Season
2022
Country
China
Stadium
Yuexiushan Stadium
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dalian Yifang | 33 | 76% | 58% | 58% | 39% | 27% | 15% | 6% | 9.55 |
2 | Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 70% | 58% | 58% | 33% | 21% | 18% | 12% | 9.52 |
3 | Changchun Yatai | 33 | 76% | 64% | 52% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 9.3 |
4 | Hangzhou | 33 | 61% | 48% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 15% | 12% | 9.15 |
5 | Shandong Luneng | 33 | 70% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 9.07 |
6 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 67% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 21% | 12% | 6% | 9 |
7 | Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 67% | 55% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9 |
8 | Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 67% | 55% | 42% | 33% | 21% | 12% | 3% | 9 |
9 | Beijing Guoan | 33 | 64% | 48% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 8.97 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 61% | 48% | 39% | 30% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 8.94 |
11 | Henan Jianye | 33 | 61% | 48% | 42% | 24% | 15% | 15% | 12% | 8.87 |
12 | Wuhan Zall | 33 | 67% | 55% | 33% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 8.73 |
13 | Shenzhen | 33 | 67% | 45% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 3% | 8.69 |
14 | Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 55% | 52% | 42% | 27% | 12% | 9% | 6% | 8.57 |
15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 55% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 8.37 |
16 | Hebei CFFC | 33 | 67% | 39% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 8.31 |
17 | Tianjin Teda | 33 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 15% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 7.84 |
18 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 45% | 36% | 30% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 7.73 |
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 76% | 53% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9.35 |
2 | Wuhan Three Towns | 16 | 75% | 69% | 69% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 9.76 |
3 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 76% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 8.65 |
4 | Hangzhou | 16 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 10.93 |
5 | Shandong Luneng | 16 | 69% | 50% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.6 |
6 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 76% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 9.7 |
7 | Shanghai SIPG | 16 | 69% | 44% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 7.69 |
8 | Chengdu Better City FC | 16 | 69% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 9.19 |
9 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 9.63 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 16 | 56% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 31% | 9.38 |
11 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 53% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.69 |
12 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 8.53 |
13 | Shenzhen | 17 | 71% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 8.48 |
14 | Meizhou Hakka | 16 | 50% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.44 |
15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 16 | 63% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 9.06 |
16 | Hebei CFFC | 16 | 63% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 8.47 |
17 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 53% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.18 |
18 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.18 |
# | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Dalian Yifang | 16 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 19% | 6% | 9.75 |
2 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 65% | 47% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 9.3 |
3 | Changchun Yatai | 16 | 75% | 75% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 10 |
4 | Hangzhou | 17 | 47% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 7.59 |
5 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 71% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 9.47 |
6 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 16 | 56% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 8.25 |
7 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 65% | 65% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 10.31 |
8 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 8.82 |
9 | Beijing Guoan | 16 | 63% | 44% | 38% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 8.31 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 65% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 8.5 |
11 | Henan Jianye | 16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 9.07 |
12 | Wuhan Zall | 16 | 75% | 56% | 31% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 8.94 |
13 | Shenzhen | 16 | 63% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 8.94 |
14 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 59% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 8.69 |
15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.71 |
16 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 71% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 8.18 |
17 | Tianjin Teda | 16 | 56% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 8.6 |
18 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 16 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.31 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 31 | 65% | 39% | 29% | 19% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.39 |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 31 | 65% | 26% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2.97 |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 31 | 84% | 74% | 55% | 42% | 35% | 29% | 13% | 5.5 |
4 | Henan Jianye | 31 | 81% | 74% | 58% | 29% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 4.84 |
5 | Hangzhou | 31 | 84% | 65% | 55% | 35% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.56 |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 31 | 87% | 74% | 58% | 45% | 42% | 26% | 10% | 5.44 |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 31 | 29% | 23% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.09 |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 31 | 74% | 68% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 4.36 |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 31 | 97% | 87% | 77% | 48% | 35% | 29% | 23% | 6.38 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 31 | 42% | 32% | 26% | 19% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 2.91 |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 31 | 71% | 58% | 45% | 29% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 3.79 |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 31 | 71% | 55% | 39% | 26% | 13% | 10% | 3% | 4 |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 31 | 103% | 81% | 71% | 48% | 32% | 26% | 16% | 5.58 |
14 | Shenzhen | 31 | 68% | 55% | 42% | 26% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 3.91 |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 31 | 84% | 52% | 35% | 16% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 3.7 |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 31 | 81% | 65% | 52% | 35% | 16% | 13% | 6% | 4.63 |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 31 | 90% | 77% | 52% | 35% | 32% | 29% | 23% | 5.64 |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 31 | 87% | 81% | 71% | 52% | 39% | 32% | 16% | 5.64 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 59% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 16 | 69% | 63% | 44% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 6% | 4.5 |
4 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 76% | 71% | 53% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.81 |
5 | Hangzhou | 16 | 81% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 13% | 5.2 |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 82% | 65% | 53% | 47% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6.13 |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 16 | 25% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 88% | 82% | 53% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.71 |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 16 | 88% | 75% | 69% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 5.93 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 16 | 44% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 3.38 |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 16 | 75% | 69% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 4.56 |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 59% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.59 |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 100% | 76% | 71% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 5.59 |
14 | Shenzhen | 17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.24 |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 71% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.35 |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 16 | 81% | 69% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.5 |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 16 | 88% | 81% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 6.13 |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 16 | 81% | 81% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 5.81 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 16 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 3.5 |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 16 | 63% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.25 |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 88% | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6.5 |
4 | Henan Jianye | 16 | 75% | 69% | 56% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 4.88 |
5 | Hangzhou | 17 | 76% | 65% | 47% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 16 | 81% | 75% | 56% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 0% | 4.75 |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 29% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 16 | 50% | 44% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 4 |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 94% | 88% | 76% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 6.76 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 35% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2.44 |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.06 |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 16 | 75% | 56% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 4.47 |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 16 | 94% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 5.56 |
14 | Shenzhen | 16 | 69% | 56% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.67 |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 16 | 88% | 56% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 4.06 |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.75 |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 82% | 65% | 41% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 5.18 |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 82% | 71% | 71% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 5.47 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 31 | 97% | 87% | 71% | 42% | 29% | 23% | 19% | 5.61 |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 31 | 81% | 71% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 19% | 13% | 4.76 |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 31 | 61% | 45% | 29% | 26% | 10% | 10% | 6% | 3.5 |
4 | Henan Jianye | 31 | 71% | 52% | 39% | 23% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 4.03 |
5 | Hangzhou | 31 | 68% | 58% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 16% | 10% | 4.59 |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 31 | 65% | 45% | 29% | 19% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 3.53 |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 31 | 90% | 87% | 81% | 68% | 52% | 23% | 10% | 6.22 |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 31 | 84% | 58% | 48% | 39% | 26% | 23% | 16% | 4.94 |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 31 | 58% | 29% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 31 | 84% | 77% | 68% | 52% | 39% | 29% | 19% | 6.03 |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 31 | 84% | 71% | 48% | 32% | 19% | 16% | 10% | 4.58 |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 31 | 87% | 48% | 26% | 19% | 16% | 6% | 0% | 3.84 |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 31 | 71% | 61% | 48% | 32% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 3.97 |
14 | Shenzhen | 31 | 90% | 77% | 52% | 29% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.78 |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 31 | 84% | 71% | 55% | 45% | 29% | 23% | 13% | 5.03 |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 31 | 68% | 48% | 39% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.94 |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 31 | 61% | 52% | 45% | 26% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.88 |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 31 | 58% | 45% | 42% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.36 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 94% | 88% | 71% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 6.41 |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 76% | 59% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.47 |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 16 | 56% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.19 |
4 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 59% | 29% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 3.88 |
5 | Hangzhou | 16 | 69% | 63% | 56% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 5.73 |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 3.5 |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 16 | 81% | 81% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 19% | 13% | 6.27 |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 71% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3.94 |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 16 | 56% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 16 | 75% | 69% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 6 |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 4.5 |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 82% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 3.59 |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 65% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.76 |
14 | Shenzhen | 17 | 100% | 76% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 5.24 |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 76% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 5.18 |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 16 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.94 |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 16 | 50% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.63 |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 16 | 56% | 50% | 44% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
# | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 16 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 4.75 |
2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 16 | 75% | 75% | 69% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 5.06 |
3 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.81 |
4 | Henan Jianye | 16 | 75% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.19 |
5 | Hangzhou | 17 | 59% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 3.59 |
6 | Beijing Guoan | 16 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.56 |
7 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 88% | 82% | 82% | 71% | 53% | 24% | 6% | 6.18 |
8 | Changchun Yatai | 16 | 88% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 6 |
9 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 53% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
10 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 82% | 76% | 65% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 6.06 |
11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 88% | 76% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 4.65 |
12 | Tianjin Teda | 16 | 81% | 56% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
13 | Dalian Yifang | 16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 4.19 |
14 | Shenzhen | 16 | 69% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.27 |
15 | Wuhan Zall | 16 | 81% | 69% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 13% | 6% | 4.88 |
16 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 53% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 3.94 |
17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.12 |
18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 53% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 3.35 |
The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.
Here are the Guangzhou’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Chinese Super League:
You can also check out Guangzhou’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.
And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.