# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht |
40 | 22 | 55% |
2 |
![]() Club Brugge |
40 | 23 | 58% |
3 |
![]() KAA Gent |
40 | 18 | 45% |
4 |
![]() Standard Liège |
34 | 17 | 50% |
5 |
![]() Sporting Charleroi |
40 | 18 | 45% |
6 |
![]() AS Eupen |
34 | 18 | 53% |
7 |
![]() KV Oostende |
34 | 15 | 44% |
8 |
![]() Sint-Truiden |
34 | 18 | 53% |
9 |
![]() KRC Genk |
40 | 22 | 55% |
10 |
![]() Zulte-Waregem |
34 | 20 | 59% |
11 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
34 | 18 | 53% |
12 |
![]() KV Mechelen |
40 | 25 | 63% |
13 |
![]() OH Leuven |
34 | 23 | 68% |
14 |
![]() Royal Antwerp FC |
40 | 22 | 55% |
15 |
![]() Cercle Brugge |
34 | 21 | 62% |
16 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
34 | 16 | 47% |
17 |
![]() Union Saint-Gilloise |
40 | 17 | 43% |
18 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
34 | 13 | 38% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht |
20 | 12 | 60% |
2 |
![]() Club Brugge |
20 | 11 | 55% |
3 |
![]() KAA Gent |
20 | 10 | 50% |
4 |
![]() Standard Liège |
17 | 9 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Sporting Charleroi |
20 | 7 | 35% |
6 |
![]() AS Eupen |
17 | 10 | 59% |
7 |
![]() KV Oostende |
17 | 10 | 59% |
8 |
![]() Sint-Truiden |
17 | 12 | 71% |
9 |
![]() KRC Genk |
20 | 10 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Zulte-Waregem |
17 | 10 | 59% |
11 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
17 | 9 | 53% |
12 |
![]() KV Mechelen |
20 | 13 | 65% |
13 |
![]() OH Leuven |
17 | 11 | 65% |
14 |
![]() Royal Antwerp FC |
20 | 11 | 55% |
15 |
![]() Cercle Brugge |
17 | 9 | 53% |
16 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
17 | 5 | 29% |
17 |
![]() Union Saint-Gilloise |
20 | 8 | 40% |
18 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
17 | 6 | 35% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() RSC Anderlecht |
20 | 10 | 50% |
2 |
![]() Club Brugge |
20 | 12 | 60% |
3 |
![]() KAA Gent |
20 | 8 | 40% |
4 |
![]() Standard Liège |
17 | 8 | 47% |
5 |
![]() Sporting Charleroi |
20 | 11 | 55% |
6 |
![]() AS Eupen |
17 | 8 | 47% |
7 |
![]() KV Oostende |
17 | 5 | 29% |
8 |
![]() Sint-Truiden |
17 | 6 | 35% |
9 |
![]() KRC Genk |
20 | 12 | 60% |
10 |
![]() Zulte-Waregem |
17 | 10 | 59% |
11 |
![]() KV Kortrijk |
17 | 9 | 53% |
12 |
![]() KV Mechelen |
20 | 12 | 60% |
13 |
![]() OH Leuven |
17 | 12 | 71% |
14 |
![]() Royal Antwerp FC |
20 | 11 | 55% |
15 |
![]() Cercle Brugge |
17 | 12 | 71% |
16 |
![]() Beerschot-Wilrijk |
17 | 11 | 65% |
17 |
![]() Union Saint-Gilloise |
20 | 9 | 45% |
18 |
![]() RFC Seraing |
17 | 7 | 41% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times KAA Gent and Zulte-Waregem have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Pro League.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.