# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Xerez CD |
30 | 13 | 43% |
2 |
![]() Real Betis II |
30 | 14 | 47% |
3 |
![]() Ciudad de Lucena |
29 | 12 | 41% |
4 |
![]() CD San Roque de Lepe |
29 | 16 | 55% |
5 |
![]() Córdoba II |
30 | 18 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Écija |
37 | 0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Arcos CF |
29 | 12 | 41% |
8 |
![]() Ceuta |
30 | 8 | 27% |
9 |
![]() Lebrijana |
30 | 15 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Utrera |
30 | 11 | 37% |
11 |
![]() Conil |
30 | 14 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Coria CF |
29 | 17 | 59% |
13 |
![]() Los Barrios |
30 | 13 | 43% |
14 |
![]() Puente Genil |
29 | 16 | 55% |
15 |
![]() Gerena |
29 | 12 | 41% |
16 |
![]() Xerez Deportivo |
29 | 9 | 31% |
17 |
![]() Sevilla C |
29 | 11 | 38% |
18 |
![]() Pozoblanco |
29 | 15 | 52% |
19 |
![]() Rota |
29 | 15 | 52% |
20 |
![]() Antoniano |
29 | 13 | 45% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Xerez CD |
15 | 7 | 47% |
2 |
![]() Real Betis II |
14 | 7 | 50% |
3 |
![]() Ciudad de Lucena |
14 | 8 | 57% |
4 |
![]() CD San Roque de Lepe |
15 | 8 | 53% |
5 |
![]() Córdoba II |
15 | 9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Écija |
19 | 0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Arcos CF |
15 | 8 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Ceuta |
15 | 4 | 27% |
9 |
![]() Lebrijana |
14 | 8 | 57% |
10 |
![]() Utrera |
14 | 5 | 36% |
11 |
![]() Conil |
14 | 5 | 36% |
12 |
![]() Coria CF |
14 | 6 | 43% |
13 |
![]() Los Barrios |
16 | 5 | 31% |
14 |
![]() Puente Genil |
15 | 8 | 53% |
15 |
![]() Gerena |
15 | 6 | 40% |
16 |
![]() Xerez Deportivo |
15 | 4 | 27% |
17 |
![]() Sevilla C |
14 | 5 | 36% |
18 |
![]() Pozoblanco |
15 | 9 | 60% |
19 |
![]() Rota |
15 | 9 | 60% |
20 |
![]() Antoniano |
15 | 6 | 40% |
# | Team | MP | BTTS | BTTS% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Xerez CD |
15 | 6 | 40% |
2 |
![]() Real Betis II |
16 | 7 | 44% |
3 |
![]() Ciudad de Lucena |
15 | 4 | 27% |
4 |
![]() CD San Roque de Lepe |
14 | 8 | 57% |
5 |
![]() Córdoba II |
15 | 9 | 60% |
6 |
![]() Écija |
18 | 0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Arcos CF |
14 | 4 | 29% |
8 |
![]() Ceuta |
15 | 4 | 27% |
9 |
![]() Lebrijana |
16 | 7 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Utrera |
16 | 6 | 38% |
11 |
![]() Conil |
16 | 9 | 56% |
12 |
![]() Coria CF |
15 | 11 | 73% |
13 |
![]() Los Barrios |
14 | 8 | 57% |
14 |
![]() Puente Genil |
14 | 8 | 57% |
15 |
![]() Gerena |
14 | 6 | 43% |
16 |
![]() Xerez Deportivo |
14 | 5 | 36% |
17 |
![]() Sevilla C |
15 | 6 | 40% |
18 |
![]() Pozoblanco |
14 | 6 | 43% |
19 |
![]() Rota |
14 | 6 | 43% |
20 |
![]() Antoniano |
14 | 7 | 50% |
This section shows the statistics on how many times Pozoblanco and Sevilla C have both scored and conceded in the same match in the Tercera Group 10.
The “Both Teams to Score” stat is a good data point to use for seeing whether or not a match will feature many (or any) goals. If both teams have a high rate of both scoring and conceding goals, then there is a good chance that a couple of goals will go in. But if one or both teams have low BTTS rates, then their match could be a lower-scoring affair.
Check out the BTTS (both teams to score) stats for the match:
It’s important to consider BTTS statistics when analysing teams as they provide insight into the teams’ overall approach and performance in matches. Teams with a high percentage of both teams scoring usually have more attacking approaches, whilst a lower rate of both teams scoring could point to a slightly more conservative gameplan for the most part.
And of course, this information should prove quite valuable when picking bets on the “Both Teams to Score” market and other goal-related markets
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.