Season
Country
Stadium
2025/26
Asia
Shanghai Stadium
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
2 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
1 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
1 | 100% |
6 |
![]() FC Seoul |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Nasaf |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
1 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Al Shorta |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 50% |
13 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Bangkok United |
0 | 0% |
25 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% |
26 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Al Shorta |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Al Duhail |
0 | 0% |
4 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% |
9 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Sepahan |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Bangkok United |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% |
25 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% |
26 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Scoring First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
1 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
1 | 100% |
6 |
![]() FC Seoul |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Nasaf |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Sepahan |
1 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Bangkok United |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% |
25 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% |
26 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Buriram United |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Al Ahli |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Al Hilal |
1 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Gangwon |
1 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Al Sadd |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Ulsan |
1 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Al Wahda |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
1 | 100% |
13 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 50% |
14 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Sepahan |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% |
25 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% |
26 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Al Duhail |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Al Ahli |
1 | 100% |
4 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
1 | 100% |
5 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
1 | 100% |
6 |
![]() Al Hilal |
1 | 100% |
7 |
![]() Gangwon |
1 | 100% |
8 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
1 | 100% |
9 |
![]() Al Wahda |
1 | 100% |
10 |
![]() Buriram United |
1 | 100% |
11 |
![]() Ulsan |
1 | 100% |
12 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Al Sadd |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Sepahan |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% |
25 |
![]() Bangkok United |
0 | 0% |
26 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% |
# | Team | MP | Conceding First |
---|---|---|---|
1 |
![]() Bangkok United |
1 | 100% |
2 |
![]() Al Sadd |
1 | 100% |
3 |
![]() Al Duhail |
0 | 0% |
4 |
![]() Al Gharafa |
0 | 0% |
5 |
![]() Shabab Al Ahli Dubai |
0 | 0% |
6 |
![]() Al Wahda |
0 | 0% |
7 |
![]() Al Sharjah |
0 | 0% |
8 |
![]() Al Ahli |
0 | 0% |
9 |
![]() Al Hilal |
0 | 0% |
10 |
![]() Al Ittihad |
0 | 0% |
11 |
![]() Tractor Sazi |
0 | 0% |
12 |
![]() Nasaf |
0 | 0% |
13 |
![]() Sepahan |
0 | 0% |
14 |
![]() Al Shorta |
0 | 0% |
15 |
![]() Chengdu Better City FC |
0 | 0% |
16 |
![]() Johor Darul Ta'zim |
0 | 0% |
17 |
![]() Melbourne City FC |
0 | 0% |
18 |
![]() Shanghai SIPG |
0 | 0% |
19 |
![]() Shanghai Shenhua |
0 | 0% |
20 |
![]() Machida Zelvia |
0 | 0% |
21 |
![]() Sanfrecce Hiroshima |
0 | 0% |
22 |
![]() Vissel Kobe |
0 | 0% |
23 |
![]() Buriram United |
0 | 0% |
24 |
![]() Gangwon |
0 | 0% |
25 |
![]() FC Seoul |
0 | 0% |
26 |
![]() Ulsan |
0 | 0% |
This section of the APWin football statistics platform shows the times in which Shanghai SIPG scored before the opponent as well as the times in which they conceded the first goal of the match in the AFC Champions League 2025/2026.
Through this stat, we can see whether Shanghai SIPG is often the one in charge of matches and gets ahead most of the time, or if they are the ones playing catchup.
In the AFC Champions League, Shanghai SIPG has scored before the opponent in 0% of the games played. On the other hand, the percentage of times they have conceded the first goal is 0%.
This data helps give a clearer view of Shanghai SIPG’s habits on both offence and defence.
If the percentage of scoring first is high, it likely points to Shanghai SIPG being the more aggressive of the two sides with more control of the match. And if the percentage of conceding the first goal is higher, then it points to a club that is not among the best and has some defensive deficiencies.
If you want to dive even deeper into this statistic, you can also use the filters to see the score first/concede first rates in home and away games during the season.
Switch to
Would you like to change to ?
Login or Signup to add to favourites
You can login with social media
Not registered yet? Create an Account.