Country
Teams
Season
Matches
Brazil
35
2025
205/322
# | Team | MP | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Novo Hamburgo |
22 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
2 |
![]() Lajeadense |
17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Aimoré |
20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Veranópolis Esporte Clube Recreativo e Cultural |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Glória |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sport Club GaúchoSport Club Gaúcho |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Inter Santa Maria |
20 | 5% | 5% | 5% |
8 |
![]() Passo Fundo |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Esportivo |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Bagé |
17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() União RS |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Grêmio U20 |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Internacional U20 |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Brasil de Pelotas U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Juventude U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() São José PA U20 |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Brasil Farroupilha |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Santa Cruz RS |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Gramadense |
19 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Real SC |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Futebol Com Vida |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() São Luiz U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Real SC U20 |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Novo Hamburgo U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Ypiranga PE U20 |
9 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Caxias U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() APAFUT U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() EC Pelotas U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() SERC Brasil U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() Cruzeiro-RS U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Grêmio Esportivo Brasil U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Esportivo U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Ivoti U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Grêmio Esportivo Brasil U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() EC Pelotas U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Novo Hamburgo |
22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Lajeadense |
17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Aimoré |
20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Veranópolis Esporte Clube Recreativo e Cultural |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Glória |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sport Club GaúchoSport Club Gaúcho |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Inter Santa Maria |
20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Passo Fundo |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Esportivo |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Bagé |
17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() União RS |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Grêmio U20 |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Internacional U20 |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Brasil de Pelotas U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Juventude U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() São José PA U20 |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Brasil Farroupilha |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Santa Cruz RS |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Gramadense |
19 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Real SC |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Futebol Com Vida |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() São Luiz U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Real SC U20 |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Novo Hamburgo U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Ypiranga PE U20 |
9 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Caxias U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() APAFUT U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() EC Pelotas U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() SERC Brasil U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() Cruzeiro-RS U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Grêmio Esportivo Brasil U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Esportivo U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Ivoti U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Grêmio Esportivo Brasil U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() EC Pelotas U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Over 1.5 | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Novo Hamburgo |
22 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
2 |
![]() Lajeadense |
17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
3 |
![]() Aimoré |
20 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
4 |
![]() Veranópolis Esporte Clube Recreativo e Cultural |
18 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
5 |
![]() Glória |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
6 |
![]() Sport Club GaúchoSport Club Gaúcho |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
7 |
![]() Inter Santa Maria |
20 | 5% | 5% | 0% |
8 |
![]() Passo Fundo |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
9 |
![]() Esportivo |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
10 |
![]() Bagé |
17 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
11 |
![]() União RS |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
12 |
![]() Grêmio U20 |
13 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
13 |
![]() Internacional U20 |
12 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
14 |
![]() Brasil de Pelotas U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
15 |
![]() Juventude U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
16 |
![]() São José PA U20 |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
17 |
![]() Brasil Farroupilha |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
18 |
![]() Santa Cruz RS |
15 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
19 |
![]() Gramadense |
19 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
20 |
![]() Real SC |
16 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
21 |
![]() Futebol Com Vida |
1 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
22 |
![]() São Luiz U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
23 |
![]() Real SC U20 |
11 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
24 |
![]() Novo Hamburgo U20 |
8 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
25 |
![]() Ypiranga PE U20 |
9 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
26 |
![]() Caxias U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
27 |
![]() APAFUT U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
28 |
![]() EC Pelotas U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
29 |
![]() SERC Brasil U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
30 |
![]() Cruzeiro-RS U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
31 |
![]() Grêmio Esportivo Brasil U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
32 |
![]() Esportivo U20 |
6 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
33 |
![]() Ivoti U20 |
7 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
34 |
![]() Grêmio Esportivo Brasil U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
35 |
![]() EC Pelotas U20 |
0 | 0% | 0% | 0% |
This is the place where you can track the card statistics of all the teams taking part in the Gaucho 2. Aside from finding out how many yellow and red cards a team is usually handed out in a match, you can also see how many cards a club’s opponents usually receive over the course of their contests.
These are the current card statistics in Gaucho 2:
And aside from the overall card stats, you can also toggle the table to see what percentage of a team’s matches a team or their opponent receives over 1.5, 2.5, or 3.5 cards. This way, it is easier to find which teams are truly the most ill-disciplined when it comes to bookings.
Now, here are some FAQs about the Gaucho 2 cards.
Novo Hamburgo leads the cards table with over 1.5 bookings in 5% of their matches in Gaucho 2. Novo Hamburgo has the most matches of over 2.5 cards with 5%, and Novo Hamburgo tops the over 3.5 cards table with 0% of matches.
You can see in the table above the percentage of matches for each team that reaches over 3.5, 4.5, and 5.5 total cards. You can also check the percentage of matches with 1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 cards for and against each team. For instance, Novo Hamburgo leads the cards stats table as matches involving them have over 5.5 cards 5% of the time.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.