Season
2022
Country
Brazil
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
2 | Aimoré | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Bahia de Feira | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Afogados | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Humaitá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | CEOV Operário | 16 | 13% | 13% | 6% |
7 | Castanhal | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Retrô | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | CSE | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Amazonas | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 | Juventude MA | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | São Paulo Crystal | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Azuriz | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
14 | Pérolas Negras | 14 | 21% | 21% | 21% |
15 | Acao Cuiaba | 14 | 21% | 21% | 7% |
16 | Fluminense PI | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Nova Venécia | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Caldense | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
19 | Globo | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Rio Branco | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
21 | Portuguesa RJ | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
22 | Ceilândia | 14 | 14% | 7% | 7% |
23 | Porto Velho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Costa Rica | 16 | 19% | 13% | 6% |
25 | Crato | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Pacajus | 16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
27 | Pouso Alegre | 24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | São Raimundo RR | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Anápolis | 16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
31 | Trem | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Sousa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | URT | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | América RN | 24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | ASA | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
37 | Moto Club MA | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Caxias | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
39 | Brasiliense | 16 | 25% | 6% | 6% |
40 | Ferroviária | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
41 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Noroeste | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Cianorte | 14 | 14% | 14% | 7% |
45 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | 4 de Julho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Cascavel FC | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Santa Cruz | 18 | 11% | 6% | 6% |
50 | Paraná | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Santa Cruz | 18 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
2 | Paraná | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
3 | Icasa | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | Oeste | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
5 | América RN | 24 | 4% | 0% | 0% |
6 | ASA | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
7 | Moto Club MA | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Caxias | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
9 | Brasiliense | 16 | 25% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Rio Branco | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
11 | Portuguesa RJ | 20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
12 | Ceilândia | 14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
13 | Caldense | 14 | 14% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Globo | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | São Raimundo RR | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Anápolis | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
18 | Trem | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Sousa | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | URT | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | São Bernardo | 22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
23 | Tocantinópolis | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Náutico RR | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 | Ferroviária | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
27 | Santo André | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 | Noroeste | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Cianorte | 14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
31 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | 4 de Julho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 | Nova Iguaçu | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Aimoré | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Bahia de Feira | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | Lagarto | 18 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
37 | São Luiz | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
38 | São Raimundo AM | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Tuna Luso | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
40 | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
41 | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
42 | Próspera Criciuma | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
43 | Juventus SC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
44 | Cascavel FC | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
45 | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
46 | Afogados | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | Humaitá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | CEOV Operário | 16 | 13% | 13% | 0% |
49 | Castanhal | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
50 | Porto Velho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ASA | 20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
2 | Sousa | 16 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
3 | URT | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 | São Bernardo | 22 | 5% | 0% | 0% |
5 | Tocantinópolis | 20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 | Náutico RR | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 | Jacuipense | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
8 | Sergipe | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 | São Raimundo RR | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 | Anápolis | 16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
11 | Trem | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 | Juazeirense | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 | Ferroviária | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
14 | Santo André | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
15 | Noroeste | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 | São Raimundo AM | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 | Tuna Luso | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 | Marcílio Dias | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
19 | Atlético Alagoinhas | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 | Próspera Criciuma | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 | Juventus SC | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 | Cascavel FC | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 | Grêmio Anápolis | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 | Porto Velho | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 | Costa Rica | 16 | 19% | 6% | 0% |
26 | Crato | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 | Pacajus | 16 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
28 | Retrô | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 | CSE | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 | Amazonas | 22 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 | Inter de Limeira | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 | Cianorte | 14 | 14% | 14% | 0% |
33 | Iporá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 | Afogados | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 | Humaitá | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
36 | CEOV Operário | 16 | 13% | 6% | 0% |
37 | Castanhal | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
38 | Moto Club MA | 18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
39 | Caxias | 20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
40 | Brasiliense | 16 | 25% | 6% | 6% |
41 | Rio Branco | 18 | 6% | 6% | 6% |
42 | Portuguesa RJ | 20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
43 | Ceilândia | 14 | 14% | 7% | 0% |
44 | Caldense | 14 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
45 | Globo | 14 | 7% | 0% | 0% |
46 | Juventude MA | 16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
47 | São Paulo Crystal | 14 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
48 | Pouso Alegre | 24 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
49 | Azuriz | 16 | 6% | 6% | 0% |
50 | Pérolas Negras | 14 | 21% | 14% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Juventude MA’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the Serie D 2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Juventude MA’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their Serie D matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Juventude MA this season in the Serie D:
You can follow the Juventude MA’s card situation in Serie D all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.