Gamba Osaka vs Shimizu S-Pulse Both Teams Score Stats

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Tokushima Vortis	38	15	39%
2	Yokohama	38	18	47%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	38	19	50%
4	Consadole Sapporo	38	19	50%
5	Cerezo Osaka	38	21	55%
6	Oita Trinita	38	16	42%
7	Avispa Fukuoka	38	18	47%
8	Shonan Bellmare	38	20	53%
9	Nagoya Grampus	38	11	29%
10	Yokohama F. Marinos	38	18	47%
11	Urawa Reds	38	13	34%
12	Sagan Tosu	38	13	34%
13	Gamba Osaka	38	16	42%
14	Kashima Antlers	38	19	50%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	38	19	50%
16	Vissel Kobe	38	20	53%
17	Vegalta Sendai	38	19	50%
18	Tokyo	38	16	42%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	38	19	50%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	38	21	55%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Tokushima Vortis

39%

Yokohama

47%

Shimizu S-Pulse

50%

Consadole Sapporo

50%

Cerezo Osaka

55%

Oita Trinita

42%

Avispa Fukuoka

47%

Shonan Bellmare

53%

Nagoya Grampus

29%

Yokohama F. Marinos

47%

Urawa Reds

34%

Sagan Tosu

34%

Gamba Osaka

42%

Kashima Antlers

50%

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

50%

Vissel Kobe

53%

Vegalta Sendai

50%

Tokyo

42%

Kashiwa Reysol

50%

Kawasaki Frontale

55%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Tokushima Vortis	19	10	53%
2	Yokohama	19	9	47%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	19	7	37%
4	Consadole Sapporo	19	9	47%
5	Cerezo Osaka	19	13	68%
6	Oita Trinita	19	8	42%
7	Avispa Fukuoka	19	10	53%
8	Shonan Bellmare	19	7	37%
9	Nagoya Grampus	19	4	21%
10	Yokohama F. Marinos	19	7	37%
11	Urawa Reds	19	8	42%
12	Sagan Tosu	19	6	32%
13	Gamba Osaka	19	9	47%
14	Kashima Antlers	19	10	53%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	19	11	58%
16	Vissel Kobe	19	8	42%
17	Vegalta Sendai	19	7	37%
18	Tokyo	19	10	53%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	19	11	58%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	19	11	58%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Tokushima Vortis

53%

Yokohama

47%

Shimizu S-Pulse

37%

Consadole Sapporo

47%

Cerezo Osaka

68%

Oita Trinita

42%

Avispa Fukuoka

53%

Shonan Bellmare

37%

Nagoya Grampus

21%

Yokohama F. Marinos

37%

Urawa Reds

42%

Sagan Tosu

32%

Gamba Osaka

47%

Kashima Antlers

53%

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

58%

Vissel Kobe

42%

Vegalta Sendai

37%

Tokyo

53%

Kashiwa Reysol

58%

Kawasaki Frontale

58%

#	Team	MP	BTTS	BTTS%
1	Tokushima Vortis	19	5	26%
2	Yokohama	19	9	47%
3	Shimizu S-Pulse	19	12	63%
4	Consadole Sapporo	19	10	53%
5	Cerezo Osaka	19	8	42%
6	Oita Trinita	19	8	42%
7	Avispa Fukuoka	19	8	42%
8	Shonan Bellmare	19	13	68%
9	Nagoya Grampus	19	7	37%
10	Yokohama F. Marinos	19	11	58%
11	Urawa Reds	19	5	26%
12	Sagan Tosu	19	7	37%
13	Gamba Osaka	19	7	37%
14	Kashima Antlers	19	9	47%
15	Sanfrecce Hiroshima	19	8	42%
16	Vissel Kobe	19	12	63%
17	Vegalta Sendai	19	12	63%
18	Tokyo	19	6	32%
19	Kashiwa Reysol	19	8	42%
20	Kawasaki Frontale	19	10	53%

Team

BTTS

BTTS%

Tokushima Vortis

26%

Yokohama

47%

Shimizu S-Pulse

63%

Consadole Sapporo

53%

Cerezo Osaka

42%

Oita Trinita

42%

Avispa Fukuoka

42%

Shonan Bellmare

68%

Nagoya Grampus

37%

Yokohama F. Marinos

58%

Urawa Reds

26%

Sagan Tosu

37%

Gamba Osaka

37%

Kashima Antlers

47%

Sanfrecce Hiroshima

42%

Vissel Kobe

63%

Vegalta Sendai

63%

Tokyo

32%

Kashiwa Reysol

42%

Kawasaki Frontale

53%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Gamba Osaka and Shimizu S-Pulse have both scored and conceded in the same match in the J1 League.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

In 38 matches played in the J. League, Gamba Osaka has scored and conceded goals in 16 matches. In other words, 42% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 47% at home, while it is 37% away from home.
Meanwhile, Shimizu S-Pulse has scored and conceded in 19 of their 38 matches so far in the J1 League, giving them a BTTS rate of 50%. Both teams have scored in 7 of Shimizu S-Pulse’s 19 home matches, and it has happened 12 times in 19 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets

Gamba Osaka 0 - 0 Shimizu S-Pulse

Both Teams to Score