Football statistics for Zibo Cuju

Team Info

Season

2022

Country

China

Competition

China

China League One

Summary Match Results Squads Top Scorers & Assists Standings

Table Corners Cards 1st Half 2nd Half Over Under Goals Clean Sheet BTTS Match Scoring / Conceding First

Over 2.5
Over 0.5
Over 1.5
Over 3.5
Over 4.5
Over 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	24	71%	71%	71%
2	Beijing BG	34	16	47%	47%	47%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	17	50%	47%	53%
4	BIT	34	19	56%	53%	59%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	18	53%	53%	53%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	20	59%	59%	59%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	14	41%	24%	59%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	20	59%	47%	71%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	20	59%	59%	59%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	14	41%	53%	29%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	18	53%	53%	53%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	19	56%	65%	47%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	17	50%	59%	41%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	8	24%	24%	24%
15	Kunshan	34	17	50%	47%	53%
16	Nanjing City	34	17	50%	59%	41%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	18	53%	59%	47%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	14	41%	35%	47%

#	Team	MP	Over 0.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	34	100%	100%	100%
2	Beijing BG	34	33	97%	100%	94%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	33	97%	100%	94%
4	BIT	34	32	94%	94%	94%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	34	100%	100%	100%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	32	94%	88%	100%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	33	97%	94%	100%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	30	88%	82%	94%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	30	88%	82%	94%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	25	74%	71%	76%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	32	94%	100%	88%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	31	91%	88%	94%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	29	85%	88%	82%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	34	100%	100%	100%
15	Kunshan	34	32	94%	94%	94%
16	Nanjing City	34	28	82%	88%	76%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	30	88%	94%	82%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	30	88%	88%	88%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	29	85%	82%	88%
2	Beijing BG	34	25	74%	76%	71%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	29	85%	94%	76%
4	BIT	34	27	79%	82%	76%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	29	85%	82%	88%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	28	82%	76%	88%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	25	74%	71%	76%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	24	71%	65%	76%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	24	71%	76%	65%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	18	53%	53%	53%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	28	82%	88%	76%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	28	82%	76%	88%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	23	68%	71%	65%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	24	71%	76%	65%
15	Kunshan	34	29	85%	82%	88%
16	Nanjing City	34	24	71%	76%	65%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	25	74%	76%	71%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	23	68%	53%	82%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	13	38%	35%	41%
2	Beijing BG	34	8	24%	29%	18%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	8	24%	18%	29%
4	BIT	34	12	35%	24%	47%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	9	26%	35%	18%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	11	32%	35%	29%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	9	26%	18%	35%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	7	21%	12%	29%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	11	32%	35%	29%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	7	21%	29%	12%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	8	24%	24%	24%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	14	41%	53%	29%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	5	15%	6%	24%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	2	6%	12%	0%
15	Kunshan	34	10	29%	35%	24%
16	Nanjing City	34	10	29%	29%	29%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	11	32%	24%	41%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	7	21%	24%	18%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	7	21%	29%	12%
2	Beijing BG	34	1	3%	0%	6%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	7	21%	18%	24%
4	BIT	34	4	12%	6%	18%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	1	3%	6%	0%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	4	12%	6%	18%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	4	12%	12%	12%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	3	9%	0%	18%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	4	12%	0%	24%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	3	9%	12%	6%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	1	3%	6%	0%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	7	21%	35%	6%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	1	3%	6%	0%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	2	6%	12%	0%
15	Kunshan	34	6	18%	18%	18%
16	Nanjing City	34	4	12%	12%	12%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	5	15%	12%	18%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	4	12%	12%	12%

#	Team	MP	Over 1.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	4	12%	12%	12%
2	Beijing BG	34	0	0%	0%	0%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	5	15%	18%	12%
4	BIT	34	1	3%	0%	6%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	0	0%	0%	0%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	1	3%	0%	6%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	1	3%	0%	6%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	0	0%	0%	0%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	1	3%	0%	6%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	2	6%	6%	6%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	0	0%	0%	0%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	2	6%	12%	0%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	0	0%	0%	0%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	0	0%	0%	0%
15	Kunshan	34	3	9%	6%	12%
16	Nanjing City	34	0	0%	0%	0%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	2	6%	12%	0%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	2	6%	6%	6%

