# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orenburg | 34 | 62% | 41% | 32% |
2 | Krylya Sovetov | 34 | 47% | 21% | 15% |
3 | Tom' Tomsk | 34 | 41% | 32% | 21% |
4 | Anzhi Makhachkala | 34 | 62% | 38% | 24% |
5 | FK Volga Nizhny Novgorod | 34 | 47% | 38% | 29% |
6 | Tosno | 34 | 53% | 24% | 6% |
7 | SKA Khabarovsk | 34 | 74% | 50% | 35% |
8 | Shinnik | 34 | 53% | 38% | 21% |
9 | Yenisey | 34 | 47% | 26% | 18% |
10 | Sibir | 34 | 65% | 50% | 35% |
11 | Luch Vladivostok | 34 | 56% | 38% | 29% |
12 | Baltika | 34 | 50% | 35% | 18% |
13 | FK Sochi | 34 | 53% | 26% | 18% |
14 | Volgar Astrakhan | 34 | 56% | 26% | 21% |
15 | Tyumen | 34 | 59% | 35% | 18% |
16 | Sokol Saratov | 34 | 44% | 32% | 18% |
17 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 34 | 59% | 32% | 21% |
18 | Sakhalin | 34 | 32% | 26% | 18% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orenburg | 34 | 47% | 29% | 12% |
2 | Krylya Sovetov | 34 | 41% | 15% | 6% |
3 | Tom' Tomsk | 34 | 35% | 24% | 9% |
4 | Anzhi Makhachkala | 34 | 56% | 24% | 12% |
5 | FK Volga Nizhny Novgorod | 34 | 68% | 26% | 15% |
6 | Tosno | 34 | 68% | 24% | 6% |
7 | SKA Khabarovsk | 34 | 79% | 41% | 26% |
8 | Shinnik | 34 | 62% | 24% | 12% |
9 | Yenisey | 34 | 59% | 26% | 15% |
10 | Sibir | 34 | 71% | 47% | 26% |
11 | Luch Vladivostok | 34 | 71% | 47% | 21% |
12 | Baltika | 34 | 47% | 24% | 12% |
13 | FK Sochi | 34 | 65% | 38% | 18% |
14 | Volgar Astrakhan | 34 | 53% | 35% | 9% |
15 | Tyumen | 34 | 62% | 26% | 9% |
16 | Sokol Saratov | 34 | 53% | 29% | 9% |
17 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 34 | 56% | 32% | 12% |
18 | Sakhalin | 34 | 44% | 18% | 3% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Orenburg | 34 | 79% | 41% | 24% |
2 | Krylya Sovetov | 34 | 71% | 32% | 18% |
3 | Tom' Tomsk | 34 | 50% | 32% | 15% |
4 | Anzhi Makhachkala | 34 | 65% | 38% | 15% |
5 | FK Volga Nizhny Novgorod | 34 | 47% | 32% | 21% |
6 | Tosno | 34 | 44% | 18% | 3% |
7 | SKA Khabarovsk | 34 | 62% | 38% | 6% |
8 | Shinnik | 34 | 56% | 32% | 15% |
9 | Yenisey | 34 | 50% | 18% | 9% |
10 | Sibir | 34 | 68% | 32% | 3% |
11 | Luch Vladivostok | 34 | 59% | 32% | 12% |
12 | Baltika | 34 | 56% | 29% | 18% |
13 | FK Sochi | 34 | 41% | 18% | 6% |
14 | Volgar Astrakhan | 34 | 59% | 35% | 12% |
15 | Tyumen | 34 | 65% | 26% | 9% |
16 | Sokol Saratov | 34 | 53% | 24% | 18% |
17 | Khimik Dzerzhinsk | 34 | 68% | 29% | 12% |
18 | Sakhalin | 34 | 44% | 21% | 18% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Khimik Dzerzhinsk’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 32% of their games played so far in the FNL 2014/2015.
And on the other side of the ball, Khimik Dzerzhinsk’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 68% of their FNL matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Khimik Dzerzhinsk this season in the FNL:
You can follow the Khimik Dzerzhinsk’s card situation in FNL all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.