Cards
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  North Carolina FC | 28 | 68% | 54% | 25% |
| 2 |  Toronto II | 28 | 75% | 68% | 25% |
| 3 |  Richmond Kickers | 29 | 79% | 66% | 48% |
| 4 |  FC Tucson | 30 | 73% | 63% | 47% |
| 5 |  South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 71% | 61% | 36% |
| 6 |  Greenville Triumph | 30 | 70% | 50% | 33% |
| 7 |  Forward Madison | 28 | 71% | 54% | 36% |
| 8 |  North Texas | 29 | 83% | 59% | 34% |
| 9 |  Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 87% | 77% | 47% |
| 10 |  Inter Miami II | 28 | 43% | 36% | 18% |
| 11 |  Union Omaha | 30 | 73% | 53% | 30% |
| 12 |  New England II | 28 | 64% | 46% | 21% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 71% | 50% | 18% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 61% | 36% | 4% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 86% | 59% | 38% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 80% | 60% | 27% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 79% | 43% | 29% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 70% | 37% | 13% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 75% | 39% | 14% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 72% | 45% | 34% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 83% | 57% | 30% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 68% | 36% | 11% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 73% | 23% | 10% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 68% | 39% | 21% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | North Carolina FC | 28 | 64% | 29% | 11% |
| 2 | Toronto II | 28 | 89% | 50% | 29% |
| 3 | Richmond Kickers | 29 | 79% | 48% | 21% |
| 4 | FC Tucson | 30 | 77% | 40% | 23% |
| 5 | South Georgia Tormenta FC | 28 | 71% | 43% | 21% |
| 6 | Greenville Triumph | 30 | 70% | 50% | 33% |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 28 | 75% | 50% | 18% |
| 8 | North Texas | 29 | 83% | 41% | 14% |
| 9 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 30 | 90% | 60% | 33% |
| 10 | Inter Miami II | 28 | 43% | 21% | 11% |
| 11 | Union Omaha | 30 | 73% | 53% | 23% |
| 12 | New England II | 28 | 71% | 36% | 11% |
New England II card statistics
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of New England II’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 39% of their games played so far in the USL League One 2021.
And on the other side of the ball, New England II’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 71% of their USL League One matches.
Here are two more card statistics for New England II this season in the USL League One:
- Overall, matches involving New England II have had 4 or more cards 64% of the time (those are cards given to both New England II and their opponents).
- In terms of Fair Play, New England II is in 11th place in the competition.
You can follow the New England II’s card situation in USL League One all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.