Football statistics for Guangzhou R&F
Team Info
Season
2022
Country
China
Stadium
Yuexiushan Stadium
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Guangzhou Evergrande | 33 | 16 | 48% |
| 2 |  Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 33 | 16 | 48% |
| 3 |  Shanghai SIPG | 33 | 13 | 39% |
| 4 |  Henan Jianye | 33 | 16 | 48% |
| 5 |  Hangzhou | 33 | 16 | 48% |
| 6 |  Beijing Guoan | 33 | 20 | 61% |
| 7 |  Hebei CFFC | 33 | 13 | 39% |
| 8 |  Changchun Yatai | 33 | 18 | 55% |
| 9 |  Shandong Luneng | 33 | 15 | 45% |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 33 | 14 | 42% |
| 11 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 33 | 18 | 55% |
| 12 |  Tianjin Teda | 33 | 15 | 45% |
| 13 |  Dalian Yifang | 33 | 20 | 61% |
| 14 |  Shenzhen | 33 | 14 | 42% |
| 15 |  Wuhan Zall | 33 | 18 | 55% |
| 16 |  Meizhou Hakka | 33 | 14 | 42% |
| 17 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 33 | 17 | 52% |
| 18 |  Chengdu Better City FC | 33 | 15 | 45% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 17 | 7 | 41% |
| 3 | Shanghai SIPG | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 4 | Henan Jianye | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 5 | Hangzhou | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 7 | Hebei CFFC | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 9 | Shandong Luneng | 16 | 5 | 31% |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 12 | Tianjin Teda | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 17 | 12 | 71% |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 17 | 11 | 65% |
| 16 | Meizhou Hakka | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 16 | 9 | 56% |
| 18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 16 | 9 | 56% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou Evergrande | 16 | 6 | 38% |
| 2 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 16 | 9 | 56% |
| 3 | Shanghai SIPG | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 4 | Henan Jianye | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 5 | Hangzhou | 17 | 11 | 65% |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 16 | 11 | 69% |
| 7 | Hebei CFFC | 17 | 7 | 41% |
| 8 | Changchun Yatai | 16 | 10 | 63% |
| 9 | Shandong Luneng | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 10 | Guangzhou R&F | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 11 | Shanghai Shenhua | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 12 | Tianjin Teda | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 13 | Dalian Yifang | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 14 | Shenzhen | 16 | 8 | 50% |
| 15 | Wuhan Zall | 16 | 7 | 44% |
| 16 | Meizhou Hakka | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 17 | Wuhan Three Towns | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 18 | Chengdu Better City FC | 17 | 6 | 35% |
Guangzhou R&F BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Guangzhou’s case, their BTTS statistics in the Chinese Super League 2022 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Guangzhou R&F in the competition:
- In 33 matches to date, Guangzhou R&F has scored and conceded in the same game 14 times
- In terms of percentage, Guangzhou has had both teams score in 42% of their matches in Chinese Super League.
You can also see Guangzhou R&F’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.