Wuhan Zall Corners Per Game

Team Info

Season

Country

2022

China

Competition

China

Chinese Super League

Summary Matches Corners Stats Top Scorers & Assists Squads

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Dalian Yifang	33	76%	58%	58%	39%	27%	15%	6%	9.55
2	Wuhan Three Towns	33	70%	58%	58%	33%	21%	18%	12%	9.52
3	Changchun Yatai	33	76%	64%	52%	36%	24%	15%	12%	9.3
4	Hangzhou	33	61%	48%	39%	24%	18%	15%	12%	9.15
5	Shandong Luneng	33	70%	48%	36%	24%	15%	12%	6%	9.07
6	Guangzhou Evergrande	33	67%	48%	36%	24%	21%	12%	6%	9
7	Shanghai SIPG	33	67%	55%	39%	24%	18%	18%	18%	9
8	Chengdu Better City FC	33	67%	55%	42%	33%	21%	12%	3%	9
9	Beijing Guoan	33	64%	48%	39%	24%	18%	18%	12%	8.97
10	Guangzhou R&F	33	61%	48%	39%	30%	24%	21%	15%	8.94
11	Henan Jianye	33	61%	48%	42%	24%	15%	15%	12%	8.87
12	Wuhan Zall	33	67%	55%	33%	24%	21%	15%	9%	8.73
13	Shenzhen	33	67%	45%	36%	24%	15%	12%	3%	8.69
14	Meizhou Hakka	33	55%	52%	42%	27%	12%	9%	6%	8.57
15	Shanghai Shenhua	33	55%	48%	33%	24%	12%	9%	3%	8.37
16	Hebei CFFC	33	67%	39%	24%	15%	12%	9%	3%	8.31
17	Tianjin Teda	33	55%	36%	27%	15%	15%	9%	6%	7.84
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	33	45%	36%	30%	18%	9%	6%	6%	7.73

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Hangzhou	16	75%	63%	50%	31%	31%	25%	25%	10.93
2	Wuhan Three Towns	16	75%	69%	69%	31%	25%	25%	13%	9.76
3	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	76%	59%	41%	29%	24%	18%	12%	9.7
4	Beijing Guoan	17	65%	53%	41%	29%	24%	24%	18%	9.63
5	Guangzhou R&F	16	56%	50%	50%	38%	38%	31%	31%	9.38
6	Dalian Yifang	17	76%	53%	53%	35%	18%	12%	6%	9.35
7	Chengdu Better City FC	16	69%	63%	44%	38%	25%	13%	0%	9.19
8	Shanghai Shenhua	16	63%	56%	44%	31%	25%	19%	6%	9.06
9	Henan Jianye	17	53%	41%	41%	24%	6%	6%	6%	8.69
10	Changchun Yatai	17	76%	53%	35%	18%	6%	0%	0%	8.65
11	Shandong Luneng	16	69%	50%	31%	19%	13%	13%	0%	8.6
12	Wuhan Zall	17	59%	53%	35%	35%	29%	18%	12%	8.53
13	Shenzhen	17	71%	41%	29%	24%	12%	12%	0%	8.48
14	Hebei CFFC	16	63%	44%	25%	25%	19%	13%	6%	8.47
15	Meizhou Hakka	16	50%	44%	38%	25%	6%	6%	6%	8.44
16	Shanghai SIPG	16	69%	44%	38%	13%	6%	6%	6%	7.69
17	Tianjin Teda	17	53%	35%	24%	6%	6%	0%	0%	7.18
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	29%	24%	24%	18%	12%	6%	6%	7.18

#	Team	MP	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Over 9.5	Over 10.5	Over 11.5	Over 12.5	Over 13.5	Average
1	Shanghai SIPG	17	65%	65%	41%	35%	29%	29%	29%	10.31
2	Changchun Yatai	16	75%	75%	69%	56%	44%	31%	25%	10
3	Dalian Yifang	16	75%	63%	63%	44%	38%	19%	6%	9.75
4	Shandong Luneng	17	71%	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	12%	9.47
5	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	47%	35%	18%	12%	12%	9.3
6	Henan Jianye	16	69%	56%	44%	25%	25%	25%	19%	9.07
7	Wuhan Zall	16	75%	56%	31%	13%	13%	13%	6%	8.94
8	Shenzhen	16	63%	50%	44%	25%	19%	13%	6%	8.94
9	Chengdu Better City FC	17	65%	47%	41%	29%	18%	12%	6%	8.82
10	Meizhou Hakka	17	59%	59%	47%	29%	18%	12%	6%	8.69
11	Tianjin Teda	16	56%	38%	31%	25%	25%	19%	13%	8.6
12	Guangzhou R&F	17	65%	47%	29%	24%	12%	12%	0%	8.5
13	Beijing Guoan	16	63%	44%	38%	19%	13%	13%	6%	8.31
14	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	63%	50%	38%	19%	6%	6%	6%	8.31
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	56%	38%	31%	19%	19%	6%	0%	8.25
16	Hebei CFFC	17	71%	35%	24%	6%	6%	6%	0%	8.18
17	Shanghai Shenhua	17	47%	41%	24%	18%	0%	0%	0%	7.71
18	Hangzhou	17	47%	35%	29%	18%	6%	6%	0%	7.59

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shandong Luneng	31	97%	87%	77%	48%	35%	29%	23%	6.38
3	Wuhan Three Towns	31	90%	77%	52%	35%	32%	29%	23%	5.64
4	Chengdu Better City FC	31	87%	81%	71%	52%	39%	32%	16%	5.64
5	Dalian Yifang	31	103%	81%	71%	48%	32%	26%	16%	5.58
6	Shanghai SIPG	31	84%	74%	55%	42%	35%	29%	13%	5.5
7	Beijing Guoan	31	87%	74%	58%	45%	42%	26%	10%	5.44
8	Henan Jianye	31	81%	74%	58%	29%	23%	16%	13%	4.84
9	Meizhou Hakka	31	81%	65%	52%	35%	16%	13%	6%	4.63
10	Hangzhou	31	84%	65%	55%	35%	19%	13%	6%	4.56
11	Changchun Yatai	31	74%	68%	52%	35%	26%	16%	13%	4.36
12	Tianjin Teda	31	71%	55%	39%	26%	13%	10%	3%	4
13	Shenzhen	31	68%	55%	42%	26%	10%	6%	3%	3.91
14	Shanghai Shenhua	31	71%	58%	45%	29%	10%	3%	0%	3.79
15	Wuhan Zall	31	84%	52%	35%	16%	3%	3%	0%	3.7
16	Guangzhou Evergrande	31	65%	39%	29%	19%	13%	3%	0%	3.39
17	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	31	65%	26%	6%	6%	3%	3%	3%	2.97
18	Guangzhou R&F	31	42%	32%	26%	19%	10%	3%	3%	2.91
19	Hebei CFFC	31	29%	23%	3%	3%	0%	0%	0%	2.09

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Beijing Guoan	17	82%	65%	53%	47%	47%	29%	18%	6.13
3	Wuhan Three Towns	16	88%	81%	56%	44%	38%	31%	25%	6.13
4	Shandong Luneng	16	88%	75%	69%	44%	31%	25%	19%	5.93
5	Chengdu Better City FC	16	81%	81%	63%	50%	38%	31%	19%	5.81
6	Dalian Yifang	17	100%	76%	71%	41%	29%	24%	12%	5.59
7	Hangzhou	16	81%	56%	56%	44%	31%	25%	13%	5.2
8	Henan Jianye	17	76%	71%	53%	24%	18%	12%	6%	4.81
9	Changchun Yatai	17	88%	82%	53%	29%	18%	6%	6%	4.71
10	Shanghai Shenhua	16	75%	69%	63%	38%	13%	6%	0%	4.56
11	Shanghai SIPG	16	69%	63%	44%	31%	31%	25%	6%	4.5
12	Meizhou Hakka	16	81%	69%	50%	38%	13%	13%	0%	4.5
13	Tianjin Teda	17	59%	47%	35%	24%	6%	0%	0%	3.59
14	Guangzhou R&F	16	44%	38%	38%	31%	13%	6%	6%	3.38
15	Wuhan Zall	17	71%	41%	35%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3.35
16	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	59%	35%	29%	12%	6%	0%	0%	3.29
17	Shenzhen	17	59%	47%	29%	12%	0%	0%	0%	3.24
18	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	59%	29%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.71
19	Hebei CFFC	16	25%	19%	0%	0%	0%	0%	0%	2.2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Shandong Luneng	17	94%	88%	76%	47%	35%	29%	24%	6.76
3	Shanghai SIPG	17	88%	76%	59%	47%	35%	29%	18%	6.5
4	Dalian Yifang	16	94%	75%	63%	50%	31%	25%	19%	5.56
5	Chengdu Better City FC	17	82%	71%	71%	47%	35%	29%	12%	5.47
6	Wuhan Three Towns	17	82%	65%	41%	24%	24%	24%	18%	5.18
7	Henan Jianye	16	75%	69%	56%	31%	25%	19%	19%	4.88
8	Beijing Guoan	16	81%	75%	56%	38%	31%	19%	0%	4.75
9	Meizhou Hakka	17	71%	53%	47%	29%	18%	12%	12%	4.75
10	Shenzhen	16	69%	56%	50%	38%	19%	13%	6%	4.67
11	Tianjin Teda	16	75%	56%	38%	25%	19%	19%	6%	4.47
12	Wuhan Zall	16	88%	56%	31%	19%	6%	6%	0%	4.06
13	Hangzhou	17	76%	65%	47%	24%	6%	0%	0%	4
14	Changchun Yatai	16	50%	44%	44%	38%	31%	25%	19%	4
15	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	63%	38%	25%	25%	19%	6%	0%	3.5
16	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	63%	19%	13%	13%	6%	6%	6%	3.25
17	Shanghai Shenhua	17	59%	41%	24%	18%	6%	0%	0%	3.06
18	Guangzhou R&F	17	35%	24%	12%	6%	6%	0%	0%	2.44
19	Hebei CFFC	17	29%	24%	6%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Hebei CFFC	31	90%	87%	81%	68%	52%	23%	10%	6.22
3	Guangzhou R&F	31	84%	77%	68%	52%	39%	29%	19%	6.03
4	Guangzhou Evergrande	31	97%	87%	71%	42%	29%	23%	19%	5.61
5	Wuhan Zall	31	84%	71%	55%	45%	29%	23%	13%	5.03
6	Changchun Yatai	31	84%	58%	48%	39%	26%	23%	16%	4.94
7	Shenzhen	31	90%	77%	52%	29%	19%	13%	6%	4.78
8	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	31	81%	71%	52%	35%	26%	19%	13%	4.76
9	Hangzhou	31	68%	58%	42%	23%	19%	16%	10%	4.59
10	Shanghai Shenhua	31	84%	71%	48%	32%	19%	16%	10%	4.58
11	Henan Jianye	31	71%	52%	39%	23%	13%	13%	10%	4.03
12	Dalian Yifang	31	71%	61%	48%	32%	10%	6%	3%	3.97
13	Meizhou Hakka	31	68%	48%	39%	19%	13%	13%	6%	3.94
14	Wuhan Three Towns	31	61%	52%	45%	26%	13%	13%	6%	3.88
15	Tianjin Teda	31	87%	48%	26%	19%	16%	6%	0%	3.84
16	Beijing Guoan	31	65%	45%	29%	19%	16%	13%	3%	3.53
17	Shanghai SIPG	31	61%	45%	29%	26%	10%	10%	6%	3.5
18	Chengdu Better City FC	31	58%	45%	42%	16%	13%	3%	0%	3.36
19	Shandong Luneng	31	58%	29%	13%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.69

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Guangzhou Evergrande	17	94%	88%	71%	53%	41%	29%	29%	6.41
3	Hebei CFFC	16	81%	81%	69%	56%	44%	19%	13%	6.27
4	Guangzhou R&F	16	75%	69%	63%	44%	38%	31%	19%	6
5	Hangzhou	16	69%	63%	56%	31%	25%	19%	19%	5.73
6	Shenzhen	17	100%	76%	53%	35%	29%	18%	6%	5.24
7	Wuhan Zall	17	76%	65%	53%	41%	29%	29%	18%	5.18
8	Shanghai Shenhua	16	69%	56%	44%	38%	25%	19%	13%	4.5
9	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	17	76%	59%	29%	29%	18%	18%	12%	4.47
10	Changchun Yatai	17	71%	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	6%	3.94
11	Meizhou Hakka	16	75%	50%	38%	13%	6%	6%	6%	3.94
12	Henan Jianye	17	59%	29%	29%	24%	18%	18%	12%	3.88
13	Dalian Yifang	17	65%	59%	47%	29%	6%	6%	0%	3.76
14	Wuhan Three Towns	16	50%	50%	44%	25%	6%	6%	0%	3.63
15	Tianjin Teda	17	82%	35%	24%	18%	12%	12%	0%	3.59
16	Beijing Guoan	17	59%	47%	29%	24%	18%	12%	0%	3.5
17	Chengdu Better City FC	16	56%	50%	44%	13%	13%	0%	0%	3.38
18	Shanghai SIPG	16	56%	38%	25%	19%	6%	6%	6%	3.19
19	Shandong Luneng	16	56%	31%	13%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.67

#	Team	MP	Over 2.5	Over 3.5	Over 4.5	Over 5.5	Over 6.5	Over 7.5	Over 8.5	Average
2	Hebei CFFC	17	88%	82%	82%	71%	53%	24%	6%	6.18
3	Guangzhou R&F	17	82%	76%	65%	53%	35%	24%	18%	6.06
4	Changchun Yatai	16	88%	63%	63%	50%	31%	31%	25%	6
5	Shijiazhuang Ever Bright	16	75%	75%	69%	38%	31%	19%	13%	5.06
6	Wuhan Zall	16	81%	69%	50%	44%	25%	13%	6%	4.88
7	Guangzhou Evergrande	16	88%	75%	63%	25%	13%	13%	6%	4.75
8	Shanghai Shenhua	17	88%	76%	47%	24%	12%	12%	6%	4.65
9	Shenzhen	16	69%	69%	44%	19%	6%	6%	6%	4.27
10	Henan Jianye	16	75%	69%	44%	19%	6%	6%	6%	4.19
11	Dalian Yifang	16	69%	56%	44%	31%	13%	6%	6%	4.19
12	Tianjin Teda	16	81%	56%	25%	19%	19%	0%	0%	4.13
13	Wuhan Three Towns	17	65%	47%	41%	24%	18%	18%	12%	4.12
14	Meizhou Hakka	17	53%	41%	35%	24%	18%	18%	6%	3.94
15	Shanghai SIPG	17	59%	47%	29%	29%	12%	12%	6%	3.81
16	Hangzhou	17	59%	47%	24%	12%	12%	12%	0%	3.59
17	Beijing Guoan	16	63%	38%	25%	13%	13%	13%	6%	3.56
18	Chengdu Better City FC	17	53%	35%	35%	18%	12%	6%	0%	3.35
19	Shandong Luneng	17	53%	24%	12%	6%	0%	0%	0%	2.71

Corner Statistics for Wuhan Zall: Averages, Trends, and Betting Numbers

On this page, you’ll find detailed corner statistics for Wuhan Zall across the 2022 season, with data designed to support corner betting analysis.

At the top of the table, you can switch competitions to compare corner averages from other tournaments and identify the best betting angles.

Wuhan Zall Corner Averages (Liga China)

As shown at the top of the page, the corner averages for Wuhan Zall provide a clear snapshot of the team’s corner trends. Below, we break down the numbers in a practical and easy-to-use format for betting purposes.

Here are the key corner statistics and averages for Wuhan Zall, based on the most up-to-date data from the Chinese Super League:

Matches involving Wuhan Zall average 8.73 total corners per game, combining corners won, and corners conceded - an important metric for over and under corner bets.
33.33% of matches featuring Wuhan Zall in this competition finished with over 9.5 corners, highlighting strong potential for high-corner markets.
On average, Wuhan Zall records 3.7 corners per match in their favour, showing how frequently the team applies attacking pressure.
In 15.15% of games, Wuhan Zall registered 5 or more corners, a useful benchmark for team corner lines.
Defensively, Wuhan Zall concedes an average of 5.03 corners per match, which can be valuable when evaluating opponent corner totals.

This section also allows you to analyse corner averages for Wuhan Zall in home and away matches, along with over and under rates for corners for and against - key factors when refining corner betting strategies.

Corner Betting Insights

Beyond presenting all corner averages for Wuhan Zall, APWin also provides dedicated resources for users who focus on corner betting.

You’ll find a specialised section for under corner predictions and another entirely focused on over corner bets, helping you identify value based on statistical trends.

Frequently Asked Questions

Below are the most common questions from users looking to understand corner betting data for this team.

What is the average number of corners for Wuhan Zall?

According to the data, Wuhan Zall averages 3.7 corners in their favor per match.

On average, how many corners are there in Wuhan Zall matches?

In the Chinese Super League, matches involving Wuhan Zall average 8.73 total corners per game.