Shandong Luneng 3 - 0 Meizhou Hakka
27.12.2022 - 07:00
Stadium: Jinan Olympic Sports Center Stadium
Finished
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dalian Yifang |
33 | 76% | 58% | 58% | 39% | 27% | 15% | 6% | 9.55 |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
33 | 70% | 58% | 58% | 33% | 21% | 18% | 12% | 9.52 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai |
33 | 76% | 64% | 52% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 9.3 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou |
33 | 61% | 48% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 15% | 12% | 9.15 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng |
33 | 70% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 6% | 9.07 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
33 | 67% | 48% | 36% | 24% | 21% | 12% | 6% | 9 |
| 7 |
Shanghai SIPG |
33 | 67% | 55% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 18% | 9 |
| 8 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
33 | 67% | 55% | 42% | 33% | 21% | 12% | 3% | 9 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan |
33 | 64% | 48% | 39% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 8.97 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
33 | 61% | 48% | 39% | 30% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 8.94 |
| 11 |
Henan Jianye |
33 | 61% | 48% | 42% | 24% | 15% | 15% | 12% | 8.87 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Zall |
33 | 67% | 55% | 33% | 24% | 21% | 15% | 9% | 8.73 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen |
33 | 67% | 45% | 36% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 3% | 8.69 |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
33 | 55% | 52% | 42% | 27% | 12% | 9% | 6% | 8.57 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
33 | 55% | 48% | 33% | 24% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 8.37 |
| 16 |
Hebei CFFC |
33 | 67% | 39% | 24% | 15% | 12% | 9% | 3% | 8.31 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Teda |
33 | 55% | 36% | 27% | 15% | 15% | 9% | 6% | 7.84 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
33 | 45% | 36% | 30% | 18% | 9% | 6% | 6% | 7.73 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 76% | 53% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 9.35 |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 75% | 69% | 69% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 13% | 9.76 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 76% | 53% | 35% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 8.65 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 75% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 10.93 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 69% | 50% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 8.6 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 76% | 59% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 9.7 |
| 7 |
Shanghai SIPG |
16 | 69% | 44% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 7.69 |
| 8 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 69% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 0% | 9.19 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 9.63 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 56% | 50% | 50% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 31% | 9.38 |
| 11 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 53% | 41% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.69 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 59% | 53% | 35% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 8.53 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 71% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 8.48 |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 50% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.44 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 63% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 9.06 |
| 16 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 63% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 8.47 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 53% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 7.18 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 29% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 7.18 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 75% | 63% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 19% | 6% | 9.75 |
| 2 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 65% | 47% | 47% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 9.3 |
| 3 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 75% | 75% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 10 |
| 4 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 47% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 7.59 |
| 5 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 71% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 9.47 |
| 6 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 56% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 8.25 |
| 7 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 65% | 65% | 41% | 35% | 29% | 29% | 29% | 10.31 |
| 8 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 8.82 |
| 9 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 63% | 44% | 38% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 8.31 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 65% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 11 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 25% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 9.07 |
| 12 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 75% | 56% | 31% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 8.94 |
| 13 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 63% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 8.94 |
| 14 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 59% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 8.69 |
| 15 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7.71 |
| 16 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 71% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 8.18 |
| 17 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 56% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 18 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
16 | 63% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 8.31 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
31 | 65% | 39% | 29% | 19% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.39 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
31 | 65% | 26% | 6% | 6% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2.97 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
31 | 84% | 74% | 55% | 42% | 35% | 29% | 13% | 5.5 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
31 | 81% | 74% | 58% | 29% | 23% | 16% | 13% | 4.84 |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
31 | 84% | 65% | 55% | 35% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.56 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
31 | 87% | 74% | 58% | 45% | 42% | 26% | 10% | 5.44 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
31 | 29% | 23% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.09 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
31 | 74% | 68% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 16% | 13% | 4.36 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
31 | 97% | 87% | 77% | 48% | 35% | 29% | 23% | 6.38 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
31 | 42% | 32% | 26% | 19% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 2.91 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
31 | 71% | 58% | 45% | 29% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 3.79 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
31 | 71% | 55% | 39% | 26% | 13% | 10% | 3% | 4 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
31 | 103% | 81% | 71% | 48% | 32% | 26% | 16% | 5.58 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
31 | 68% | 55% | 42% | 26% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 3.91 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
31 | 84% | 52% | 35% | 16% | 3% | 3% | 0% | 3.7 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
31 | 81% | 65% | 52% | 35% | 16% | 13% | 6% | 4.63 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
31 | 90% | 77% | 52% | 35% | 32% | 29% | 23% | 5.64 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
31 | 87% | 81% | 71% | 52% | 39% | 32% | 16% | 5.64 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 59% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.29 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 59% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
16 | 69% | 63% | 44% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 6% | 4.5 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 76% | 71% | 53% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 4.81 |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 81% | 56% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 82% | 65% | 53% | 47% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 6.13 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 25% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.2 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 88% | 82% | 53% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 6% | 4.71 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 88% | 75% | 69% | 44% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 5.93 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 44% | 38% | 38% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 3.38 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 75% | 69% | 63% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 4.56 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 59% | 47% | 35% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.59 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 100% | 76% | 71% | 41% | 29% | 24% | 12% | 5.59 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.24 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 71% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.35 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 81% | 69% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 88% | 81% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 6.13 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 81% | 81% | 63% | 50% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 5.81 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