Under 2.5
Under 0.5
Under 1.5
Under 3.5
Under 4.5
Under 5.5

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	10	29%	29%	29%
2	Beijing BG	34	18	53%	53%	53%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	17	50%	53%	47%
4	BIT	34	15	44%	47%	41%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	16	47%	47%	47%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	14	41%	41%	41%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	20	59%	76%	41%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	14	41%	53%	29%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	14	41%	41%	41%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	20	59%	47%	71%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	16	47%	47%	47%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	15	44%	35%	53%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	17	50%	41%	59%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	26	76%	76%	76%
15	Kunshan	34	17	50%	53%	47%
16	Nanjing City	34	17	50%	41%	59%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	16	47%	41%	53%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	20	59%	65%	53%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	0	0%	0%	0%
2	Beijing BG	34	1	3%	0%	6%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	1	3%	0%	6%
4	BIT	34	2	6%	6%	6%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	0	0%	0%	0%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	2	6%	12%	0%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	1	3%	6%	0%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	4	12%	18%	6%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	4	12%	18%	6%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	9	26%	29%	24%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	2	6%	0%	12%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	3	9%	12%	6%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	5	15%	12%	18%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	0	0%	0%	0%
15	Kunshan	34	2	6%	6%	6%
16	Nanjing City	34	6	18%	12%	24%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	4	12%	6%	18%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	4	12%	12%	12%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	5	15%	18%	12%
2	Beijing BG	34	9	26%	24%	29%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	5	15%	6%	24%
4	BIT	34	7	21%	18%	24%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	5	15%	18%	12%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	6	18%	24%	12%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	9	26%	29%	24%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	10	29%	35%	24%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	10	29%	24%	35%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	16	47%	47%	47%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	6	18%	12%	24%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	6	18%	24%	12%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	11	32%	29%	35%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	10	29%	24%	35%
15	Kunshan	34	5	15%	18%	12%
16	Nanjing City	34	10	29%	24%	35%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	9	26%	24%	29%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	11	32%	47%	18%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	21	62%	65%	59%
2	Beijing BG	34	26	76%	71%	82%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	26	76%	82%	71%
4	BIT	34	22	65%	76%	53%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	25	74%	65%	82%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	23	68%	65%	71%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	25	74%	82%	65%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	27	79%	88%	71%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	23	68%	65%	71%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	27	79%	71%	88%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	26	76%	76%	76%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	20	59%	47%	71%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	29	85%	94%	76%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	32	94%	88%	100%
15	Kunshan	34	24	71%	65%	76%
16	Nanjing City	34	24	71%	71%	71%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	23	68%	76%	59%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	27	79%	76%	82%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	27	79%	71%	88%
2	Beijing BG	34	33	97%	100%	94%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	27	79%	82%	76%
4	BIT	34	30	88%	94%	82%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	33	97%	94%	100%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	30	88%	94%	82%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	30	88%	88%	88%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	31	91%	100%	82%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	30	88%	100%	76%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	31	91%	88%	94%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	33	97%	94%	100%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	27	79%	65%	94%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	33	97%	94%	100%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	32	94%	88%	100%
15	Kunshan	34	28	82%	82%	82%
16	Nanjing City	34	30	88%	88%	88%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	29	85%	88%	82%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	30	88%	88%	88%

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Overall	Home	Away
1	Xinjiang Tianshan	34	30	88%	88%	88%
2	Beijing BG	34	34	100%	100%	100%
3	Qingdao Jonoon	34	29	85%	82%	88%
4	BIT	34	33	97%	100%	94%
5	Jiangxi Liansheng	34	34	100%	100%	100%
6	Heilongjiang Lava Spring	34	33	97%	100%	94%
7	Shaanxi Chang'an	34	33	97%	100%	94%
8	Nantong Zhiyun	34	34	100%	100%	100%
9	Zibo Cuju	34	33	97%	100%	94%
10	Guangxi Baoyun	34	32	94%	94%	94%
11	Shenyang Urban	34	34	100%	100%	100%
12	Shanghai Jiading	34	32	94%	88%	100%
13	Suzhou Dongwu	34	34	100%	100%	100%
14	Sichuan Jiuniu	34	34	100%	100%	100%
15	Kunshan	34	31	91%	94%	88%
16	Nanjing City	34	34	100%	100%	100%
17	Qingdao Youth Island	34	32	94%	88%	100%
18	Hebei Kungfu	34	32	94%	94%	94%

Average goals scored and conceded: Zibo Cuju

Knowing Zibo Cuju’s averages in terms of goals scored and conceded is instrumental in understanding how the team is performing in the China League One 2022 on both ends of the pitch.

Check out some of the Zibo Cuju’s over/under numbers and goal rates below:

59% of Zibo Cuju games in the league have had 3 or more goals (Zibo Cuju and opponent goals, combined). The percentage of games where matches have had 2 or fewer goals is 41%.

This page can filter the number of goals, from above or below 0.5 goals to 5.5 goals. You can also sort them in ascending and descending order based on the number of times it has occurred, as well as their frequency at home, away from home, and overall in China League One.

All of this information can help determine how Zibo Cuju’s offence and defence are performing throughout the season. If the goal rate during matches is high, it is important to determine the cause of such a lot of goals going in.

However, it is important to remember that goal percentage statistics cannot be analysed in isolation. Instead, they should be considered alongside several other factors, such as tactics, personnel moves, and others.