Season
2022
Country
China
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 76% |
2 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
34 | 74% |
3 |
![]() Hangzhou |
34 | 68% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
34 | 62% |
5 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
34 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
34 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
34 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
34 | 50% |
10 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
34 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 44% |
12 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
34 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
34 | 38% |
14 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
34 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Guangzhou R&F |
34 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Shenzhen |
34 | 26% |
17 |
![]() Guangzhou Evergrande |
34 | 21% |
18 |
![]() Hebei CFFC |
34 | 9% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
17 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 82% |
3 |
![]() Hangzhou |
17 | 71% |
4 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
17 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 59% |
8 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 59% |
9 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
17 | 53% |
10 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
17 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
17 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
17 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
17 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Shenzhen |
17 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 29% |
17 |
![]() Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 24% |
18 |
![]() Hebei CFFC |
17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 71% |
2 |
![]() Hangzhou |
17 | 65% |
3 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 59% |
4 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
17 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 59% |
6 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
17 | 59% |
7 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
17 | 53% |
9 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
17 | 47% |
11 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
17 | 47% |
12 |
![]() Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 35% |
13 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
17 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 29% |
15 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
17 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Shenzhen |
17 | 24% |
17 |
![]() Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 12% |
18 |
![]() Hebei CFFC |
17 | 6% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Hebei CFFC |
34 | 91% |
2 |
![]() Shenzhen |
34 | 71% |
3 |
![]() Guangzhou Evergrande |
34 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Guangzhou R&F |
34 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
34 | 62% |
6 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
34 | 56% |
7 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
34 | 47% |
8 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
34 | 44% |
9 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
34 | 44% |
10 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
34 | 44% |
11 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
34 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
34 | 38% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
34 | 32% |
14 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
34 | 32% |
15 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
34 | 32% |
16 |
![]() Hangzhou |
34 | 26% |
17 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
34 | 26% |
18 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
34 | 24% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Hebei CFFC |
17 | 88% |
2 |
![]() Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Shenzhen |
17 | 65% |
4 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
17 | 59% |
5 |
![]() Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 53% |
6 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
17 | 47% |
7 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
17 | 47% |
8 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
17 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 41% |
10 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
17 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
17 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 35% |
13 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 35% |
14 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Hangzhou |
17 | 24% |
16 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 24% |
17 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 18% |
18 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
17 | 12% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Hebei CFFC |
17 | 94% |
2 |
![]() Guangzhou Evergrande |
17 | 76% |
3 |
![]() Shenzhen |
17 | 76% |
4 |
![]() Tianjin Teda |
17 | 65% |
5 |
![]() Wuhan Zall |
17 | 65% |
6 |
![]() Guangzhou R&F |
17 | 53% |
7 |
![]() Meizhou Hakka |
17 | 53% |
8 |
![]() Shijiazhuang Ever Bright |
17 | 47% |
9 |
![]() Dalian Yifang |
17 | 47% |
10 |
![]() Beijing Guoan |
17 | 41% |
11 |
![]() Changchun Yatai |
17 | 41% |
12 |
![]() Shandong Luneng |
17 | 41% |
13 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
17 | 41% |
14 |
![]() Henan Jianye |
17 | 35% |
15 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
17 | 29% |
16 |
![]() Hangzhou |
17 | 29% |
17 |
![]() Wuhan Three Towns |
17 | 29% |
18 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
17 | 29% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Wuhan Zall scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the Chinese Super League 2022.
Through this stat, we can see whether Wuhan Zall is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the Chinese Super League, Wuhan Zall has scored before the opponent in 35% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 62%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Wuhan Zall’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Wuhan Zall being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.