Season
Country
Venue
2026
China
Tianjin Olympic Center Stadium
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
21 | 100% | 81% | 67% | 52% | 52% | 29% | 29% | 11.43 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
20 | 80% | 75% | 65% | 60% | 55% | 45% | 30% | 11.35 |
| 3 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
20 | 85% | 65% | 55% | 45% | 40% | 30% | 25% | 10.65 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
20 | 80% | 75% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 25% | 15% | 10.6 |
| 5 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
21 | 76% | 62% | 48% | 48% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 10.53 |
| 6 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
20 | 90% | 70% | 45% | 30% | 30% | 25% | 20% | 10.4 |
| 7 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
20 | 70% | 60% | 55% | 45% | 35% | 25% | 20% | 10.25 |
| 8 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
21 | 81% | 67% | 52% | 43% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 10.19 |
| 9 |
Tianjin Teda
|
20 | 70% | 55% | 30% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 10 |
| 10 |
Hangzhou
|
21 | 71% | 62% | 48% | 38% | 38% | 24% | 19% | 10 |
| 11 |
Shandong Luneng
|
21 | 81% | 71% | 48% | 43% | 33% | 14% | 10% | 9.96 |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye
|
20 | 75% | 50% | 35% | 30% | 30% | 25% | 15% | 9.8 |
| 13 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
21 | 76% | 52% | 43% | 29% | 29% | 24% | 14% | 9.71 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
21 | 76% | 57% | 43% | 33% | 29% | 19% | 14% | 9.62 |
| 15 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
21 | 67% | 57% | 48% | 38% | 33% | 19% | 10% | 9.24 |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban
|
20 | 80% | 55% | 40% | 25% | 25% | 15% | 5% | 9.15 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 67% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 33% | 11.67 |
| 2 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 11.5 |
| 3 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 11.3 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 10.9 |
| 5 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
11 | 100% | 82% | 64% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 10.63 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 10.37 |
| 7 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 10.36 |
| 8 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
10 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 9.9 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 9.8 |
| 11 |
Shandong Luneng
|
10 | 80% | 70% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 9.7 |
| 12 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 9.7 |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 9.6 |
| 14 |
Shenyang Urban
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9.27 |
| 15 |
Tianjin Teda
|
10 | 70% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 9.2 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
11 | 73% | 55% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9.18 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 70% | 40% | 40% | 12.3 |
| 2 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 11.4 |
| 3 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 11.3 |
| 4 |
Beijing Guoan
|
9 | 78% | 78% | 67% | 56% | 56% | 33% | 22% | 10.89 |
| 5 |
Tianjin Teda
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 10.8 |
| 6 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 64% | 45% | 27% | 27% | 18% | 10.73 |
| 7 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10.7 |
| 8 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 10.18 |
| 9 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10.1 |
| 10 |
Henan Jianye
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 9.7 |
| 11 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 45% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9.63 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 9% | 9.37 |
| 13 |
Hangzhou
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 45% | 18% | 9% | 9.18 |
| 14 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 9 |
| 15 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 89% | 56% | 33% | 11% | 11% | 0% | 0% | 9 |
| 16 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 8.82 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
21 | 95% | 95% | 67% | 52% | 43% | 38% | 33% | 6.86 |
| 3 |
Beijing Guoan
|
20 | 85% | 80% | 60% | 60% | 55% | 40% | 25% | 6.55 |
| 4 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
20 | 90% | 85% | 75% | 70% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 6.1 |
| 5 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
20 | 90% | 70% | 55% | 50% | 45% | 30% | 30% | 5.9 |
| 6 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
20 | 85% | 75% | 60% | 40% | 30% | 25% | 20% | 5.7 |
| 7 |
Hangzhou
|
21 | 81% | 71% | 67% | 43% | 33% | 24% | 19% | 5.33 |
| 8 |
Henan Jianye
|
20 | 80% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 25% | 20% | 20% | 5.25 |
| 9 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
21 | 90% | 81% | 52% | 33% | 29% | 24% | 10% | 5.1 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
21 | 90% | 67% | 52% | 33% | 14% | 14% | 10% | 4.95 |
| 11 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
20 | 85% | 65% | 55% | 35% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 4.7 |
| 12 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
21 | 81% | 43% | 38% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 5% | 4.38 |
| 13 |
Shandong Luneng
|
21 | 86% | 62% | 43% | 29% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 4.29 |
| 14 |
Tianjin Teda
|
20 | 75% | 40% | 30% | 25% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.25 |
| 15 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
21 | 67% | 57% | 38% | 29% | 24% | 14% | 5% | 4.19 |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban
|
20 | 80% | 65% | 30% | 25% | 20% | 5% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 17 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
21 | 67% | 52% | 24% | 24% | 10% | 5% | 5% | 3.86 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 40% | 40% | 7.3 |
| 3 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
11 | 91% | 91% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 7.09 |
| 4 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 70% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 6.8 |
| 5 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 6.73 |
| 6 |
Hangzhou
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 6.6 |
| 7 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 6.6 |
| 8 |
Henan Jianye
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 6.3 |
| 9 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 78% | 44% | 22% | 11% | 11% | 5.78 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 70% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 5.5 |
| 11 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
11 | 91% | 82% | 55% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 9% | 5.36 |
| 12 |
Shandong Luneng
|
10 | 90% | 70% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.8 |
| 13 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.7 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
10 | 70% | 70% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 15 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
11 | 82% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 16 |
Shenyang Urban
|
11 | 82% | 64% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 3.91 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Teda
|
10 | 70% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 3.8 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
10 | 100% | 100% | 70% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 6.6 |
| 3 |
Beijing Guoan
|
9 | 89% | 78% | 67% | 67% | 67% | 44% | 22% | 6.33 |
| 4 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 90% | 90% | 70% | 60% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 5.6 |
| 5 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.8 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
10 | 80% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.7 |
| 7 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.6 |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
10 | 80% | 40% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 4.6 |
| 9 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 80% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.5 |
| 10 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 4.45 |
| 11 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 78% | 67% | 33% | 33% | 33% | 11% | 0% | 4.33 |
| 12 |
Henan Jianye
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4.2 |
| 13 |
Hangzhou
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 55% | 27% | 27% | 9% | 0% | 4.18 |
| 14 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 4 |
| 15 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 82% | 55% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.82 |
| 16 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
11 | 73% | 45% | 36% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.82 |
| 17 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
11 | 64% | 45% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.09 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
21 | 90% | 76% | 71% | 62% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 6.33 |
| 3 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
21 | 76% | 71% | 62% | 52% | 48% | 43% | 24% | 6.33 |
| 4 |
Tianjin Teda
|
20 | 90% | 85% | 70% | 40% | 25% | 15% | 15% | 5.75 |
| 5 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
20 | 95% | 75% | 45% | 45% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 5.7 |
| 6 |
Shandong Luneng
|
21 | 90% | 76% | 57% | 43% | 24% | 24% | 14% | 5.67 |
| 7 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
20 | 90% | 85% | 55% | 40% | 25% | 20% | 15% | 5.45 |
| 8 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
21 | 90% | 71% | 62% | 43% | 29% | 10% | 10% | 5.24 |
| 9 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
21 | 90% | 76% | 52% | 38% | 24% | 14% | 14% | 5.05 |
| 10 |
Shenyang Urban
|
20 | 70% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 30% | 30% | 30% | 5.05 |
| 11 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
21 | 76% | 67% | 43% | 33% | 24% | 14% | 5% | 4.76 |
| 12 |
Hangzhou
|
21 | 81% | 71% | 48% | 43% | 29% | 5% | 5% | 4.67 |
| 13 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
20 | 80% | 60% | 45% | 45% | 20% | 10% | 5% | 4.55 |
| 14 |
Henan Jianye
|
20 | 85% | 60% | 35% | 30% | 15% | 15% | 10% | 4.55 |
| 15 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
20 | 75% | 60% | 45% | 35% | 25% | 10% | 5% | 4.55 |
| 16 |
Beijing Guoan
|
20 | 75% | 55% | 35% | 15% | 15% | 15% | 10% | 4.05 |
| 17 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
21 | 71% | 33% | 24% | 14% | 14% | 10% | 5% | 3.67 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
9 | 100% | 89% | 44% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 5.89 |
| 3 |
Tianjin Teda
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 70% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 20% | 5.4 |
| 4 |
Shenyang Urban
|
11 | 64% | 55% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 36% | 5.36 |
| 5 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 10% | 5.3 |
| 6 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
11 | 91% | 73% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 18% | 9% | 5.27 |
| 7 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 9% | 9% | 5 |
| 8 |
Shandong Luneng
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 4.9 |
| 9 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
10 | 60% | 50% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 10% | 4.9 |
| 10 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 90% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.7 |
| 11 |
Hangzhou
|
10 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.3 |
| 12 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 4.3 |
| 13 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 80% | 80% | 30% | 10% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 |
Beijing Guoan
|
11 | 55% | 45% | 27% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9% | 3.64 |
| 15 |
Henan Jianye
|
10 | 80% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.6 |
| 16 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 50% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 17 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
11 | 73% | 27% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 9% | 0% | 3.27 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 |
Chongqing Tongliang Long
|
11 | 91% | 91% | 73% | 64% | 64% | 55% | 36% | 7.64 |
| 3 |
Sichuan Jiuniu
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 7.5 |
| 4 |
Shanghai Shenhua
|
10 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 6.9 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng
|
11 | 100% | 91% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 36% | 18% | 6.36 |
| 6 |
Tianjin Teda
|
10 | 90% | 90% | 70% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 6.1 |
| 7 |
Dalian Zhixing
|
10 | 100% | 80% | 50% | 50% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 5.7 |
| 8 |
Wuhan Three Towns
|
11 | 91% | 64% | 45% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 5.55 |
| 9 |
Henan Jianye
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 40% | 40% | 30% | 30% | 20% | 5.5 |
| 10 |
Qingdao Youth Island
|
10 | 90% | 80% | 70% | 40% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 5.5 |
| 11 |
Yunnan Yukun
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 36% | 36% | 27% | 18% | 9% | 5.18 |
| 12 |
Hangzhou
|
11 | 82% | 82% | 55% | 45% | 36% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 13 |
Qingdao Jonoon
|
11 | 82% | 73% | 45% | 36% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 4.82 |
| 14 |
Shenyang Urban
|
9 | 78% | 56% | 44% | 44% | 22% | 22% | 22% | 4.67 |
| 15 |
Beijing Guoan
|
9 | 100% | 67% | 44% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 11% | 4.56 |
| 16 |
Shanghai SIPG
|
10 | 70% | 60% | 50% | 50% | 20% | 10% | 0% | 4.4 |
| 17 |
Chengdu Better City FC
|
10 | 70% | 40% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 4.1 |
On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Tianjin Teda across the 2026 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.
At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.
As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Tianjin Teda provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.
Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Tianjin Teda, based on the most up-to-date data from the Chinese Super League:
Matches involving Tianjin Teda average 10 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
30% of matches featuring Tianjin Teda in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Tianjin Teda records 4.25 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 25% of games, Tianjin Teda registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Tianjin Teda concedes an average of 5.75 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.
This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Tianjin Teda in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.
Beyond presenting all corner averages for Tianjin Teda, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.
You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.
Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.
According to the data, Tianjin Teda averages 4.25 corners in their favor per match.
In the Chinese Super League, matches involving Tianjin Teda average 10 total corners per game.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.