Favourite this Match

Clivense 1 - 0 Tritium

24.03.2024 - 09:30

Finished

Both Teams to Score

# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

38 19 50%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

38 16 42%
3
Legnano Team Logo

Legnano

38 14 37%
4
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

38 16 42%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

38 16 42%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

38 21 55%
7
Folgore Caratese Team Logo

Folgore Caratese

38 20 53%
8
Castellanzese Team Logo

Castellanzese

38 19 50%
9
Arconatese Team Logo

Arconatese

38 18 47%
10
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

38 21 55%
11
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

38 17 45%
12
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

38 17 45%
13
Crema Team Logo

Crema

38 10 26%
14
Varesina Team Logo

Varesina

38 20 53%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

38 17 45%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

38 23 61%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

38 17 45%
18
Clivense Team Logo

Clivense

38 19 50%
19
Club Milano Team Logo

Club Milano

38 20 53%
20
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

38 14 37%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

19 8 42%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

19 7 37%
3
Legnano Team Logo

Legnano

19 7 37%
4
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

19 8 42%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

19 9 47%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

19 11 58%
7
Folgore Caratese Team Logo

Folgore Caratese

19 11 58%
8
Castellanzese Team Logo

Castellanzese

19 9 47%
9
Arconatese Team Logo

Arconatese

19 12 63%
10
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

19 11 58%
11
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

19 10 53%
12
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

19 5 26%
13
Crema Team Logo

Crema

19 4 21%
14
Varesina Team Logo

Varesina

19 8 42%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

19 11 58%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

19 13 68%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

19 8 42%
18
Clivense Team Logo

Clivense

19 12 63%
19
Club Milano Team Logo

Club Milano

19 10 53%
20
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

19 3 16%
# Team MP BTTS BTTS%
1
Piacenza Team Logo

Piacenza

19 11 58%
2
Pontisola Team Logo

Pontisola

19 9 47%
3
Legnano Team Logo

Legnano

19 7 37%
4
Tritium Team Logo

Tritium

19 8 42%
5
Caravaggio Team Logo

Caravaggio

19 7 37%
6
Virtus Ciserano Bergamo Team Logo

Virtus Ciserano Bergamo

19 10 53%
7
Folgore Caratese Team Logo

Folgore Caratese

19 9 47%
8
Castellanzese Team Logo

Castellanzese

19 10 53%
9
Arconatese Team Logo

Arconatese

19 6 32%
10
Brusaporto Team Logo

Brusaporto

19 10 53%
11
Villa Valle Team Logo

Villa Valle

19 7 37%
12
Caldiero Terme Team Logo

Caldiero Terme

19 12 63%
13
Crema Team Logo

Crema

19 6 32%
14
Varesina Team Logo

Varesina

19 12 63%
15
Desenzano Calvina Team Logo

Desenzano Calvina

19 6 32%
16
Casatese Team Logo

Casatese

19 10 53%
17
Real Calepina Team Logo

Real Calepina

19 9 47%
18
Clivense Team Logo

Clivense

19 7 37%
19
Club Milano Team Logo

Club Milano

19 10 53%
20
Pro Palazzolo Team Logo

Pro Palazzolo

19 11 58%

This section shows the statistics on how many times Clivense and Tritium have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Serie D Group B.

The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.

Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:

  • In 38 matches played in the Serie D Group B, Clivense has scored and conceded goals in 19 matches. In other words, 50% of its matches have seen both teams score. Their BTTS percentage is 63% at home, while it is 37% away from home.
  • Meanwhile, Tritium has scored and conceded in 16 of their 38 matches so far in the Serie D Group B, giving them a BTTS rate of 42%. Both teams have scored in 8 of Tritium’s 19 home matches, and it has happened 8 times in 19 matches as the away side.

It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.

And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets