# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 31% | 21% | 10% |
2 | Penn FC | 27 | 33% | 22% | 11% |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 19% | 11% | 7% |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 36% | 18% | 11% |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 18% | 7% | 4% |
6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 44% | 22% | 7% |
7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 38% | 19% | 15% |
8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 38% | 27% | 15% |
9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 14% | 14% | 3% |
10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 37% | 15% | 7% |
11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 19% | 19% | 8% |
12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 46% | 38% | 19% |
13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 42% | 27% | 4% |
14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 25% | 17% | 0% |
16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 29% | 21% | 0% |
17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 14% |
18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 9% | 9% | 9% |
19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 38% | 23% | 8% |
21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 15% | 8% | 8% |
22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 40% | 20% | 0% |
24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 43% | 14% | 7% |
25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 10% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 11% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 36% | 21% | 7% |
28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 21% | 3% | 0% |
2 | Penn FC | 27 | 26% | 7% | 7% |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 33% | 11% | 4% |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 54% | 14% | 7% |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 21% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 56% | 30% | 7% |
7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 42% | 23% | 12% |
8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 58% | 27% | 23% |
9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 24% | 7% | 3% |
10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 48% | 22% | 4% |
11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 42% | 15% | 15% |
12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 58% | 38% | 8% |
13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 38% | 19% | 4% |
14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 50% | 33% | 8% |
16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 29% | 7% | 0% |
17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 21% |
18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 36% | 9% | 0% |
19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 17% | 8% | 8% |
20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 54% | 31% | 31% |
21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 23% | 8% | 0% |
22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 43% | 7% | 7% |
25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 40% | 10% | 0% |
26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 33% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 50% | 21% | 0% |
28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 38% | 38% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orlando City | 29 | 62% | 34% | 21% |
2 | Penn FC | 27 | 41% | 26% | 15% |
3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 41% | 19% | 4% |
4 | Charleston Battery | 28 | 43% | 18% | 4% |
5 | Richmond Kickers | 28 | 43% | 14% | 4% |
6 | Orange County SC | 27 | 41% | 15% | 4% |
7 | Rochester Rhinos | 26 | 38% | 19% | 4% |
8 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 26 | 31% | 12% | 8% |
9 | Charlotte Eagles | 29 | 31% | 10% | 7% |
10 | Dayton Dutch Lions | 27 | 41% | 11% | 0% |
11 | Antigua Barracuda F.C. | 26 | 19% | 12% | 4% |
12 | Phoenix FC | 26 | 62% | 23% | 12% |
13 | VSI Tampa Bay | 26 | 54% | 15% | 8% |
14 | Seattle Sounders Res. | 12 | 8% | 8% | 0% |
15 | Chivas USA Res. | 12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
16 | Colorado Rapids Res. | 14 | 36% | 21% | 14% |
17 | Real Salt Lake Res. | 14 | 36% | 7% | 7% |
18 | Montreal Impact Res. | 11 | 27% | 18% | 0% |
19 | New York RB Res. | 12 | 17% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Chicago Fire Res. | 13 | 31% | 15% | 0% |
21 | Dallas Res. | 13 | 31% | 15% | 15% |
22 | SJ Earthquakes Res. | 10 | 30% | 0% | 0% |
23 | LA Galaxy Res. | 10 | 60% | 30% | 20% |
24 | Portland Timbers Res. | 14 | 36% | 14% | 7% |
25 | Whitecaps Res. | 10 | 40% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Houston Dynamo Res. | 9 | 44% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Columbus Crew Res. | 14 | 43% | 29% | 14% |
28 | Toronto Res. | 8 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Toronto Res.’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 38% of their games played so far in the USL Championship 2013.
And on the other side of the ball, Toronto Res.’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 25% of their USL Championship matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Toronto Res. this season in the USL Championship:
You can follow the Toronto Res.’s card situation in USL Championship all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.