# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 14 | 9 | 6 | 35 | 22 | +13 | 51 | 1.76 |
2 | Penn FC | 27 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 30 | 29 | +1 | 41 | 1.52 |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 9 | 7 | 11 | 22 | 24 | 0 | 34 | 1.26 |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 13 | 10 | 5 | 29 | 16 | +13 | 49 | 1.75 |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 34 | 13 | +21 | 55 | 1.96 |
6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 13 | 4 | 10 | 32 | 23 | +9 | 43 | 1.59 |
7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 28 | 0 | 31 | 1.19 |
8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 22 | 23 | 0 | 29 | 1.12 |
9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 13 | 7 | 9 | 27 | 21 | +6 | 46 | 1.59 |
10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 25 | 24 | +1 | 36 | 1.33 |
11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 7 | 48 | 0 | 6 | 0.23 |
12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 3 | 14 | 9 | 10 | 21 | 0 | 23 | 0.88 |
13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 8 | 6 | 12 | 20 | 24 | 0 | 30 | 1.15 |
14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 1.67 |
15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 11 | 17 | 0 | 13 | 1.08 |
16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 19 | 1.36 |
17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 19 | 1.36 |
18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 18 | 1.64 |
19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 14 | 1.17 |
20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 0 | 17 | 1.31 |
21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 16 | 0 | 17 | 1.31 |
22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 7 | +4 | 15 | 1.5 |
23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 21 | 1.5 |
25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 13 | 1.3 |
26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 1.33 |
27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 19 | 10 | +9 | 25 | 1.79 |
28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 11 | 1.38 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 17 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 25 | 15 | +10 | 32 | 1.88 |
2 | Penn FC | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 22 | 1.47 |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 19 | 1.36 |
4 | Charleston Battery | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 9 | +13 | 31 | 2.07 |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 17 | 6 | +11 | 30 | 1.88 |
6 | Orange County SC | 14 | 8 | 1 | 5 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 25 | 1.79 |
7 | Rochester Rhinos | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 22 | 1.57 |
8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 18 | 1.29 |
9 | Charlotte Eagles | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 29 | 2.07 |
10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 21 | 1.5 |
11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
12 | Phoenix FC | 14 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 13 | 0.93 |
13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 14 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 22 | 1.57 |
14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 15 | 2.14 |
15 | Chivas USA Res. | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 1 |
16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.86 |
17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 12 | 1.71 |
18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 10 | 2 |
19 | New York RB Res. | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 1.17 |
20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 15 | 2.14 |
21 | Dallas Res. | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 2 | +4 | 8 | 1.6 |
23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 0 | 8 | 1.14 |
25 | Whitecaps Res. | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 7 | 1.4 |
26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 12 | 1.71 |
28 | Toronto Res. | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 5 | 1.67 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 19 | 1.58 |
2 | Penn FC | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 11 | 12 | 0 | 19 | 1.58 |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 0 | 15 | 1.15 |
4 | Charleston Battery | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 18 | 1.38 |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 7 | +10 | 25 | 2.08 |
6 | Orange County SC | 13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 15 | 14 | +1 | 18 | 1.38 |
7 | Rochester Rhinos | 12 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 9 | 0.75 |
8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 0.92 |
9 | Charlotte Eagles | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 15 | 17 | 0 | 17 | 1.13 |
10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 15 | 1.15 |
11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 7 | 48 | 0 | 6 | 0.23 |
12 | Phoenix FC | 12 | 1 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.83 |
13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 12 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 8 | 0.67 |
14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
15 | Chivas USA Res. | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 1.17 |
16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 13 | 1.86 |
17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 1.33 |
19 | New York RB Res. | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 7 | 1.17 |
20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0.33 |
21 | Dallas Res. | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 1.29 |
22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 1.4 |
23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 4 | +3 | 13 | 1.86 |
25 | Whitecaps Res. | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 6 | 1.2 |
26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1.33 |
27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 13 | 1.86 |
28 | Toronto Res. | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 6 | 1.2 |
The second half of football matches is crucial; it is when most matches are ultimately decided. That is why analysing a team’s performance exclusively in the second half of the match can be useful for evaluating different factors like tactical adaptation, players’ physical conditioning, the effectiveness of a coach’s substitutions or tactical changes, and the team’s overall mentality.
If we take only the second half statistics of Toronto Res.’s games in USL Championship 2013 into account, we can see that:
Studying statistics exclusively from the second half can help determine if a team can capably perform during what is often the pressure-filled portion of the match, or if they consistently falter under the pressure
So visit this page all season long if you’d like to see the Toronto Res. second half numbers in home games, away games, and overall, during the USL Championship 2013.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.