16 | 63% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.25 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 88% | 76% | 59% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6.5 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 75% | 69% | 56% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 4.88 |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 76% | 65% | 47% | 24% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 81% | 75% | 56% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 0% | 4.75 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 29% | 24% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 50% | 44% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 4 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 94% | 88% | 76% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 24% | 6.76 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 35% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 2.44 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 59% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 3.06 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 75% | 56% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 6% | 4.47 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 94% | 75% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 5.56 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 69% | 56% | 50% | 38% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.67 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 88% | 56% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 4.06 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 71% | 53% | 47% | 29% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 4.75 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 82% | 65% | 41% | 24% | 24% | 24% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 82% | 71% | 71% | 47% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 5.47 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
31 | 97% | 87% | 71% | 42% | 29% | 23% | 19% | 5.61 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
31 | 81% | 71% | 52% | 35% | 26% | 19% | 13% | 4.76 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
31 | 61% | 45% | 29% | 26% | 10% | 10% | 6% | 3.5 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
31 | 71% | 52% | 39% | 23% | 13% | 13% | 10% | 4.03 |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
31 | 68% | 58% | 42% | 23% | 19% | 16% | 10% | 4.59 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
31 | 65% | 45% | 29% | 19% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 3.53 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
31 | 90% | 87% | 81% | 68% | 52% | 23% | 10% | 6.22 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
31 | 84% | 58% | 48% | 39% | 26% | 23% | 16% | 4.94 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
31 | 58% | 29% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.69 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
31 | 84% | 77% | 68% | 52% | 39% | 29% | 19% | 6.03 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
31 | 84% | 71% | 48% | 32% | 19% | 16% | 10% | 4.58 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
31 | 87% | 48% | 26% | 19% | 16% | 6% | 0% | 3.84 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
31 | 71% | 61% | 48% | 32% | 10% | 6% | 3% | 3.97 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
31 | 90% | 77% | 52% | 29% | 19% | 13% | 6% | 4.78 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
31 | 84% | 71% | 55% | 45% | 29% | 23% | 13% | 5.03 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
31 | 68% | 48% | 39% | 19% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
31 | 61% | 52% | 45% | 26% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.88 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
31 | 58% | 45% | 42% | 16% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.36 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 94% | 88% | 71% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 6.41 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 76% | 59% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.47 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
16 | 56% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.19 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
17 | 59% | 29% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 3.88 |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
16 | 69% | 63% | 56% | 31% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 5.73 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 0% | 3.5 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
16 | 81% | 81% | 69% | 56% | 44% | 19% | 13% | 6.27 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
17 | 71% | 47% | 29% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
16 | 56% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.67 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
16 | 75% | 69% | 63% | 44% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 6 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 38% | 25% | 19% | 13% | 4.5 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
17 | 82% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 3.59 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
17 | 65% | 59% | 47% | 29% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.76 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
17 | 100% | 76% | 53% | 35% | 29% | 18% | 6% | 5.24 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
17 | 76% | 65% | 53% | 41% | 29% | 29% | 18% | 5.18 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
16 | 75% | 50% | 38% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
16 | 50% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 6% | 6% | 0% | 3.63 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
16 | 56% | 50% | 44% | 13% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.38 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Guangzhou Evergrande |
16 | 88% | 75% | 63% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 4.75 |
| 2 |
Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
16 | 75% | 75% | 69% | 38% | 31% | 19% | 13% | 5.06 |
| 3 |
Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 59% | 47% | 29% | 29% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 3.81 |
| 4 |
Henan Jianye |
16 | 75% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.19 |
| 5 |
Hangzhou |
17 | 59% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 12% | 0% | 3.59 |
| 6 |
Beijing Guoan |
16 | 63% | 38% | 25% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 6% | 3.56 |
| 7 |
Hebei CFFC |
17 | 88% | 82% | 82% | 71% | 53% | 24% | 6% | 6.18 |
| 8 |
Changchun Yatai |
16 | 88% | 63% | 63% | 50% | 31% | 31% | 25% | 6 |
| 9 |
Shandong Luneng |
17 | 53% | 24% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.71 |
| 10 |
Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 82% | 76% | 65% | 53% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 6.06 |
| 11 |
Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 88% | 76% | 47% | 24% | 12% | 12% | 6% | 4.65 |
| 12 |
Tianjin Teda |
16 | 81% | 56% | 25% | 19% | 19% | 0% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 13 |
Dalian Yifang |
16 | 69% | 56% | 44% | 31% | 13% | 6% | 6% | 4.19 |
| 14 |
Shenzhen |
16 | 69% | 69% | 44% | 19% | 6% | 6% | 6% | 4.27 |
| 15 |
Wuhan Zall |
16 | 81% | 69% | 50% | 44% | 25% | 13% | 6% | 4.88 |
| 16 |
Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 53% | 41% | 35% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 6% | 3.94 |
| 17 |
Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 65% | 47% | 41% | 24% | 18% | 18% | 12% | 4.12 |
| 18 |
Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 53% | 35% | 35% | 18% | 12% | 6% | 0% | 3.35 |
The average number of corners for Shandong Luneng vs Meizhou Hakka can greatly help your analysis of the match, as it can point to the attacking tendencies of both teams over the course of the campaign.
Matches involving Shandong Luneng have averaged 9.07 corners per match during this Chinese Super League campaign. They have taken 6.38 corners per match, while they concede an average of 2.69 to their opponents.
As for their upcoming opponent, Meizhou Hakka, their corner stats are the following:
- Average number of corners in matches involving Meizhou Hakka: 8.57
- Average number of corners in favour: 4.63
- Average number of corners conceded: 3.94
Corners can be a valuable statistic to look into when looking at a particular match like Shandong Luneng vs Meizhou Hakka. Examining the average number of corners helps measure the offensive intent of both teams since being on the opposition half of the pitch increases the chances of winning more corners.
Corners conceded stats can also shed more light on a team’s defence and how they can capably prevent their opponents from having the ball in dangerous areas on the pitch.