Favourite this Match

Poggibonsi 2 - 0 Flaminia

20.02.2022 - 08:30

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Gavorrano Team Logo

Gavorrano

34 16 47%
2
Arezzo Team Logo

Arezzo

34 22 65%
3
Poggibonsi Team Logo

Poggibonsi

34 17 50%
4
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

34 21 62%
5
FC Rieti Team Logo

FC Rieti

34 21 62%
6
Sangiovannese 1927 Team Logo

Sangiovannese 1927

34 15 44%
7
Pianese Team Logo

Pianese

34 17 50%
8
Cannara Team Logo

Cannara

34 15 44%
9
Scandicci Team Logo

Scandicci

34 19 56%
10
San Donato Tavarnelle Team Logo

San Donato Tavarnelle

34 15 44%
11
Flaminia Team Logo

Flaminia

34 21 62%
12
Sporting Trestina Team Logo

Sporting Trestina

34 18 53%
13
Pro Livorno Team Logo

Pro Livorno

34 20 59%
14
Tiferno Lerchi Team Logo

Tiferno Lerchi

34 18 53%
15
Lornano Badesse Team Logo

Lornano Badesse

34 18 53%
16
Montespaccato Team Logo

Montespaccato

34 16 47%
17
Cascina Team Logo

Cascina

34 15 44%
18
Unipomezia Team Logo

Unipomezia

34 20 59%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Gavorrano Team Logo

Gavorrano

17 7 41%
2
Arezzo Team Logo

Arezzo

17 11 65%
3
Poggibonsi Team Logo

Poggibonsi

17 8 47%
4
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

17 11 65%
5
FC Rieti Team Logo

FC Rieti

17 10 59%
6
Sangiovannese 1927 Team Logo

Sangiovannese 1927

17 6 35%
7
Pianese Team Logo

Pianese

17 10 59%
8
Cannara Team Logo

Cannara

17 6 35%
9
Scandicci Team Logo

Scandicci

17 9 53%
10
San Donato Tavarnelle Team Logo

San Donato Tavarnelle

17 10 59%
11
Flaminia Team Logo

Flaminia

17 11 65%
12
Sporting Trestina Team Logo

Sporting Trestina

17 9 53%
13
Pro Livorno Team Logo

Pro Livorno

17 8 47%
14
Tiferno Lerchi Team Logo

Tiferno Lerchi

17 10 59%
15
Lornano Badesse Team Logo

Lornano Badesse

17 8 47%
16
Montespaccato Team Logo

Montespaccato

17 9 53%
17
Cascina Team Logo

Cascina

17 8 47%
18
Unipomezia Team Logo

Unipomezia

17 11 65%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Gavorrano Team Logo

Gavorrano

17 9 53%
2
Arezzo Team Logo

Arezzo

17 11 65%
3
Poggibonsi Team Logo

Poggibonsi

17 9 53%
4
Foligno Team Logo

Foligno

17 10 59%
5
FC Rieti Team Logo

FC Rieti

17 11 65%
6
Sangiovannese 1927 Team Logo

Sangiovannese 1927

17 9 53%
7
Pianese Team Logo

Pianese

17 7 41%
8
Cannara Team Logo

Cannara

17 9 53%
9
Scandicci Team Logo

Scandicci

17 10 59%
10
San Donato Tavarnelle Team Logo

San Donato Tavarnelle

17 5 29%
11
Flaminia Team Logo

Flaminia

17 10 59%
12
Sporting Trestina Team Logo

Sporting Trestina

17 9 53%
13
Pro Livorno Team Logo

Pro Livorno

17 12 71%
14
Tiferno Lerchi Team Logo

Tiferno Lerchi

17 8 47%
15
Lornano Badesse Team Logo

Lornano Badesse

17 10 59%
16
Montespaccato Team Logo

Montespaccato

17 7 41%
17
Cascina Team Logo

Cascina

17 7 41%
18
Unipomezia Team Logo

Unipomezia

17 9 53%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Poggibonsi and Flaminia have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group E.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 34 matches played in the Serie D Group E, Poggibonsi has scored and conceded goals in 17 matches. In other words, 50% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 47% at home, while it is 53% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Flaminia has scored and conceded in 21 of their 34 matches so far in the Serie D Group E, giving them a BTTS rate of 62%. Both teams have scored in 11 of Flaminia’s 17 home matches, and it has happened 10 times in 17 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets