Football statistics for Shenzhen
Team Info
Season
2023
Country
China
Competition
Corners
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 77% | 77% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 37% | 23% | 10.93 |
| 2 |  Tianjin Teda | 30 | 80% | 67% | 57% | 47% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 10.17 |
| 3 |  Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 80% | 70% | 57% | 47% | 27% | 23% | 17% | 10.1 |
| 4 |  Hangzhou | 30 | 77% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 30% | 23% | 20% | 10 |
| 5 |  Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 77% | 70% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 9.94 |
| 6 |  Beijing Guoan | 30 | 77% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 37% | 17% | 10% | 9.77 |
| 7 |  Dalian Yifang | 30 | 77% | 60% | 43% | 37% | 30% | 20% | 13% | 9.57 |
| 8 |  Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 67% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 23% | 20% | 10% | 9.3 |
| 9 |  Henan Jianye | 30 | 67% | 57% | 40% | 33% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 9.2 |
| 10 |  Qingdao Jonoon | 30 | 77% | 57% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 10% | 10% | 9.14 |
| 11 |  Chengdu Better City FC | 30 | 60% | 50% | 37% | 27% | 20% | 10% | 7% | 9.03 |
| 12 | Shenzhen | 30 | 73% | 50% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 10% | 7% | 8.84 |
| 13 |  Shandong Luneng | 30 | 70% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 3% | 8.8 |
| 14 |  Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 67% | 50% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 8.73 |
| 15 |  Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 60% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 23% | 17% | 3% | 8.6 |
| 16 |  Changchun Yatai | 30 | 57% | 47% | 33% | 30% | 20% | 17% | 10% | 8.56 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 80% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 11.34 |
| 2 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 67% | 60% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 9.87 |
| 3 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 9.94 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 10.2 |
| 5 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 73% | 67% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 10.66 |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 80% | 67% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 10.2 |
| 7 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 9.93 |
| 8 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9.66 |
| 9 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 53% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 8.6 |
| 10 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 60% | 47% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 8.46 |
| 11 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 9.06 |
| 12 | Shenzhen | 15 | 87% | 53% | 47% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.2 |
| 13 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 67% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8.26 |
| 14 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 73% | 60% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 9.2 |
| 15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 67% | 67% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 0% | 8.73 |
| 16 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 40% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 7.33 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Over 9.5 | Over 10.5 | Over 11.5 | Over 12.5 | Over 13.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 73% | 73% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 10.53 |
| 2 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 93% | 73% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 10.46 |
| 3 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10.27 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 73% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 9.8 |
| 5 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 80% | 73% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.2 |
| 6 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 73% | 53% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 9.34 |
| 7 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 73% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 9.2 |
| 8 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 60% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 8.93 |
| 9 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 80% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 9.8 |
| 10 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 93% | 67% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 9.8 |
| 11 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 40% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 9 |
| 12 | Shenzhen | 15 | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 8.46 |
| 13 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 73% | 73% | 67% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 9.33 |
| 14 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 60% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 8.26 |
| 15 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 53% | 40% | 33% | 33% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 8.46 |
| 16 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 9.8 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 87% | 70% | 47% | 30% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 4.87 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 87% | 80% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 23% | 13% | 5.87 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 30 | 70% | 53% | 30% | 17% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 4.13 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 87% | 60% | 50% | 37% | 23% | 17% | 13% | 5 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 30 | 83% | 73% | 63% | 63% | 47% | 30% | 17% | 6.1 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 67% | 53% | 43% | 13% | 10% | 3% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 30 | 90% | 77% | 63% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 5.77 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 73% | 53% | 33% | 23% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.77 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 30 | 73% | 67% | 57% | 40% | 27% | 17% | 7% | 4.97 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 30 | 73% | 50% | 40% | 33% | 17% | 7% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 30 | 50% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 7% | 7% | 3.07 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 17% | 13% | 4.97 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 30 | 73% | 53% | 30% | 23% | 7% | 3% | 0% | 3.87 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 87% | 70% | 57% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 5.6 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 87% | 67% | 43% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 0% | 4.5 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 30 | 87% | 83% | 70% | 53% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 5.23 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 80% | 80% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 27% | 5.53 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 67% | 60% | 27% | 13% | 6.73 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 4.33 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 93% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 6.33 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 67% | 53% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.4 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 93% | 80% | 53% | 33% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 5.13 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 67% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 73% | 73% | 67% | 53% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 5.8 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 13% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 13% | 3.6 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 33% | 13% | 13% | 5.27 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 67% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.73 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 93% | 73% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 40% | 27% | 6.67 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 87% | 80% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 4.47 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 93% | 93% | 80% | 67% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 5.93 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 93% | 60% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 4.2 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 5 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 80% | 67% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 80% | 60% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.07 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 53% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 5.87 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 67% | 53% | 47% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 87% | 73% | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 6.4 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 80% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.53 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 73% | 60% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 4.13 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 80% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.53 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 4.67 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 80% | 67% | 33% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 4 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 40% | 0% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 87% | 53% | 53% | 40% | 33% | 7% | 0% | 4.53 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 40% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 4.53 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 30 | 83% | 77% | 63% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 7% | 5.07 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 30 | 63% | 40% | 30% | 17% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3.43 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 30 | 90% | 63% | 50% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 10% | 5.07 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 30 | 87% | 73% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 10% | 3% | 5 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 30 | 60% | 43% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 3% | 0% | 3.67 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 30 | 83% | 63% | 47% | 43% | 27% | 20% | 17% | 5.03 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 30 | 57% | 37% | 20% | 10% | 3% | 3% | 3% | 3.03 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 30 | 80% | 67% | 47% | 40% | 30% | 27% | 7% | 4.83 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 30 | 87% | 63% | 53% | 47% | 30% | 27% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 30 | 83% | 77% | 60% | 50% | 37% | 17% | 10% | 5.47 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 30 | 90% | 77% | 67% | 53% | 33% | 23% | 13% | 5.77 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 30 | 77% | 67% | 50% | 47% | 43% | 20% | 7% | 5.13 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 30 | 93% | 77% | 57% | 40% | 23% | 10% | 10% | 5.27 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 30 | 83% | 63% | 57% | 47% | 37% | 20% | 13% | 5.33 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 30 | 73% | 63% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 10% | 7% | 4.23 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 30 | 63% | 50% | 20% | 17% | 13% | 7% | 3% | 3.8 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 80% | 73% | 53% | 40% | 20% | 20% | 13% | 5.13 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 53% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 2.93 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 87% | 47% | 40% | 13% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.27 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 5.27 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 67% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 3.87 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 73% | 60% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 67% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 73% | 73% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 80% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 4.07 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 13% | 5.73 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 93% | 73% | 73% | 67% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 40% | 20% | 7% | 4.67 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 93% | 60% | 40% | 27% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 4.73 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 93% | 60% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.67 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 87% | 80% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.73 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 60% | 47% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 0% | 0% | 3.13 |
| # | Team | MP | Over 2.5 | Over 3.5 | Over 4.5 | Over 5.5 | Over 6.5 | Over 7.5 | Over 8.5 | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shijiazhuang Ever Bright | 15 | 87% | 80% | 73% | 40% | 27% | 0% | 0% | 5 |
| 2 | Shanghai SIPG | 15 | 73% | 47% | 33% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 7% | 3.93 |
| 3 | Henan Jianye | 15 | 93% | 80% | 60% | 47% | 47% | 27% | 13% | 5.87 |
| 4 | Hangzhou | 15 | 87% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 27% | 7% | 0% | 4.73 |
| 5 | Beijing Guoan | 15 | 53% | 40% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 0% | 3.47 |
| 6 | Changchun Yatai | 15 | 93% | 67% | 60% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 6.13 |
| 7 | Shandong Luneng | 15 | 47% | 40% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 2.93 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 15 | 87% | 60% | 47% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 13% | 4.93 |
| 9 | Tianjin Teda | 15 | 93% | 87% | 73% | 67% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 6.33 |
| 10 | Dalian Yifang | 15 | 80% | 73% | 60% | 53% | 33% | 13% | 7% | 5.2 |
| 11 | Shenzhen | 15 | 87% | 80% | 60% | 40% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 5.93 |
| 12 | Meizhou Hakka | 15 | 80% | 67% | 53% | 47% | 47% | 20% | 7% | 5.6 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 15 | 93% | 93% | 73% | 53% | 20% | 13% | 13% | 5.8 |
| 14 | Nantong Zhiyun | 15 | 73% | 67% | 67% | 60% | 53% | 27% | 20% | 6 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 15 | 60% | 47% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 7% | 7% | 3.73 |
| 16 | Chengdu Better City FC | 15 | 67% | 53% | 33% | 27% | 20% | 13% | 7% | 4.47 |
Shenzhen corner statistics
The number of corner kicks a team takes and surrenders provides insight into a team’s attacking ambition during games. It can also display their defensive strategy and how much they are allowing their opponents to attack.
Here are the Youth Army’s main corner kick numbers and averages in the Chinese Super League:
- Shenzhen games have an average of 8.84 corners (between corners won and awarded to the opponent).
- 40% of Shenzhen’s matches in this championship have had more than 9.5 corners.
- Youth Army has an average of 3.07 corners won per game this season.
- On 10% of occasions, Shenzhen had 5 or more corners in their favour in their games.
- Regarding corners given up, Shenzhen usually concedes an average of 5.77 corners per match.
You can also check out Youth Army’s average number of corners during home and away games, along with the over/under rates for corners for and against, for additional information.
And at APWin, you can also check out corner statistics daily and find which matches around the world are most likely to see a lot of corners.