Favourite this Match

Shimizu S-Pulse 8 - 0 Tokuyama University SC

01.06.2022 - 06:00

Stadium: IAI Stadium Nihondaira (Shizuoka)

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
ThespaKusatsu Gunma Team Logo

ThespaKusatsu Gunma

3 1 33%
2
Tokushima Vortis Team Logo

Tokushima Vortis

2 2 100%
3
Kyoto Sanga Team Logo

Kyoto Sanga

5 4 80%
4
Yokohama Team Logo

Yokohama

2 1 50%
5
Shimizu S-Pulse Team Logo

Shimizu S-Pulse

2 0 0%
6
Mito Hollyhock Team Logo

Mito Hollyhock

1 1 100%
7
Consadole Sapporo Team Logo

Consadole Sapporo

2 2 100%
8
JEF United Team Logo

JEF United

1 1 100%
9
Gifu Team Logo

Gifu

2 2 100%
10
Fagiano Okayama Team Logo

Fagiano Okayama

1 0 0%
11
Giravanz Kitakyushu Team Logo

Giravanz Kitakyushu

1 1 100%
12
Zweigen Kanazawa Team Logo

Zweigen Kanazawa

2 1 50%
13
Matsumoto Yamaga Team Logo

Matsumoto Yamaga

2 2 100%
14
Cerezo Osaka Team Logo

Cerezo Osaka

4 4 100%
15
Montedio Yamagata Team Logo

Montedio Yamagata

1 1 100%
16
Tokyo Verdy Team Logo

Tokyo Verdy

4 3 75%
17
Roasso Kumamoto Team Logo

Roasso Kumamoto

2 2 100%
18
Renofa Yamaguchi Team Logo

Renofa Yamaguchi

2 2 100%
19
Machida Zelvia Team Logo

Machida Zelvia

1 1 100%
20
V-Varen Nagasaki Team Logo

V-Varen Nagasaki

3 1 33%
21
Jubilo Iwata Team Logo

Jubilo Iwata

3 2 67%
22
Oita Trinita Team Logo

Oita Trinita

2 1 50%
23
Omiya Ardija Team Logo

Omiya Ardija

2 1 50%
24
Avispa Fukuoka Team Logo

Avispa Fukuoka

4 2 50%
25
Tochigi Team Logo

Tochigi

3 1 33%
26
Shonan Bellmare Team Logo

Shonan Bellmare

2 0 0%
27
Kataller Toyama Team Logo

Kataller Toyama

2 1 50%
28
Nagoya Grampus Team Logo

Nagoya Grampus

3 1 33%
29
Yokohama F. Marinos Team Logo

Yokohama F. Marinos

2 0 0%
30
Urawa Reds Team Logo

Urawa Reds

2 0 0%
31
Sagan Tosu Team Logo

Sagan Tosu

3 2 67%
32
Gamba Osaka Team Logo

Gamba Osaka

3 2 67%
33
Kashima Antlers Team Logo

Kashima Antlers

5 1 20%
34
Sanfrecce Hiroshima Team Logo

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

6 3 50%
35
Vissel Kobe Team Logo

Vissel Kobe

4 3 75%
36
Vegalta Sendai Team Logo

Vegalta Sendai

2 2 100%
37
Tokyo Team Logo

Tokyo

2 1 50%
38
Albirex Niigata Team Logo

Albirex Niigata

1 1 100%
39
Kashiwa Reysol Team Logo

Kashiwa Reysol

3 2 67%
40
Kawasaki Frontale Team Logo

Kawasaki Frontale

2 0 0%
41
Ventforet Kofu Team Logo

Ventforet Kofu

6 5 83%
42
Kagoshima United Team Logo

Kagoshima United

2 1 50%
43
Grulla Morioka Team Logo

Grulla Morioka

2 2 100%
44
Fujieda MYFC Team Logo

Fujieda MYFC

1 0 0%
45
Fukushima United Team Logo

Fukushima United

2 1 50%
46
Ryūkyū Team Logo

Ryūkyū

1 1 100%
47
Gainare Tottori Team Logo

Gainare Tottori

1 0 0%
48
Blaublitz Akita Team Logo

Blaublitz Akita

1 1 100%
49
Biwako Shiga Team Logo

Biwako Shiga

1 1 100%
50
Honda Lock Team Logo

Honda Lock

2 0 0%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Shimizu S-Pulse and Tokuyama University SC have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Emperor Cup.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 2 matches played in the Emperor Cup, Shimizu S-Pulse has scored and conceded goals in 0 matches. In other words, 0% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 0% at home, while it is 0% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Tokuyama University SC has scored and conceded in 0 of their 2 matches so far in the Emperor Cup, giving them a BTTS rate of 0%. Both teams have scored in 0 of Tokuyama University SC’s 0 home matches, and it has happened 0 times in 2 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets