# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 5 | 14 | 9 | 15 | 23 | -8 | 29 | 1.04 |
2 | Toronto II | 28 | 5 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 32 | 1.14 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 7 | 14 | 8 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 35 | 1.21 |
4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 22 | 25 | -3 | 37 | 1.23 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 6 | 13 | 9 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 31 | 1.11 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 8 | 15 | 7 | 19 | 17 | +2 | 39 | 1.3 |
7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 34 | 1.21 |
8 | North Texas | 29 | 10 | 13 | 6 | 20 | 13 | +7 | 43 | 1.48 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 8 | 15 | 7 | 13 | 10 | +3 | 39 | 1.3 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 21 | -1 | 34 | 1.21 |
11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 26 | 9 | +17 | 60 | 2 |
12 | New England II | 28 | 5 | 14 | 9 | 13 | 19 | -6 | 29 | 1.04 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 10 | 14 | -4 | 14 | 1 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 16 | 1.14 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 21 | 1.5 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 20 | 1.33 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 8 | +1 | 22 | 1.57 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 24 | 1.6 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 5 | +3 | 24 | 1.71 |
8 | North Texas | 14 | 5 | 8 | 1 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 23 | 1.64 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 22 | 1.47 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 21 | 1.5 |
11 | Union Omaha | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 5 | +12 | 36 | 2.25 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 20 | 1.43 |
# | Team | MP | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | PPG |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | North Carolina FC | 14 | 2 | 9 | 3 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 15 | 1.07 |
2 | Toronto II | 14 | 3 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 16 | 1.14 |
3 | Richmond Kickers | 15 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 14 | 0.93 |
4 | FC Tucson | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 17 | 1.13 |
5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 14 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 10 | -5 | 9 | 0.64 |
6 | Greenville Triumph | 15 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 15 | 1 |
7 | Forward Madison | 14 | 2 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 10 | 0.71 |
8 | North Texas | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 20 | 1.33 |
9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 15 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 17 | 1.13 |
10 | Inter Miami II | 14 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 13 | 0.93 |
11 | Union Omaha | 14 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 9 | 4 | +5 | 24 | 1.71 |
12 | New England II | 14 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 9 | 0.64 |
It can be quite helpful to take a closer look at a team’s performance only in the first half of football games. Whether it’s the tactics of the coach or the comparison of their performance with other teams, they provide a glimpse into their overall play.
So if we only look at the first half of the match, we can see how New England II has performed compared to other teams in the USL League One in terms of their initial tactics over the first 45 minutes.
Below are some deeper insights on how New England II has played in the 1st half of their games in USL League One 2021:
You can also check out New England II’s first half statistics for both home and away matches in the USL League One 2021.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.