Casatese	38	37%	32%	24%	16%	11%	3%	3%	8.8
20	Tritium	38	45%	34%	24%	21%	13%	5%	3%	8.73

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	19	47%	47%	47%	47%	32%	21%	16%	11.46
2	Caldiero Terme	19	74%	68%	63%	58%	53%	37%	32%	12.13
3	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	32%	32%	32%	26%	21%	5%	0%	10.57
4	Castellanzese	19	63%	63%	58%	53%	42%	32%	26%	11.73
5	Club Milano	19	63%	53%	21%	5%	0%	0%	0%	8.92
6	Piacenza	19	84%	68%	63%	58%	47%	37%	21%	11.47
7	Arconatese	19	63%	58%	37%	26%	21%	21%	21%	11
8	Villa Valle	19	63%	47%	42%	42%	26%	11%	5%	10.47
9	Real Calepina	19	32%	32%	26%	11%	11%	11%	11%	10.26
10	Clivense	19	68%	63%	47%	26%	16%	5%	5%	9.12
11	Pontisola	19	42%	37%	37%	21%	16%	11%	11%	9.14
12	Brusaporto	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	16%	16%	16%	8.67
13	Legnano	19	53%	53%	32%	26%	21%	5%	5%	9.5
14	Folgore Caratese	19	42%	26%	21%	11%	11%	0%	0%	8.29
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	47%	42%	26%	16%	16%	11%	11%	8.88
16	Varesina	19	47%	42%	32%	32%	26%	21%	11%	9.64
17	Pro Palazzolo	19	53%	42%	26%	16%	11%	5%	0%	8.86
18	Crema	19	11%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	7.25
19	Casatese	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5%	5%	8.6
20	Tritium	19	42%	32%	16%	16%	5%	0%	0%	8.17

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Caravaggio	19	74%	63%	58%	53%	37%	26%	21%	11.93
2	Caldiero Terme	19	47%	37%	32%	21%	21%	16%	11%	9.33
3	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	58%	53%	42%	32%	26%	21%	21%	10.72
4	Castellanzese	19	37%	32%	21%	21%	11%	5%	5%	8.5
5	Club Milano	19	68%	58%	58%	47%	37%	11%	11%	11.22
6	Piacenza	19	37%	32%	16%	5%	5%	5%	5%	8.31
7	Arconatese	19	47%	47%	32%	32%	21%	21%	5%	9.14
8	Villa Valle	19	58%	47%	42%	21%	5%	5%	5%	9.54
9	Real Calepina	19	42%	32%	26%	26%	26%	16%	16%	9.67
10	Clivense	19	63%	58%	37%	37%	26%	26%	11%	10.5
11	Pontisola	19	63%	47%	37%	32%	32%	21%	16%	10.26
12	Brusaporto	19	63%	63%	53%	37%	37%	21%	21%	11
13	Legnano	19	42%	42%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5%	9.42
14	Folgore Caratese	19	53%	37%	37%	26%	11%	11%	11%	10.25
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	53%	47%	32%	26%	21%	5%	5%	9.5
16	Varesina	19	42%	32%	21%	16%	16%	0%	0%	8.46
17	Pro Palazzolo	19	42%	37%	16%	11%	11%	11%	11%	9.4
18	Crema	19	37%	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	9.55
19	Casatese	19	37%	37%	32%	21%	11%	0%	0%	9
20	Tritium	19	47%	37%	32%	26%	21%	11%	5%	9.22

Overall
Home
Away

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Piacenza	38	71%	58%	47%	34%	26%	18%	11%	5.63
2	Pontisola	38	50%	42%	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	4.21
3	Legnano	38	55%	37%	32%	26%	11%	5%	5%	4.42
4	Tritium	38	53%	32%	21%	11%	11%	0%	0%	3.77
5	Caravaggio	38	61%	45%	34%	29%	24%	13%	5%	5.24
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	47%	42%	32%	29%	16%	11%	8%	5.29
7	Folgore Caratese	38	55%	50%	26%	11%	11%	3%	3%	4.12
8	Castellanzese	38	61%	55%	42%	34%	24%	13%	8%	5.44
9	Arconatese	38	53%	39%	32%	21%	16%	8%	5%	4.3
10	Brusaporto	38	74%	63%	53%	34%	26%	16%	13%	5.47
11	Villa Valle	38	63%	55%	47%	29%	16%	3%	3%	5.15
12	Caldiero Terme	38	74%	66%	53%	42%	34%	21%	18%	6.13
13	Crema	38	29%	21%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3%	3.53
14	Varesina	38	58%	42%	29%	21%	11%	5%	5%	4.41
15	Desenzano Calvina	38	66%	50%	39%	21%	13%	5%	3%	4.43
16	Casatese	38	45%	39%	34%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5.5
17	Real Calepina	38	37%	32%	21%	13%	11%	5%	0%	4.1
18	Clivense	38	74%	58%	53%	37%	16%	11%	8%	5.32
19	Club Milano	38	53%	45%	39%	32%	18%	8%	3%	4.74
20	Pro Palazzolo	38	58%	53%	34%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5.79

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Piacenza	19	89%	74%	74%	53%	47%	32%	21%	6.88
2	Pontisola	19	53%	47%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5%	4.5
3	Legnano	19	63%	53%	42%	32%	16%	11%	11%	5
4	Tritium	19	42%	37%	32%	16%	16%	0%	0%	4.17
5	Caravaggio	19	47%	37%	37%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5.64
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	32%	26%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5%	5.14
7	Folgore Caratese	19	63%	53%	26%	11%	11%	5%	5%	4.29
8	Castellanzese	19	68%	63%	53%	42%	37%	16%	11%	6
9	Arconatese	19	58%	47%	37%	26%	21%	11%	11%	5.15
10	Brusaporto	19	79%	63%	58%	37%	21%	16%	11%	5.11
11	Villa Valle	19	63%	58%	58%	37%	21%	5%	5%	5.62
12	Caldiero Terme	19	79%	79%	63%	53%	47%	37%	32%	7.25
13	Crema	19	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.5
14	Varesina	19	68%	53%	37%	26%	11%	5%	5%	5
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	74%	53%	47%	32%	21%	11%	5%	4.88
16	Casatese	19	47%	47%	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5.9
17	Real Calepina	19	32%	26%	21%	11%	5%	5%	0%	4.38
18	Clivense	19	79%	63%	58%	37%	16%	11%	5%	5.12
19	Club Milano	19	37%	32%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.46
20	Pro Palazzolo	19	68%	63%	37%	37%	32%	26%	16%	5.93

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Piacenza	19	53%	42%	21%	16%	5%	5%	0%	4
2	Pontisola	19	47%	37%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5%	3.93
3	Legnano	19	47%	21%	21%	21%	5%	0%	0%	3.75
4	Tritium	19	63%	26%	11%	5%	5%	0%	0%	3.43
5	Caravaggio	19	74%	53%	32%	26%	21%	11%	0%	4.93
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	63%	58%	37%	37%	26%	16%	11%	5.36
7	Folgore Caratese	19	47%	47%	26%	11%	11%	0%	0%	3.92
8	Castellanzese	19	53%	47%	32%	26%	11%	11%	5%	4.75
9	Arconatese	19	47%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5%	0%	3.5
10	Brusaporto	19	68%	63%	47%	32%	32%	16%	16%	5.93
11	Villa Valle	19	63%	53%	37%	21%	11%	0%	0%	4.69
12	Caldiero Terme	19	68%	53%	42%	32%	21%	5%	5%	4.93
13	Crema	19	37%	32%	5%	5%	5%	5%	5%	3.55
14	Varesina	19	47%	32%	21%	16%	11%	5%	5%	3.77
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	58%	47%	32%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.93
16	Casatese	19	42%	32%	32%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5.1
17	Real Calepina	19	42%	37%	21%	16%	16%	5%	0%	3.92
18	Clivense	19	68%	53%	47%	37%	16%	11%	11%	5.57
19	Club Milano	19	68%	58%	58%	53%	32%	16%	5%	5.93
20	Pro Palazzolo	19	47%	42%	32%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5.6

Overall
Home
Away

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Piacenza	38	63%	50%	34%	21%	16%	8%	5%	4.47
2	Pontisola	38	68%	58%	45%	37%	24%	11%	8%	5.52
3	Legnano	38	55%	47%	34%	26%	16%	13%	8%	5.04
4	Tritium	38	47%	47%	34%	26%	16%	13%	13%	4.96
5	Caravaggio	38	63%	55%	47%	39%	37%	21%	16%	6.48
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	38	53%	42%	32%	21%	18%	8%	8%	5.38
7	Folgore Caratese	38	63%	50%	37%	26%	18%	8%	5%	5.08
8	Castellanzese	38	55%	47%	37%	26%	24%	16%	5%	4.85
9	Arconatese	38	66%	63%	47%	29%	18%	13%	13%	5.74
10	Brusaporto	38	63%	47%	39%	26%	13%	5%	5%	4.22
11	Villa Valle	38	58%	50%	42%	34%	13%	0%	0%	4.85
12	Caldiero Terme	38	71%	53%	42%	29%	21%	8%	3%	4.65
13	Crema	38	37%	29%	26%	16%	11%	5%	5%	5.4
14	Varesina	38	50%	45%	32%	29%	13%	11%	8%	4.67
15	Desenzano Calvina	38	63%	53%	34%	26%	18%	13%	8%	4.73
16	Casatese	38	34%	24%	13%	5%	5%	3%	0%	3.3
17	Real Calepina	38	42%	37%	26%	24%	21%	16%	11%	5.8
18	Clivense	38	68%	50%	39%	24%	16%	5%	0%	4.42
19	Club Milano	38	68%	55%	47%	34%	21%	8%	5%	5.37
20	Pro Palazzolo	38	45%	21%	13%	5%	3%	0%	0%	3.29

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Piacenza	19	68%	47%	47%	32%	21%	11%	5%	4.59
2	Pontisola	19	63%	53%	37%	26%	16%	5%	0%	4.64
3	Legnano	19	58%	47%	32%	26%	16%	11%	5%	4.5
4	Tritium	19	32%	32%	16%	16%	11%	11%	11%	4
5	Caravaggio	19	58%	42%	32%	26%	26%	11%	11%	5.82
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	37%	26%	21%	16%	16%	5%	5%	5.43
7	Folgore Caratese	19	63%	37%	26%	21%	5%	0%	0%	4
8	Castellanzese	19	74%	68%	58%	42%	37%	21%	5%	5.73
9	Arconatese	19	68%	68%	42%	32%	21%	11%	11%	5.85
10	Brusaporto	19	63%	42%	32%	26%	5%	5%	5%	3.56
11	Villa Valle	19	58%	47%	37%	37%	16%	0%	0%	4.85
12	Caldiero Terme	19	79%	68%	47%	32%	21%	5%	0%	4.88
13	Crema	19	16%	16%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	3.75
14	Varesina	19	53%	42%	26%	26%	16%	11%	11%	4.64
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	68%	58%	26%	16%	5%	5%	0%	4
16	Casatese	19	32%	21%	11%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.7
17	Real Calepina	19	26%	26%	21%	21%	21%	16%	11%	5.88
18	Clivense	19	68%	47%	37%	16%	16%	5%	0%	4
19	Club Milano	19	68%	53%	42%	37%	26%	5%	5%	5.46
20	Pro Palazzolo	19	53%	21%	5%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.93

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
1	Piacenza	19	58%	53%	21%	11%	11%	5%	5%	4.31
2	Pontisola	19	74%	63%	53%	47%	32%	16%	16%	6.33
3	Legnano	19	53%	47%	37%	26%	16%	16%	11%	5.67
4	Tritium	19	63%	63%	53%	37%	21%	16%	16%	5.79
5	Caravaggio	19	68%	68%	63%	53%	47%	32%	21%	7
6	Virtus Ciserano Bergamo	19	68%	58%	42%	26%	21%	11%	11%	5.36
7	Folgore Caratese	19	63%	63%	47%	32%	32%	16%	11%	6.33
8	Castellanzese	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	11%	5%	3.75
9	Arconatese	19	63%	58%	53%	26%	16%	16%	16%	5.64
10	Brusaporto	19	63%	53%	47%	26%	21%	5%	5%	5.07
11	Villa Valle	19	58%	53%	47%	32%	11%	0%	0%	4.85
12	Caldiero Terme	19	63%	37%	37%	26%	21%	11%	5%	4.4
13	Crema	19	58%	42%	42%	32%	21%	11%	11%	6
14	Varesina	19	47%	47%	37%	32%	11%	11%	5%	4.69
15	Desenzano Calvina	19	58%	47%	42%	37%	32%	21%	16%	5.57
16	Casatese	19	37%	26%	16%	11%	11%	5%	0%	3.9
17	Real Calepina	19	58%	47%	32%	26%	21%	16%	11%	5.75
18	Clivense	19	68%	53%	42%	32%	16%	5%	0%	4.93
19	Club Milano	19	68%	58%	53%	32%	16%	11%	5%	5.29
20	Pro Palazzolo	19	37%	21%	21%	11%	5%	0%	0%	3.8

Tritium corner statistics

The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.

Here are the Tritium’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Serie D Group B:

Tritium games have an average of 8.73 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
24% of Tritium’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
Tritium has an average of 3.77 corners won per game this season.
On 11% of occasions, Tritium had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
Regarding corners given up, Tritium usually concedes an average of 4.96 corners per match.

You can also check out Tritium’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.

And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.