Season
Country
2021/22
Italy
| # | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Gavorrano |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Arezzo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Poggibonsi |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Foligno |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
FC Rieti |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Sangiovannese 1927 |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Pianese |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Cannara |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Scandicci |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
San Donato Tavarnelle |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Flaminia |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Sporting Trestina |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Pro Livorno |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Tiferno Lerchi |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 15 |
Lornano Badesse |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Montespaccato |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 17 |
Cascina |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Unipomezia |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Gavorrano |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Arezzo |
34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Poggibonsi |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Foligno |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
FC Rieti |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Sangiovannese 1927 |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Pianese |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Cannara |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Scandicci |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
San Donato Tavarnelle |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Flaminia |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Sporting Trestina |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Pro Livorno |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Tiferno Lerchi |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 15 |
Lornano Badesse |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Montespaccato |
34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 17 |
Cascina |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Unipomezia |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| # | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Gavorrano |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 2 |
Arezzo |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 3 |
Poggibonsi |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 4 |
Foligno |
34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 5 |
FC Rieti |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 6 |
Sangiovannese 1927 |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 7 |
Pianese |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 8 |
Cannara |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 9 |
Scandicci |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 10 |
San Donato Tavarnelle |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 11 |
Flaminia |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 12 |
Sporting Trestina |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 13 |
Pro Livorno |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 14 |
Tiferno Lerchi |
34 | 3% | 0% | 0% |
| 15 |
Lornano Badesse |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 16 |
Montespaccato |
34 | 3% | 3% | 3% |
| 17 |
Cascina |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| 18 |
Unipomezia |
34 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
Card statistics provide a unique insight into the team’s strategy or mentality in matches. A team that picks up a host of cards might be more aggressive than the average team defensively and is more prone to committing fouls due to their tough challenges. It’s also possible that a team that keeps getting booked may have a bit of a disciplinary problem.
In the case of Cascina’s cards statistics, they have received 3 or more cards in 0% of their games played so far in the Serie D Group E 2021/2022.
And on the other side of the ball, Cascina’s opponents take 2 or more cards in 0% of their Serie D Group E matches.
Here are two more card statistics for Cascina this season in the Serie D Group E:
You can follow the Cascina’s card situation in Serie D Group E all season long by checking out how many cards they or their opponents have received on this page.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.