Clean Sheet
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Xinjiang Tianshan | 34 | 3 | 9% |
| 2 |  Beijing BG | 34 | 5 | 15% |
| 3 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 34 | 14 | 41% |
| 4 |  BIT | 34 | 3 | 9% |
| 5 |  Jiangxi Liansheng | 34 | 5 | 15% |
| 6 |  Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 34 | 9 | 26% |
| 7 |  Shaanxi Chang'an | 34 | 12 | 35% |
| 8 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 34 | 19 | 56% |
| 9 |  Zibo Cuju | 34 | 9 | 26% |
| 10 |  Guangxi Baoyun | 34 | 11 | 32% |
| 11 |  Shenyang Urban | 34 | 7 | 21% |
| 12 |  Shanghai Jiading | 34 | 7 | 21% |
| 13 |  Suzhou Dongwu | 34 | 14 | 41% |
| 14 |  Sichuan Jiuniu | 34 | 14 | 41% |
| 15 |  Kunshan | 34 | 17 | 50% |
| 16 |  Nanjing City | 34 | 13 | 38% |
| 17 |  Qingdao Youth Island | 34 | 8 | 24% |
| 18 |  Hebei Kungfu | 34 | 16 | 47% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Home |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 3 | 18% |
| 2 | Beijing BG | 17 | 2 | 12% |
| 3 | Qingdao Jonoon | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 4 | BIT | 17 | 1 | 6% |
| 5 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 2 | 12% |
| 6 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 7 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 8 | Nantong Zhiyun | 17 | 10 | 59% |
| 9 | Zibo Cuju | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 10 | Guangxi Baoyun | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 11 | Shenyang Urban | 17 | 2 | 12% |
| 12 | Shanghai Jiading | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 13 | Suzhou Dongwu | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 14 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 15 | Kunshan | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 16 | Nanjing City | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 17 | Qingdao Youth Island | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 18 | Hebei Kungfu | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| # | Team | MP | Clean Sheet | Away |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xinjiang Tianshan | 17 | 0 | 0% |
| 2 | Beijing BG | 17 | 3 | 18% |
| 3 | Qingdao Jonoon | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 4 | BIT | 17 | 2 | 12% |
| 5 | Jiangxi Liansheng | 17 | 3 | 18% |
| 6 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 7 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 17 | 7 | 41% |
| 8 | Nantong Zhiyun | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| 9 | Zibo Cuju | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 10 | Guangxi Baoyun | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 11 | Shenyang Urban | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 12 | Shanghai Jiading | 17 | 1 | 6% |
| 13 | Suzhou Dongwu | 17 | 6 | 35% |
| 14 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 17 | 5 | 29% |
| 15 | Kunshan | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 16 | Nanjing City | 17 | 8 | 47% |
| 17 | Qingdao Youth Island | 17 | 4 | 24% |
| 18 | Hebei Kungfu | 17 | 7 | 41% |
Zibo Cuju Clean Sheet Statistics
Zibo Cuju’s clean sheet statistics are key to gauging a team’s defensive performance in the China League One 2022. The number of matches a team completely prevents their opponents from scoring helps to make a more accurate evaluation of the defence’s overall ability during the season.
See below some data on the number of games without conceding for Zibo Cuju thus far this season:
- In 34 matches played in the championship, Zibo Cuju has had 9 matches without conceding a single goal. That means their defence has not been breached by their opponents in 26% of their matches this season.
- Zibo Cuju has kept a clean sheet in 5 of the 17 matches played at home so far this season.
- Meanwhile, Zibo Cuju has played 17 times away from home and has kept a clean sheet 4 times.
Visit this page all season long to stay up to date with all of Zibo Cuju's current clean sheet statistics, whether at home, away from home, or overall. Also, check out the latest football trends for today.