Football statistics for Kyzyl-Zhar
Team Info
Season
Country
Stadium
2022/23
Europe
Stadion Karasay
Competition
Both Teams to Score
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shamrock Rovers |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 2 |
Apollon |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 3 |
Sheriff |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 4 |
Silkeborg |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 5 |
Ludogorets |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 6 |
Partizani Tirana |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
UE Santa Coloma |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 8 |
Atlètic Club d'Escaldes |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 9 |
Borac Banja Luka |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 10 |
İstanbul Başakşehir |
14 | 8 | 57% |
| 11 |
Molde |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 12 |
Breidablik |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 13 |
AIK |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 14 |
Qabala |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 15 |
Djurgården |
14 | 7 | 50% |
| 16 |
Makedonija GjP |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
CS U Craiova |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 18 |
Motherwell |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Hapoel Be'er Sheva |
12 | 7 | 58% |
| 20 |
The New Saints |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Neftçi |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 22 |
Maccabi Tel Aviv |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 23 |
Maccabi Netanya |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 24 |
Viborg |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 25 |
Botev Plovdiv |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
AZ |
18 | 8 | 44% |
| 27 |
Brøndby |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 28 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 29 |
Velež |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Víkingur Reykjavík |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 31 |
KÍ |
4 | 2 | 50% |
| 32 |
Videoton |
6 | 4 | 67% |
| 33 |
Kairat |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Trabzonspor |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Bodo/Glimt |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Elfsborg |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 37 |
Raków Częstochowa |
6 | 1 | 17% |
| 38 |
Gomel |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 39 |
AEK Larnaca |
4 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Racing Union |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 41 |
Aris |
4 | 3 | 75% |
| 42 |
Young Boys |
6 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
FCSB |
12 | 5 | 42% |
| 44 |
Lincoln Red Imps |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Liepāja |
4 | 1 | 25% |
| 46 |
B36 |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 47 |
Tallinna FC Flora |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 48 |
Dinamo Tbilisi |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 49 |
Alashkert |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 50 |
Dila |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shamrock Rovers |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 2 |
Apollon |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 3 |
Sheriff |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 4 |
Silkeborg |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 5 |
Ludogorets |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 6 |
Partizani Tirana |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
UE Santa Coloma |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 8 |
Atlètic Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 9 |
Borac Banja Luka |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 10 |
İstanbul Başakşehir |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 11 |
Molde |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 12 |
Breidablik |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 13 |
AIK |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 14 |
Qabala |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 15 |
Djurgården |
7 | 3 | 43% |
| 16 |
Makedonija GjP |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
CS U Craiova |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 18 |
Motherwell |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Hapoel Be'er Sheva |
6 | 5 | 83% |
| 20 |
The New Saints |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Neftçi |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 22 |
Maccabi Tel Aviv |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 23 |
Maccabi Netanya |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 24 |
Viborg |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 25 |
Botev Plovdiv |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
AZ |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 27 |
Brøndby |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 28 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 29 |
Velež |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Víkingur Reykjavík |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 31 |
KÍ |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 32 |
Videoton |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 33 |
Kairat |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Trabzonspor |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Bodo/Glimt |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Elfsborg |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 37 |
Raków Częstochowa |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 38 |
Gomel |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 39 |
AEK Larnaca |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Racing Union |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 41 |
Aris |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 42 |
Young Boys |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
FCSB |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 44 |
Lincoln Red Imps |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Liepāja |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 46 |
B36 |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 47 |
Tallinna FC Flora |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 48 |
Dinamo Tbilisi |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 49 |
Alashkert |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 50 |
Dila |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shamrock Rovers |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 |
Apollon |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 3 |
Sheriff |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 4 |
Silkeborg |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 5 |
Ludogorets |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 6 |
Partizani Tirana |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 7 |
UE Santa Coloma |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 8 |
Atlètic Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 9 |
Borac Banja Luka |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 10 |
İstanbul Başakşehir |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 11 |
Molde |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 12 |
Breidablik |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 13 |
AIK |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 14 |
Qabala |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 15 |
Djurgården |
7 | 4 | 57% |
| 16 |
Makedonija GjP |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 17 |
CS U Craiova |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 18 |
Motherwell |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 19 |
Hapoel Be'er Sheva |
6 | 2 | 33% |
| 20 |
The New Saints |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 21 |
Neftçi |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 22 |
Maccabi Tel Aviv |
3 | 1 | 33% |
| 23 |
Maccabi Netanya |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 24 |
Viborg |
3 | 2 | 67% |
| 25 |
Botev Plovdiv |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 26 |
AZ |
9 | 4 | 44% |
| 27 |
Brøndby |
2 | 2 | 100% |
| 28 |
Inter Club d'Escaldes |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 29 |
Velež |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 30 |
Víkingur Reykjavík |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 31 |
KÍ |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 32 |
Videoton |
3 | 3 | 100% |
| 33 |
Kairat |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 34 |
Trabzonspor |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 35 |
Bodo/Glimt |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 36 |
Elfsborg |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 37 |
Raków Częstochowa |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 38 |
Gomel |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 39 |
AEK Larnaca |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 40 |
Racing Union |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 41 |
Aris |
2 | 1 | 50% |
| 42 |
Young Boys |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 43 |
FCSB |
6 | 3 | 50% |
| 44 |
Lincoln Red Imps |
1 | 0 | 0% |
| 45 |
Liepāja |
2 | 0 | 0% |
| 46 |
B36 |
3 | 0 | 0% |
| 47 |
Tallinna FC Flora |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 48 |
Dinamo Tbilisi |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 49 |
Alashkert |
1 | 1 | 100% |
| 50 |
Dila |
1 | 0 | 0% |
Kyzyl-Zhar BTTS matches in the season
The both teams scoring stat is the number of times a team has both scored and conceded a goal in a match. This stat is helpful in determining whether a match has the potential to be a high-scoring affair.
And in Kyzyl-Zhar’s case, their BTTS statistics in the UEFA Europa Conference League 2022/2023 provide some interesting insights about their offence and defence. Here are the relevant BTTS stats on Kyzyl-Zhar in the competition:
- In 4 matches to date, Kyzyl-Zhar has scored and conceded in the same game 1 times
- In terms of percentage, Kyzyl-Zhar has had both teams score in 25% of their matches in UEFA Conference League.
You can also see Kyzyl-Zhar’s BTTS stats filtered in terms of where they play, whether it’s at home or away, as well as overall, for a more comprehensive view of the stat all season long.