Season
Country
Stadium
2015/16
Belgium
Edmond Machtens-Stadion
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
AS Eupen |
32 | 69% | 56% | 34% |
| 2 |
Royal Antwerp FC |
32 | 69% | 50% | 13% |
| 3 |
Cercle Brugge |
32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
| 4 |
SV Roeselare |
32 | 59% | 41% | 28% |
| 5 |
AFC Tubize |
32 | 66% | 53% | 28% |
| 6 |
Lierse SK |
32 | 66% | 38% | 22% |
| 7 |
Union Saint-Gilloise |
32 | 78% | 59% | 22% |
| 8 |
Lommel United |
32 | 59% | 38% | 16% |
| 9 |
ASV Geel |
32 | 53% | 31% | 22% |
| 10 |
Patro Eisden |
32 | 69% | 47% | 31% |
| 11 |
RFC Seraing |
32 | 84% | 69% | 34% |
| 12 |
KSK Heist |
32 | 84% | 53% | 38% |
| 13 |
KMSK Deinze |
32 | 63% | 38% | 31% |
| 14 |
White Star Bruxelles |
32 | 81% | 59% | 47% |
| 15 |
KVV Coxyde |
32 | 44% | 25% | 9% |
| 16 |
Excelsior Virton |
32 | 66% | 47% | 38% |
| 17 |
Dessel Sport |
32 | 66% | 50% | 28% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
AS Eupen |
32 | 69% | 44% | 19% |
| 2 |
Royal Antwerp FC |
32 | 56% | 31% | 3% |
| 3 |
Cercle Brugge |
32 | 72% | 34% | 9% |
| 4 |
SV Roeselare |
32 | 53% | 31% | 9% |
| 5 |
AFC Tubize |
32 | 66% | 44% | 19% |
| 6 |
Lierse SK |
32 | 44% | 28% | 9% |
| 7 |
Union Saint-Gilloise |
32 | 69% | 38% | 13% |
| 8 |
Lommel United |
32 | 59% | 22% | 13% |
| 9 |
ASV Geel |
32 | 66% | 41% | 9% |
| 10 |
Patro Eisden |
32 | 69% | 53% | 22% |
| 11 |
RFC Seraing |
32 | 94% | 63% | 28% |
| 12 |
KSK Heist |
32 | 81% | 50% | 31% |
| 13 |
KMSK Deinze |
32 | 75% | 50% | 25% |
| 14 |
White Star Bruxelles |
32 | 75% | 47% | 22% |
| 15 |
KVV Coxyde |
32 | 50% | 34% | 16% |
| 16 |
Excelsior Virton |
32 | 66% | 44% | 16% |
| 17 |
Dessel Sport |
32 | 69% | 41% | 16% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
AS Eupen |
32 | 72% | 47% | 16% |
| 2 |
Royal Antwerp FC |
32 | 88% | 47% | 13% |
| 3 |
Cercle Brugge |
32 | 69% | 47% | 16% |
| 4 |
SV Roeselare |
32 | 63% | 44% | 16% |
| 5 |
AFC Tubize |
32 | 59% | 38% | 22% |
| 6 |
Lierse SK |
32 | 81% | 50% | 25% |
| 7 |
Union Saint-Gilloise |
32 | 78% | 53% | 34% |
| 8 |
Lommel United |
32 | 66% | 31% | 16% |
| 9 |
ASV Geel |
32 | 56% | 25% | 6% |
| 10 |
Patro Eisden |
32 | 53% | 44% | 19% |
| 11 |
RFC Seraing |
32 | 63% | 34% | 9% |
| 12 |
KSK Heist |
32 | 69% | 34% | 3% |
| 13 |
KMSK Deinze |
32 | 59% | 31% | 13% |
| 14 |
White Star Bruxelles |
32 | 78% | 63% | 25% |
| 15 |
KVV Coxyde |
32 | 47% | 13% | 3% |
| 16 |
Excelsior Virton |
32 | 69% | 47% | 22% |
| 17 |
Dessel Sport |
32 | 63% | 47% | 22% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of White Star Bruxelles’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 47% of their games played so far in the First Division B 2015/2016.
And on the other side of the ball, White Star Bruxelles’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 78% of their First Division B matches.
Here are two more card statistics for White Star Bruxelles this season in the Challenger Pro League:
You can follow the White Star Bruxelles’s card situation in Belgian First Division B all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.