Season
2015/16
Country
Belgium
Stadium
Edmond Machtens-Stadion
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AS Eupen | 32 | 69% | 56% | 34% |
2 | Royal Antwerp FC | 32 | 69% | 50% | 13% |
3 | Cercle Brugge | 32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
4 | SV Roeselare | 32 | 59% | 41% | 28% |
5 | AFC Tubize | 32 | 66% | 53% | 28% |
6 | Lierse SK | 32 | 66% | 38% | 22% |
7 | Union Saint-Gilloise | 32 | 78% | 59% | 22% |
8 | Lommel United | 32 | 59% | 38% | 16% |
9 | ASV Geel | 32 | 53% | 31% | 22% |
10 | Patro Eisden | 32 | 69% | 47% | 31% |
11 | RFC Seraing | 32 | 84% | 69% | 34% |
12 | KSK Heist | 32 | 84% | 53% | 38% |
13 | KMSK Deinze | 32 | 63% | 38% | 31% |
14 | White Star Bruxelles | 32 | 81% | 59% | 47% |
15 | KVV Coxyde | 32 | 44% | 25% | 9% |
16 | Excelsior Virton | 32 | 66% | 47% | 38% |
17 | Dessel Sport | 32 | 66% | 50% | 28% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AS Eupen | 32 | 69% | 44% | 19% |
2 | Royal Antwerp FC | 32 | 56% | 31% | 3% |
3 | Cercle Brugge | 32 | 72% | 34% | 9% |
4 | SV Roeselare | 32 | 53% | 31% | 9% |
5 | AFC Tubize | 32 | 66% | 44% | 19% |
6 | Lierse SK | 32 | 44% | 28% | 9% |
7 | Union Saint-Gilloise | 32 | 69% | 38% | 13% |
8 | Lommel United | 32 | 59% | 22% | 13% |
9 | ASV Geel | 32 | 66% | 41% | 9% |
10 | Patro Eisden | 32 | 69% | 53% | 22% |
11 | RFC Seraing | 32 | 94% | 63% | 28% |
12 | KSK Heist | 32 | 81% | 50% | 31% |
13 | KMSK Deinze | 32 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
14 | White Star Bruxelles | 32 | 75% | 47% | 22% |
15 | KVV Coxyde | 32 | 50% | 34% | 16% |
16 | Excelsior Virton | 32 | 66% | 44% | 16% |
17 | Dessel Sport | 32 | 69% | 41% | 16% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | AS Eupen | 32 | 72% | 47% | 16% |
2 | Royal Antwerp FC | 32 | 88% | 47% | 13% |
3 | Cercle Brugge | 32 | 69% | 47% | 16% |
4 | SV Roeselare | 32 | 63% | 44% | 16% |
5 | AFC Tubize | 32 | 59% | 38% | 22% |
6 | Lierse SK | 32 | 81% | 50% | 25% |
7 | Union Saint-Gilloise | 32 | 78% | 53% | 34% |
8 | Lommel United | 32 | 66% | 31% | 16% |
9 | ASV Geel | 32 | 56% | 25% | 6% |
10 | Patro Eisden | 32 | 53% | 44% | 19% |
11 | RFC Seraing | 32 | 63% | 34% | 9% |
12 | KSK Heist | 32 | 69% | 34% | 3% |
13 | KMSK Deinze | 32 | 59% | 31% | 13% |
14 | White Star Bruxelles | 32 | 78% | 63% | 25% |
15 | KVV Coxyde | 32 | 47% | 13% | 3% |
16 | Excelsior Virton | 32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
17 | Dessel Sport | 32 | 63% | 47% | 22% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of White Star Bruxelles’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 47% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2015/2016.
And on the other side of the ball, White Star Bruxelles’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 78% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for White Star Bruxelles this season in the First Division B:
You can follow the White Star Bruxelles’s card situation in First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.