# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 5 | 8 | 15 | 15 | 27 | 0 | 23 | 0.82 |
2 | Toronto II | 28 | 7 | 15 | 6 | 20 | 16 | +4 | 36 | 1.29 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 10 | 8 | 11 | 21 | 22 | 0 | 38 | 1.31 |
4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 10 | 14 | 6 | 24 | 23 | +1 | 44 | 1.47 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 22 | 29 | 0 | 32 | 1.14 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 13 | 10 | 7 | 19 | 15 | +4 | 49 | 1.63 |
7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 8 | 11 | 9 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 35 | 1.25 |
8 | North Texas | 29 | 10 | 11 | 8 | 21 | 21 | 0 | 41 | 1.41 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 26 | 22 | +4 | 43 | 1.43 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 5 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 28 | 0 | 26 | 0.93 |
11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 27 | 14 | +13 | 51 | 1.7 |
12 | New England II | 28 | 10 | 7 | 11 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 37 | 1.32 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 15 | 1.07 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 4 | +7 | 24 | 1.71 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 24 | 1.71 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 25 | 1.67 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 0 | 16 | 1.14 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 25 | 1.67 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 17 | 1.21 |
8 | North Texas | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 24 | 1.71 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 16 | 11 | +5 | 24 | 1.6 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 12 | 0.86 |
11 | Union Omaha | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 26 | 1.63 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 21 | 1.5 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 16 | 0 | 8 | 0.57 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.86 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 14 | 0.93 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 0 | 19 | 1.27 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 14 | 17 | 0 | 16 | 1.14 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 24 | 1.6 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 18 | 1.29 |
8 | North Texas | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 0 | 17 | 1.13 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 19 | 1.27 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 14 | 1 |
11 | Union Omaha | 14 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 25 | 1.79 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 9 | 14 | 0 | 16 | 1.14 |
The second half of football matches is crucial; it is when most matches are ultimately decided. That is why analysing a team’s performance exclusively in the second half of the match can be useful for evaluating different factors like tactical adaptation, players’ physical conditioning, the effectiveness of a coach’s substitutions or tactical changes, and the team’s overall mentality.
If we take only the second half statistics of New England II’s games in USL League One 2021 into account, we can see that:
Studying statistics exclusively from the second half can help determine if a team can capably perform during what is often the pressure-filled portion of the match, or if they consistently falter under the pressure
So visit this page all season long if you’d like to see the New England II second half numbers in home games, away games, and overall, during the USL League One 2021.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.